[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Original article

The diversity of DNA fragment editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in highly homologous or repetitive sequences

Expand
  • Center for Comparative Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Institute of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received date: 2017-01-16

  Revised date: 2017-02-28

  Online published: 2017-03-08

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31470820,81302861)

Abstract

In complex genomes, there are a large number of duplicated genes in the coding regions and many more repetitive sequences in the non-coding regions. Repetitive sequences can exert great impacts on the heredity and evolution of the organisms, as well as their genome 3D architecture and transcriptional regulation. The high homology nature of repetitive sequences renders their editing by CRISPR/Cas9 very complex. At diploid or polyploid situations, such repetitive sequences could be edited differently on each chromosome or chromatid. To explore such possibilities, we had studied the editing of two highly homologous DNA fragments (L1 and L2), each about 300 bp in size and 11 kb apart on the same chromosome. We designed a pair of sgRNAs targeting the upstream and downstream of the two DNA fragments to guide the Cas9 cleavage of the two fragments in the human HepG2 cells. We further established single-cell CRISPR clones for DNA-fragment-edited cells. A total of 22 CRISPR cell clones were characterized for their DNA fragment editing patterns. In addition to the deletion of L1/L2 fragments, we had also identified the deletion of the large internal fragment between L1 and L2 fragments, and the various combinations of inversions and deletions of the three DNA fragments. Our results have demonstrated the potential issues with important implications for using CRISPR/Cas9 to edit duplicated genes or repetitive sequences in diploid or polyploid species or cell lines.

Cite this article

Leyang Wang,Haiyan Huang,Qiang Wu . The diversity of DNA fragment editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in highly homologous or repetitive sequences[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2017 , 39(4) : 313 -325 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.17-019

References

[1] Zarrei M, MacDonald JR, Merico D, Scherer SW. A copy number variation map of the human genome. Nat Rev Genet, 2015, 16(3): 172-183.
[2] Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Dunning M, Ingle CE, Beazley C, Thorne N, Redon R, Bird CP, de Grassi A, Lee C, Tyler-Smith C, Carter N, Scherer SW, Tavare S, Deloukas P, Hurles ME, Dermitzakis ET. Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science, 2007, 315(5813): 848-853.
[3] Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, Andrews TD, Fiegler H, Shapero MH, Carson AR, Chen WW, Cho EK, Dallaire S, Freeman JL, González JR, Gratacòs M, Huang J, Kalaitzopoulos D, Komura D, MacDonald JR, Marshall CR, Mei R, Montgomery L, Nishimura K, Okamura K, Shen F, Somerville MJ, Tchinda J, Valsesia A, Woodwark C, Yang FT, Zhang JJ, Zerjal T, Zhang J, Armengol L, Conrad DF, Estivill X, Tyler-Smith C, Carter NP, Aburatani H, Lee C, Jones KW, Scherer SW, Hurles ME. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature, 2006, 444(7118): 444-454.
[4] Maillard AM, Ruef A, Pizzagalli F, Migliavacca E, Hippolyte L, Adaszewski S, Dukart J, Ferrari C, Conus P, M?nnik K, Zazhytska M, Siffredi V, Maeder P, Kutalik Z, Kherif F, Hadjikhani N, 16p11.2 European Consortium, Beckmann JS, Reymond A, Draganski B, Jacquemont S. The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity. Mol Psychiatry, 2015, 20(1): 140-147.
[5] Horev G, Ellegood J, Lerch JP, Son YEE, Muthuswamy L, Vogel H, Krieger AM, Buja A, Henkelman RM, Wigler M, Mills AA. Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108(41): 17076-17081.
[6] Cooper GM, Coe BP, Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Vu T, Baker C, Williams C, Stalker H, Hamid R, Hannig V, Abdel-Hamid H, Bader P, McCracken E, Niyazov D, Leppig K, Thiese H, Hummel M, Alexander N, Gorski J, Kussmann J, Shashi V, Johnson K, Rehder C, Ballif B C, Shaffer L G, Eichler EE. A copy number variation morbidity map of developmental delay. Nat Genet, 2011, 43(9): 838-846.
[7] de Koning APJ, Gu WJ, Castoe TA, Batzer MA, Pollock DD. Repetitive elements may comprise over two-thirds of the human genome. PLoS Genet, 2011, 7(12): e1002384.
[8] Coufal NG, Garcia-Perez JL, Peng GE, Yeo GW, Mu YL, Lovci MT, Morell M, O'Shea KS, Moran JV, Gage FH. L1 retrotransposition in human neural progenitor cells. Nature, 2009, 460(7259): 1127-1131.
[9] Gerstein MB, Bruce C, Rozowsky JS, Zheng DY, Du J, Korbel JO, Emanuelsson O, Zhang ZD, Weissman S, Snyder M. What is a gene, post-ENCODE? History and updated definition. Genome Res, 2007, 17(6): 669-681.
[10] Shapiro JA, Von Sternberg R. Why repetitive DNA is essential to genome function. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 2005, 80(2): 227-250.
[11] Cournac A, Koszul R, Mozziconacci J. The 3D folding of metazoan genomes correlates with the association of similar repetitive elements. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016
Outlines

/