酸铝胁迫土壤中耐铝大豆根际不同部位细菌群落结构、功能及其对促生菌富集作用的研究
|
文钟灵, 杨旻恺, 陈星雨, 郝晨宇, 任然, 储淑娟, 韩洪苇, 林红燕, 陆桂华, 戚金亮, 杨永华
|
Bacterial composition, function and the enrichment of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in differential rhizosphere compartments of Al-tolerant soybean in acidic soil
|
Wen Zhongling, Yang Minkai, Chen Xingyu, Hao Chenyu, Ren Ran, Chu Shujuan, Han Hongwei, Lin Hongyan, Lu Guihua, Qi Jinliang, Yang Yonghua
|
|
表1 不同样品细菌群落结构的统计分析
|
Table 1 Statistical analysis of bacterial community structure
|
|
对比样本信息 | Adonis分析 | ANOSIM分析 | R2 | P-value | Statistic | P-value | BX_16FBS vs. BD_16FBS | 0.487 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BX_16FSRH vs. BD_16FSRH | 0.291 | 0.2 | 0.2593 | 0.186 | BX_16FBRH vs. BD_16FBRH | 0.512 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BX_16FWRH vs. BD_16FWRH | 0.327 | 0.1 | 0.4815 | 0.098 | BX_16FBS vs. BX_16FSRH | 0.231 | 0.2 | 0.037 | 0.4 | BX_16FBS vs. BX_16FBRH | 0.580 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BX_16FBS vs. BX_16FWRH | 0.584 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BX_16FSRH vs. BX_16FBRH | 0.680 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BX_16FSRH vs. BX_16FWRH | 0.718 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BX_16FBRH vs. BX_16FWRH | 0.488 | 0.1 | 0.8148 | 0.098 | BD_16FBS vs. BD_16FSRH | 0.479 | 0.1 | 0.6296 | 0.098 | BD_16FBS vs. BD_16FBRH | 0.556 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BD_16FBS vs. BD_16FWRH | 0.603 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BD_16FSRH vs. BD_16FBRH | 0.447 | 0.1 | 0.9259 | 0.098 | BD_16FSRH vs. BD_16FWRH | 0.620 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.098 | BD_16FBRH vs. BD_16FWRH | 0.373 | 0.1 | 0.5926 | 0.098 |
|
|
|