[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Reviews

The application of genome editing in identification of plant gene function and crop breeding

Expand
  • 1. National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
    2. Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Jingzhou 434025, China

Received date: 2015-07-20

  Revised date: 2016-01-04

  Online published: 2016-03-20

Supported by

Supported by the High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No; 2012 AA10A303) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No; 91335201)

Abstract

Plant genome can be modified via current biotechnology with high specificity and excellent efficiency. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9) system are the key engineered nucleases used in the genome editing. Genome editing techniques enable gene targeted mutagenesis, gene knock-out, gene insertion or replacement at the target sites during the endogenous DNA repair process, including non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR), triggered by the induction of DNA double-strand break (DSB). Genome editing has been successfully applied in the genome modification of diverse plant species, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, and Nicotiana tabacum. In this review, we summarize the application of genome editing in identification of plant gene function and crop breeding. Moreover, we also discuss the improving points of genome editing in crop precision genetic improvement for further study.

Cite this article

Xiangchun Zhou, Yongzhong Xing . The application of genome editing in identification of plant gene function and crop breeding[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2016 , 38(3) : 227 -242 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.15-327

References

[1] Mauricio R. Mapping quantitative trait loci in plants: Uses and caveats for evolutionary biology. Nat Rev Genet , 2001, 2(5): 370-381.
[2] Jorgensen R, Matzke M, Matzke AJM. Plants, RNAi, and the nobel prize. Science , 2006, 314(5803): 1242-1243.
[3] Eamens A, Wang MB, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM. RNA silencing in plants: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Plant Physiol , 2008, 147(2): 456-468.
[4] McGinnis KM. RNAi for functional genomics in plants. Brief Funct Genomics , 2010, 9(2): 111-117.
[5] Koncz C, Németh K, Rédei GP, Schell J. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis in Arabidopsis . Plant Mol Biol , 1992, 20(5): 963-976.
[6] Krysan PJ, Young JC, Sussman MR. T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell , 1999, 11(12): 2283-2290.
[7] Jeon JS, Lee S, Jung KH, Jun SH, Jeong DH, Lee J, Kim C, Jang S, Lee S, Yang K, Nam J, An K, Han MJ, Sung RJ, Choi HS, Yu JH, Choi JH, Cho SY, Cha SS, Kim SI, An G. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice. Plant J , 2000, 22(6): 561-570.
[8] Jung KH, An G. Functional characterization of rice genes using a gene-indexed T-DNA insertional mutant population. In: Yang YN, ed. Rice Protoc. Humana Press, 2013, 956: 57-67.
[9] Thomas KR, Capecchi MR. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell , 1987, 51(3): 503-512.
[10] Capecchi MR. The new mouse genetics: Altering the genome by gene targeting. Trends Genet , 1989, 5(3): 70-76.
[11] Thomas KR, Capecchi MR. Introduction of homologous DNA sequences into mammalian cells induces mutations in the cognate gene. Nature , 1986, 324(6092): 34-38.
[12] Thomas KR, Folger KR, Capecchi MR. High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell , 1986, 44(3): 419-428.
[13] Doetschman T, Maeda N, Smithies O. Targeted mutation of the Hprt gene in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 1988, 85(22): 8583-8587.
[14] Koller BH, Smithies O. Inactivating the β 2 -microglobulin locus in mouse embryonic stem cells by homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 1989, 86(22): 8932-8935.
[15] Paszkowski J, Baur M, Bogucki A, Potrykus I. Gene targeting in plants. EMBO J , 1988, 7(13): 4021-4026.
[16] Baur M, Potrykus I, Paszkowski J. Intermolecular homologous recombination in plants. Mol Cell Biol , 1990, 10(2): 492-500.
[17] Lee KY, Lund P, Lowe K, Dunsmuir P. Homologous recombination in plant cells after Agrobacterium -mediated transformation. Plant Cell , 1990, 2(5): 415-425.
[18] Offringa R, de Groot MJA, Haagsman HJ, Does MP, van den Elzen PJM, Hooykaas PJJ. Extrachromosomal homologous recombination and gene targeting in plant cells after Agrobacterium mediated transformation. EMBO J , 1990, 9(10): 3077-3084.
[19] Halfter U, Morris PC, Willmitzer L. Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana . Mol Gen Genet , 1992, 231(2): 186-193.
[20] Swoboda P, Gal S, Hohn B, Puchta H. Intrachromosomal homologous recombination in whole plants. EMBO J , 1994, 13(2): 484-489.
[21] Miao ZH, Lam E. Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant J , 1995, 7(2): 359-365.
[22] Puchta H, Dujon B, Hohn B. Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strand breaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res , 1993, 21(22): 5034-5040.
[23] Puchta H, Dujon B, Hohn B. Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 1996, 93(10): 5055-5060.
[24] Fauser F, Roth N, Pacher M, Ilg G, Sánchez-Fernández R, Biesgen C, Puchta H. In planta gene targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2012, 109(19): 7535-7540.
[25] Wright DA, Townsend JA, Winfrey RJ, Jr., Irwin PA, Rajagopal J, Lonosky PM, Hall BD, Jondle MD, Voytas DF. High-frequency homologo
Outlines

/