Advances in site-specific integration of transgene in animal genome
Received date: 2016-11-01
Revised date: 2017-01-16
Online published: 2017-01-24
Supported by
the National Transgenic Major Projects(2016ZX08006002);Yuexi "Flying Sail Program" Postdoctoral Foundation(2015)
The traditional transgenic technologies, such as embryo microinjection, transposon-mediated integration, or lentiviral transfection, usually result in random insertions of the foreign DNA into the host genome, which could have various disadvantages in the establishment of transgenic animals. Therefore, a strategy for site-specific integration of a transgene is needed to generate genetically modified animals with accurate and identical genotypes. However, the efficiency for site-specific integration of transgene is very low, which is mainly caused by two issues. The first one is the low efficiency of inducing double-strand break (DSB) at the target site of host genome in the initial process. The second one is the low efficiency of homologous recombination repair (HDR) between the target site and the donor plasmid carrying homologous arm and foreign genes. HDR is the most common mechanism for site-specific integration of a transgene. DSBs can stimulate DNA repair mainly by two competitive mechanisms, HDR and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Hence, activation of HDR or inhibition of NHEJ can promote the HDR in the integration processes, thereby optimizing a specific targeting of the transgene. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in strategies for improving the site-specific integration of foreign transgene in transgenic technologies.
Guoling Li,Cuili Zhong,Jianxin Mo,Rong Quan,Zhenfang Wu,Zicong Li,Huaqiang Yang,Xianwei Zhang . Advances in site-specific integration of transgene in animal genome[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2017 , 39(2) : 98 -109 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.16-367
| [1] | You ZS , Shi LZ , Zhu Q , Wu P , Zhang YW , Basilio A , Tonnu N , Verma IM , Berns MW , Hunter T. CtIP links DNA double-strand break sensing to resection. Mol Cell, 2009, 36( 6): 954- 969. | |||
| [2] | Frit P , Barboule N , Yuan Y , Gomez D , Calsou P. Alternative end-joining pathway(s): bricolage at DNA breaks. DNA Repair, 2014, 17: 81- 97. | |||
| [3] | Valerie K , Povirk LF. Regulation and mechanisms of mammalian double-strand break repair. Oncogene, 2003, 22( 37): 5792- 5812. | |||
| [4] | Alshareeda AT , Negm OH , Albarakati N , Green AR , Nolan C , Sultana R , Madhusudan S , Benhasouna A , Tighe P , Ellis IO , Rakha EA. Clinicopathological significance of KU70/KU80, a key DNA damage repair protein in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2013, 139( 2): 301- 310. | |||
| [5] | Britton S , Coates J , Jackson SP. A new method for high-resolution imaging of Ku foci to decipher mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair. J Cell Biol, 2013, 202( 3): 579- 595. | |||
| [6] | Gottlieb TM , Jackson SP. The DNA-dependent protein kinase: requirement for DNA ends and association with Ku antigen. Cell, 1993, 72( 1): 131- 142. | |||
| [7] | Ma YM , Pannicke U , Schwarz K , Lieber MR. Hairpin opening and overhang processing by an artemis/DNA-dependent protein kinase complex in nonhomologous end joining and V(D)J recombination. Cell, 2002, 108( 6): 781- 794. | |||
| [8] | Burma S , Chen BPC , Chen DJ. Role of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in maintaining genomic integrity. DNA Repair, 2006, 5( 9-10): 1042- 1048. | |||
| [9] | Lieber MR. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem, 2010, 79( 1): 181- 211. | |||
| [10] | Wu PY , Frit P , Meesala S , Dauvillier S , Modesti M , Andres SN , Huang Y , Sekiguchi J , Calsou P , Salles B , Junop MS. Structural and functional interaction between the human DNA repair proteins DNA ligase IV and XRCC4. Mol Cell Mol Biol, 2009, 29( 11): 3163- 3172. | |||
| [11] | Hammel M , Rey M , Yu YP , Mani RS , Classen S , Liu MN , Pique ME , Fang SJ , Mahaney BL , Weinfeld M , Schriemer DC , Lees-Miller SP , Tainer JA. XRCC4 protein interactions XRCC4-like factor (XLF) create an extended grooved scaffold for DNA ligation and double strand break repair. J Biol Chem 2011, 286( 37): 32638- 32650. | |||
| [12] | Williams RS , Dodson GE , Limbo O , Yamada Y , Williams JS , Guenther G , Classen S , Glover JNM , Iwasaki H , Russell P , Tainer JA. Nbs1 flexibly tethers Ctp1 and Mre11-Rad50 to coordinate DNA double-strand break processing and repair. Cell, 2009, 139( 1): 87- 99. | |||
| [13] | Cruz-García A , López-Saavedra A , Huertas P. BRCA1 accelerates CtIP-mediated DNA-end resection. Cell Rep, 2014, 9( 2): 451- 459.
/
|