[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Reviews

Application of machine learning in the CRISPR/Cas9 system

Expand
  • School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received date: 2018-05-15

  Revised date: 2018-07-19

  Online published: 2018-07-30

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(61872396)

Abstract

The third generation of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome fixed-point editing technology has been widely used in the field of gene editing and gene expression regulation. How to improve the on-target efficiency and specificity of this system, as well as reduce its off-target effects are always the bottleneck in its development. Machine learning provides novel methods to the problems of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, and CRISPR/Cas9-based machine learning has recently become a very hot research topic. In this review, we firstly outline the mechanism of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Subsequently, we elaborate the current issues of CRISPR/Cas9, including low efficiency and potential off-target effects, and sequence-recognizing limitation from protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). Finally, we summarize the applications of methods within the machine learning framework for optimizing the CRISPR/Cas9 system, such as optimized single-guide RNA (sgRNA) design, CRISPR/Cas9 cleavage efficiency prediction, off-target effects evaluation, gene knock-out as well as high-throughput functional genetic screening and prospects for development.

Cite this article

Zhang Guishan, Yang Yong, Zhang Lingmin, Dai Xianhua . Application of machine learning in the CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2018 , 40(9) : 704 -723 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.18-135

References

[1] Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini L, Zhang F . Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 2013,339(6121):819-823.
[2] Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA . RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol, 2013,31(3):233-239.
[3] Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F . Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 2014,157(6):1262-1278.
[4] Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C, Maeder ML, Reyon D, Joung JK, Sander JD . High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol, 2013,31(9):822-826.
[5] Pattanayak V, Lin S, Guilinger JP, Ma E, Doudna JA, Liu DR . High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol, 2013,31(9):839-843.
[6] Wong N, Liu W, Wang X . WU-CRISPR: characteristics of functional guide RNAs for the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Genome Biol, 2015,16:218.
[7] Hinz JM, Laughery MF, Wyrick JJ . Nucleosomes inhibit Cas9 endonuclease activity in vitro. Biochemistry, 2015,54(48):7063-7066.
[8] Horlbeck MA, Gilbert LA, Villalta JE, Adamson B, Pak RA, Chen Y, Fields AP, Park CY, Corn JE, Kampmann M, Weissman JS . Compact and highly active next- generation libraries for CRISPR-mediated gene repression and activation. Elife, 2016,5:e19760.
[9] Lee CM, Davis TH, Bao G . Examination of CRISPR/ Cas9 design tools and the effect of target site accessibility on Cas9 activity. Exp Physiol, 2017,103(4):456-460.
[10] Isaac RS, Jiang FG, Doudna JA, Lim WA, Narlikar GJ, Almeida R . Nucleosome breathing and remodeling constrain CRISPR-Cas9 function. Elife, 2016,5:e13450.
[11] Kosicki M, Tomberg K, Bradley A . Repair of double- strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat Biotechnol, 2018,36(8):765-771.
[12] Goldberg DE. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1989.
[13] Listgarten J, Weinstein M, Kleinstiver BP, Sousa AA, Joung JK, Crawford J, Gao K, Hoang L, Elibol M, Doench JG, Fusi N . Prediction of off-target activities for the end-to-end design of CRISPR guide RNAs. Nat Biomed Eng, 2018,2(1):38-47.
[14] Kim HK, Min S, Song M, Jung S, Choi JW, Kim Y, Lee S, Yoon S, Kim HH . Deep learning improves prediction of CRISPR-Cpf1 guide RNA activity. Nat Biotechnol, 2018,36(3):239-241.
[15] Lin Y, Cradick TJ, Brown MT, Deshmu
Outlines

/