[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Research Articles

Assessing abundance and specificity of different types of sgRNA targeting miRNA precursors

Expand
  • 1. Key Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding, and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    2. Department of Basic Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    3. The Cooperative Innovation Center for Sustainable Pig Production, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received date: 2018-01-23

  Revised date: 2018-04-27

  Online published: 2018-06-15

Supported by

Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, Stem Cell and Translational Research(2016YFA0100203);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2662018JC002);the National Transgenic Project of China(2016ZX08006003-004);Students Research Fund(2016048)

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas technology enables efficient and specific editing the genome. Since different bacterial sources or artificially modified Cas9, as well as Cpf1 and other nucleases, recognize different PAMs (protospacer adjacent motifs), different gene editing nucleases may use different types of sgRNAs (small guide RNA). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of regulatory small non-coding RNAs. To determine whether specific targets for sgRNAs in miRNA precursor exit, the abundance and specificity of 11 different types of sgRNA targeting 28 645 miRNA precursors were analyzed in the present study using the CRISPR-offinder, a bioinformatics software developed in our own laboratory. The CRISPR/Cas9 lentivirus technology was used to target the miR-302/367 cluster in a porcine cell line, and its knockout efficiency for the miRNA target was evaluated. The results show that there are about 8 different types of sgRNAs that can target individual miRNA precursors. By assessing the off-target effect, only 18.2% of the sgRNAs showed high specificity for targeting the porcine miRNA precursors. Lastly, using the miR-302/367 cluster target as an example, we showed that the CRISPR/Cas9 lentivirus technology was 40% efficient in successfully establishing correct knockout of the target miRNA in the porcine cell line. This present study provides an important resource for the use of CRISPR/Cas technology to target miRNAs for knockout studies.

Key words: pig; miRNA; CRISPR/Cas9; sgRNA; knockout

Cite this article

Hailong Liu, Yang Shen, Yang Gao, Ling Zhou, Xiaosong Han, Changzhi Zhao, Gaojuan Yang, Yilong Chen, Hui Yang, Shengsong Xie . Assessing abundance and specificity of different types of sgRNA targeting miRNA precursors[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2018 , 40(7) : 561 -571 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.17-417

References

[1] Ambros V . microRNAs: tiny regulators with great potential. Cell, 2001,107(7):823-826.
[2] Lai EC . Micro RNAs are complementary to 3° UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation. Nat Genet, 2002,30(4):363-364.
[3] Kozomara A , Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014,42(Database issue):D68-D73.
[4] Lau NC, Lim LP, Weinstein EG, Bartel DP . An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 2001,294(5543):858-862.
[5] Lee Y, Jeon K, Lee JT, Kim S, Kim VN . MicroRNA maturation: stepwise processing and subcellular localization. EMBO J, 2002,21(17):4663-4670.
[6] Nishimura K, Ohtaka M, Takada H, Kurisaki A, Tran NVK, Tran YTH, Hisatake K, Sano M, Nakanishi M . Simple and effective generation of transgene-free induced pluripotent stem cells using an auto-erasable Sendai virus vector responding to microRNA-302. Stem Cell Res, 2017,23:13-9.
[7] Barroso-del Jesus A, Lucena-Aguilar G, Menendez P . The miR-302-367 cluster as a potential stemness regulator in ESCs. Cell Cycle, 2009,8(3):394-398.
[8] Lin SL, Chang DC, Lin CH, Ying SY, Leu D, Wu DT . Regulation of somatic cell reprogramming through inducible mir-302 expression. Nucleic Acids Res, 2011,39(3):1054-1065.
[9] Li Z, Yang CS, Nakashima K, Rana TM . Small RNA-mediated regulation of iPS cell generation. EMBO J, 2011,30(5):823-834.
[10] Pu JY, Wu SY, Xie HP, Li YY, Yang ZC, Wu XW, Huang X. miR-146a Inhibits dengue-virus-induced autophagy by targeting TRAF6. Arch Virol, 2017,162(12):3645-3659.
[11] Magilnick N, Reyes EY, Wang WL, Vonderfecht SL, Gohda J, Inoue JI, Boldin MP. miR-146a-Traf6 regulatory axis controls autoimmunity and myelopoiesis, but is dispensable for hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis and tumor suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017,114(34):E7140-E7149.
[12] Horak M, Novak J, Bienertova-Vasku J . Muscle-specific microRNAs in skeletal muscle development. Dev Biol, 2016,410(1):1-13.
[13] Ma WB, Hu SG, Yao GX, Xie SS, Ni MJ, Liu Q, Gao XX, Zhang J, Huang XX, Zhang YL . An androgen receptor-microrna-29a regulatory circuitry in mouse epididymis. J Biol Chem, 2013,288(41):29369-29381.
[14] Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C, Maeder ML, Reyon D, Joung JK, Sander JD . High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol, 2013,31(9):822-826.
[15] Xie SS, Zhang Y, Zhang LS, Li GL, Zhao CZ, Ni P, Zhao SH. sgRNA design for the C
Outlines

/