[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Research progress of epigenetic transgenerational phenotype

Expand
  • 1. College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China;
    2. College of Life Sciences, Zhoukou Normal University, Zhoukou 466000, China; 
    3. Department of Education Sciences, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang 453003, China

Received date: 2013-08-29

  Revised date: 2014-01-19

  Online published: 2014-04-24

Abstract

The epigenome undergoes a reprogramming process during gametogenesis and early embryogenesis. Therefore, it is believed that epigenetic information cannot be transmitted across generations. However, the occurrence of epigenetic transgenerational phenotype suggests that certain epigenetic marks may escape reprogramming. Although the existence of such a mode of inheritance has been controversial, there is increasing evidence that epigenetic memory does occur in mammals. Due to the reversibility of epigenetic modification, the epigenome is easily changed by a variety of environ-mental factors, such as chemicals, nutrition and behaviour. Therefore, it provides a potential mechanism for the transgen-erational transmission of the impact of environmental factors. The purpose of this review is to introduce the concept of epi-genetic transgenerational phenotype, to discuss the epigenetic reprogramming and the molecular mechanism of epigenetic transgenerational transmission, and to list some environmental factors that are associated with epigenetic transgenerational diseases.

Cite this article

Kexue Ma, Keshi Ma, Xingzi Xi . Research progress of epigenetic transgenerational phenotype[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2014 , 36(5) : 476 -484 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2014.0476

References

[1] Eichler EE, Flint J, Gibson G, Kong A, Leal SM, Moore JH, Nadeau JH. Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11(6): 446–450. <\p>

[2] Matthews SG, Phillips DI. Transgenerational inheritance of stress pathology. Exp Neuro, 2012, 233(1): 95–101. <\p>

[3] Guerrero-Bosagna C, Skinner MK. Environmentally in-duced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of pheno-type and disease. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2012, 354(1–2): 3–8. <\p>

[4] Skinner MK, Manikkam M, Guerrero-Bosagna C. Epige-netic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors. Reprod Toxicol, 2011, 31(3): 337–343. <\p>

[5] Khashan AS, Abel KM, McNamee R, Pedersen MG, Webb RT, Baker PN, Kenny LC, Mortensen PB. Higher risk of offspring schizophrenia following antenatal maternal ex-posure to severe adverse life events. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2008, 65(2): 146–152. <\p>

[6] Dunn GA, Bale TL. Maternal high-fat diet effects on third-generation female body size via the paternal lineage. Endocrinology, 2011, 152(6): 2228–2236. <\p>

[7] Jensen P. Transgenerational epigenetic effects on animal behaviour. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 2013, 113(3): 447– 454. <\p>

[8] Skinner MK. What is an epigenetic transgenerational phenotype? F3 or F2. Reprod Toxicol, 2008, 25(1): 2–6. <\p>

[9] Champagne FA. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocrinol, 2008, 29(3): 386–397. <\p>

[10] Bohacek J, Gapp K, Saab BJ, Mansuy IM. Transgenerational epigenetic effects on brain functions. Biol Psy-chiatry, 2013, 73(4): 313–320. <\p>

[11] Gabory A, Attig L, Junien C. Sexual dimorphism in envi-ronmental epigenetic programming. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2009, 304(1-2): 8–18. <\p>

[12] Migicovsky Z, Kovalchuk I. Epigenetic memory in mam-mals. Front Genet, 2011, 2: 28. <\p>

[13] Li YF, Sasaki H. Genomic imprinting in mammals: its life cycle, molecular mechanisms and reprogramming. Cell Res, 2011, 21(3): 466–473. <\p>

[14] Guibert S, Forné T, Weber M. Global profiling of DNA methylation erasure in mouse primordial germ cells. Ge-nome Res, 2012, 22(4): 633–641. <\p>

[15] Franklin TB, Russig H, Weiss IC, Gräff J, Linder N, Michalon A, Vizi S, Mansuy IM. Epigenetic transmission of the impact of early stress across generations. Biol Psy-chiatry, 2010, 68(5): 408–415. <\p>

[16] Li Y, O'Neill C. Persistence of cytosine methylation of DNA following fertilisation in the mouse. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(1): e30687. <\p>

[17] Kelsey G, Feil R. New insights into establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation imprints in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2013, 368: 20110336. <\p>

[18] Franklin TB, Mansuy IM. Epigenetic inheritance in mammals: evidence for the impact of adverse environ-mental effects. Neurobiol Dis, 2010, 39(1): 61–65. <\p>

[19] Skinner MK, Haque CGBM, Nilsson E, Bhandari R, McCarrey JR. Environmentally induced transgenerational epigenetic reprogramming of primordial germ cells and the subsequent germ line. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(7): e66318. <\p>

[20] Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Zhang H, Purwar J, Carrell DT, Cairns BR. Distinctive chromatin in human sperm pack-ages genes for embryo development. Nature, 2009, 460(7254): 473–478. <\p>

[21] Brykczynska U, Hisano M, Erkek S, Ramos L, Oakeley EJ, Roloff TC, Beisel C, Schübeler D, Stadler MB, Peters AH. Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2010, 17(6): 679–687. <\p>

[22] Greer EL, Maures TJ, Ucar D, Hauswirth AG, Mancini E, Lim JP, Benayoun BA, Shi Y, Brunet A. Transgen

Outlines

/