[an error occurred while processing this directive]
en

Technological advances in single-cell genomic analyses

Expand
  • Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven CT 06520-8005, USA

Received date: 2010-08-23

  Revised date: 2010-10-31

  Online published: 2011-01-20

Abstract

The technological progress of the genomics has transformed life science research. The main objectives of genomics are sequencing of new genomes and genome-wide identification of the function and the interaction of genes and their products. The recently developed second generation or next generation sequencing platforms and DNA microarray technology are immensely important and powerful tools for functional genomic analyses. However, their application is limited by the requirement of sufficient amounts of high quality nucleic acid samples. Therefore, when only a single cell or a very small number of cells are available or are preferred, the whole genomic sequencing or functional genomic objectives cannot be achieved conventionally and require a robust amplification method. This review highlights DNA amplification technologies and summarizes the strategies currently utilized for whole genome sequencing of a single cell, with specific focus on studies investigating microorganisms; An outline for targeted re-sequencing enabling the analysis of larger genomes is also provided. Furthermore, the review presents the emerging functional genomic applications using next-generation sequencing or microarray analysis to examine genome-wide transcriptional profile, chromatin modification and other types of protein-DNA binding profile, and CpG methylation mapping in a single cell or a very low quantity of cells. The nature of these technologies and their prospects are also addressed.

Cite this article

BO Xing-Hua, SHU Hai-Yang, MARJANI Sadie L. . Technological advances in single-cell genomic analyses[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2011 , 33(1) : 17 -24 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2011.00017

References

[1] Liu ET. Functional genomics of cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2008, 18(3): 251–256.

[2] Geschwind DH, Konopka G. Neuroscience in the era of functional genomics and systems biology. Nature, 2009, 461(7266): 908–915.

[3] Pieroni E, de la Fuente van Bentem S, Mancosu G, Capobianco E, Hirt H, de la Fuente A. Protein networking: insights into global functional organization of proteomes. Proteomics, 2008, 8(4): 799–816.

[4] Abu-Farha M, Elisma F, Zhou H, Tian R, Zhou H, Asmer MS, Figeys D. Proteomics: from technology developments to biological applications. Anal Chem, 2009, 81(12): 4585–4599.

[5] Wilusz JE, Sunwoo H, Spector DL. Long noncoding RNAs: functional surprises from the RNAworld. Genes Dev, 2009, 23(13): 1494–1504.

[6] Chen PY, Meister G. MicroRNA-guided posttranscriptional gene regulation. Biol Chem, 2005, 386(12): 1205–1218.

[7] Butcher LM, Beck S. Future impact of integrated high-throughput methylome analyses on human health and disease. J Genet Genomics, 2008, 35(7): 391–401.

[8] Beck S, Rakyan VK. The methylome: approaches for global DNA methylation profiling. Trends Genet, 2008, 24(5): 231–237.

[9] Morozova O, Marra MA. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics, 2008, 92(5): 255–264.

[10] Wold B, Myers RM. Sequence census methods for functional genomics. Nat Methods, 2008, 5(1): 19–21.

[11] 谭建新, 孙玉洁. 表观基因组学研究方法进展与评价. 遗传, 2009, 31(1): 3–12.

[12] Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet, 2008, 9(6): 465–476.

[13] Jirtle RL, Skinner MK. Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat Rev Genet, 2007, 8(4): 253–262.

[14] Esteller M. Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat Rev Genet, 2007, 8(4): 286–298.

[15] Gondo Y. Trends in large-scale mouse mutagenesis: from genetics to functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet, 2008, 9(10): 803–810.

[16] Gondo Y, Fukumura R, Murata T, Makino S. Next-generation gene targeting in the mouse for functional genomics. BMB Rep, 2009, 42(6): 315–323.

[17] Shendure J, Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol, 2008, 26(10): 1135–1145.

[18] Mardis ER. The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends Genet, 2008, 24(3): 133–141.

[19] Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10(1): 57–63.

[20] Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11(1): 31–46.

[21] Pushkarev D, Neff NF, Quake SR. Single-molecule sequencing of an individual human genome. Nat Biotechnol, 2009, 27(9): 847–850.

[22] Ozsolak F, Platt AR, Jones DR, Reifenberger JG, Sass LE, McInerney P, Thompson JF, Bowers J, Jarosz M, Milos PM. Direct RNA sequencing. Nature, 2009, 461(7265): 814–818.

[23] Ozsolak F, Ting DT, Wittner BS, Brannigan BW, Paul S, Bardeesy N, Ramaswamy S, Milos PM, Haber DA. Amplification-free digital gene expression profiling from minute cell quantities. Nat Methods, 2010, 7(8): 619–621.

[24] Walker A, Parkhill J. Single-cell genomics. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2008, 6(3): 176–177.

[25] Ochman H. Single-cell genomics. Environ Microbiol, 2007, 9(1): 7.

[26] Hamady M, Knight R. Microbial community profiling for human microbiome projects: tools, techniques, and challenges. Genome Res, 2009, 19(7): 1141–1152.

[27] Weckx S, De Vuyst L. Metagenome and metatranscriptome analysis: does the flag always cover the cargo? Int J Food Microbiol, 2009, 133(3): 292–293.

[28] Baveye PC. To sequence or not to sequence the whole-soil metagenome? Nat Rev Mi
Outlines

/