The protocol of tagging endogenous proteins with fluorescent tags using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing
Received date: 2022-12-02
Revised date: 2023-01-06
Online published: 2023-01-09
Supported by
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(91957106);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31970659);the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China(2021YFA0804802);the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China(2022YFA1304500)
The currently widely used CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology enables the editing of target genes (knock-out or knock-in) with high accuracy and efficiency. Guided by the small guide RNA, the Cas9 nuclease induces a DNA double-strand break at the targeted genomic locus. The DNA double-strand break can be repaired by the homology-directed repair pathway in the presence of a repair template. With the repair template containing the coding sequence of a fluorescent tag, the targeted gene can be inserted with the sequence of a fluorescent tag at the designed position. The genome editing mediated labeling of endogenous proteins with fluorescent tags avoids the potential artifacts caused by gene overexpression and substantially improves the reproductivity of imaging experiments. This protocol focuses on creating mammalian cell lines with endogenous proteins tagged with fluorescent proteins or self-labeling protein tags using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.
Zhongsheng Wu, Yu Gao, Yongtao Du, Song Dang, Kangmin He . The protocol of tagging endogenous proteins with fluorescent tags using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2023 , 45(2) : 165 -175 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.22-395
| [1] | Schneider AFL, Hackenberger CPR. Fluorescent labelling in living cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2017, 48: 61-68. |
| [2] | Crivat G, Taraska JW. Imaging proteins inside cells with fluorescent tags. Trends Biotechnol, 2012, 30(1): 8-16. |
| [3] | Cranfill PJ, Sell BR, Baird MA, Allen JR, Lavagnino Z, de Gruiter HM, Kremers GJ, Davidson MW, Ustione A, Piston DW. Quantitative assessment of fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods, 2016, 13(7): 557-562. |
| [4] | Hirano M, Ando R, Shimozono S, Sugiyama M, Takeda N, Kurokawa H, Deguchi R, Endo K, Haga K, Takai-Todaka R, Inaura S, Matsumura Y, Hama H, Okada Y, Fujiwara T, Morimoto T, Katayama K, Miyawaki A. A highly photostable and bright green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol, 2022, 40(7): 1132-1142. |
| [5] | Los GV, Encell LP, McDougall MG, Hartzell DD, Karassina N, Zimprich C, Wood MG, Learish R, Ohana RF, Urh M, Simpson D, Mendez J, Zimmerman K, Otto P, Vidugiris G, Zhu J, Darzins A, Klaubert DH, Bulleit RF, Wood KV. HaloTag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. ACS Chem Biol, 2008, 3(6): 373-382. |
| [6] | Hoelzel CA, Zhang X. Visualizing and manipulating biological processes by using HaloTag and SNAP-Tag technologies. Chembiochem, 2020, 21(14): 1935-1946. |
| [7] | Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc, 2013, 8(11): 2281-2308. |
| [8] | Tamura R, Kamiyama D. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knock- in approach to insert the GFP11 tag into the genome of a human cell line. Methods Mol Biol, 2023, 2564: 185-201. |
| [9] | Surve S, Sorkin A. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of HeLa cells to tag proteins with mNeonGreen. Bio Protoc, 2022, 12(10): e4415. |
| [10] | Koch B, Nijmeijer B, Kueblbeck M, Cai Y, Walther N, Ellenberg J. Generation and validation of homozygous fluorescent knock-in cells using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Nat Protoc, 2018, 13(6): 1465-1487. |
| [11] | Cabantous S, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS. Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol, 2005, 23(1): 102-107. |
| [12] | Feng SY, Sekine S, Pessino V, Li H, Leonetti MD, Huang B. Improved split fluorescent proteins for endogenous protein labeling. Nat Commun, 2017, 8(1): 370. |
| [13] | Alford SC, Ding YD, Simmen T, Campbell RE. Dimerization-dependent green and yellow fluorescent proteins. ACS Synth Biol, 2012, 1(12): 569-575. |
| [14] | Rodriguez EA, Campbell RE, Lin JY, Lin MZ, Miyawaki A, Palmer AE, Shu XK, Zhang J, Tsien RY. The growing and glowing toolbox of fluorescent and photoactive proteins. Trends Biochem Sci, 2017, 42(2): 111-129. |
| [15] | Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, Falkow S. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene, 1996, 173(1 Spec No):33-38. |
| [16] | Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC, Tsien RY. Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science, 2002, 296(5569): 913-916. |
| [17] | Shaner NC, Lambert GG, Chammas A, Ni YH, Cranfill PJ, Baird MA, Sell BR, Allen JR, Day RN, Israelsson M, Davidson MW, Wang JW. A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Nat Methods, 2013, 10(5): 407-409. |
| [18] | Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BNG, Palmer AE, Tsien RY. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol, 2004, 22(12): 1567-1572. |
| [19] | Merzlyak EM, Goedhart J, Shcherbo D, Bulina ME, Shcheglov AS, Fradkov AF, Gaintzeva A, Lukyanov KA, Lukyanov S, Gadella TWJ, Chudakov DM. Bright monomeric red fluorescent protein with an extended fluorescence lifetime. Nat Methods, 2007, 4(7): 555-557. |
| [20] | Bindels DS, Haarbosch L, van Weeren L, Postma M, Wiese KE, Mastop M, Aumonier S, Gotthard G, Royant A, Hink MA, Gadella TWJ. mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat Methods, 2017, 14(1): 53-56. |
| [21] | Mukherjee S, Hung ST, Douglas N, Manna P, Thomas C, Ekrem A, Palmer AE, Jimenez R. Engineering of a brighter variant of the fusionRed fluorescent protein using lifetime Flow Cytometry and structure-guided mutations. Biochemistry, 2020, 59(39): 3669-3682. |
| [22] | Leonetti MD, Sekine S, Kamiyama D, Weissman JS, Huang B. A scalable strategy for high-throughput GFP tagging of endogenous human proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2016, 113(25): E3501-E3508. |
| [23] | Los GV, Wood K. The HaloTag: a novel technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. Methods Mol Biol, 2007, 356: 195-208. |
| [24] | Keppler A, Gendreizig S, Gronemeyer T, Pick H, Vogel H, Johnsson K. A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat Biotechnol, 2003, 21(1): 86-89. |
| [25] | Juillerat A, Gronemeyer T, Keppler A, Gendreizig S, Pick H, Vogel H, Johnsson K. Directed evolution of O6- alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase for efficient labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Chem Biol, 2003, 10(4): 313-317. |
| [26] | Gautier A, Juillerat A, Heinis C, Corrêa IR, Kindermann M, Beaufils F, Johnsson K. An engineered protein tag for multiprotein labeling in living cells. Chem Biol, 2008, 15(2): 128-136. |
| [27] | Grimm JB, Brown TA, English BP, Lionnet T, Lavis LD. Synthesis of Janelia Fluor HaloTag and SNAP-Tag ligands and their use in cellular imaging experiments. Methods Mol Biol, 2017, 1663: 179-188. |
| [28] | Trinh R, Gurbaxani B, Morrison SL, Seyfzadeh M. Optimization of codon pair use within the (GGGGS)3 linker sequence results in enhanced protein expression. Mol Immunol, 2004, 40(10): 717-722. |
| [29] | van Rosmalen M, Krom M, Merkx M. Tuning the flexibility of glycine-serine linkers to allow rational design of multidomain proteins. Biochemistry, 2017, 56(50): 6565-6574. |
| [30] | Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. Cas9- crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109(39): E2579-E2586. |
| [31] | Bukhari H, Müller T. Endogenous fluorescence tagging by CRISPR. Trends Cell Biol, 2019, 29(11): 912-928. |
| [32] | Ratz M, Testa I, Hell SW, Jakobs S. CRISPR/Cas9- mediated endogenous protein tagging for RESOLFT super-resolution microscopy of living human cells. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 9592. |
| [33] | Hendel A, Kildebeck EJ, Fine EJ, Clark J, Punjya N, Sebastiano V, Bao G, Porteus MH. Quantifying genome- editing outcomes at endogenous loci with SMRT sequencing. Cell Rep, 2014, 7(1): 293-305. |
| [34] | Paquet D, Kwart D, Chen A, Sproul A, Jacob S, Teo S, Olsen KM, Gregg A, Noggle S, Tessier-Lavigne M.Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9. Nature, 2016, 533(7601): 125-129. |
| [35] | Concordet JP, Haeussler M. CRISPOR: intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018, 46(W1): W242-W245. |
| [36] | Doench JG, Fusi N, Sullender M, Hegde M, Vaimberg EW, Donovan KF, Smith I, Tothova Z, Wilen C, Orchard R, Virgin HW, Listgarten J, Root DE.Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol, 2016, 34(2): 184-191. |
| [37] | He KM, Marsland R, Upadhyayula S, Song E, Dang S, Capraro BR, Wang WM, Skillern W, Gaudin R, Ma MH, Kirchhausen T. Dynamics of phosphoinositide conversion in clathrin-mediated endocytic traffic. Nature, 2017, 552(7685): 410-414. |
| [38] | He KM, Song E, Upadhyayula S, Dang S, Gaudin R, Skillern W, Bu K, Capraro BR, Rapoport I, Kusters I, Ma MH, Kirchhausen T. Dynamics of Auxilin 1 and GAK in clathrin-mediated traffic. J Cell Biol, 2020, 219(3): e201908142. |
| [39] | Li GL, Yang SX, Wu ZF, Zhang XW. Recent developments in enhancing the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in animals. Hereditas(Beijing), 2020, 42(7): 641-656. |
| [39] | 李国玲, 杨善欣, 吴珍芳, 张献伟. 提高CRISPR/Cas9介导的动物基因组精确插入效率研究进展. 遗传, 2020, 42(7): 641-656. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |