[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Technique and Method

Gut metagenome-derived image augmentation and deep learning improve prediction accuracy of metabolic disease classification

Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China

Received date: 2024-06-15

  Revised date: 2024-08-01

  Online published: 2024-08-08

Supported by

Joint Research on Improved Livestock and Poultry Breeds in Anhui Province(2021-2025)

Abstract

In recent years, statistics and machine learning methods have been widely used to analyze the relationship between human gut microbial metagenome and metabolic diseases, which is of great significance for the functional annotation and development of microbial communities. In this study, we proposed a new and scalable framework for image enhancement and deep learning of gut metagenome, which could be used in the classification of human metabolic diseases. Each data sample in three representative human gut metagenome datasets was transformed into image and enhanced, and put into the machine learning models of logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), Bayesian network (BN) and random forest (RF), and the deep learning models of multilayer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN). The accuracy performance of the overall evaluation model for disease prediction was verified by accuracy (A), accuracy (P), recall (R), F1 score (F1), area under ROC curve (AUC) and 10 fold cross-validation. The results showed that the overall performance of MLP model was better than that of CNN, LR, SVM, BN, RF and PopPhy-CNN, and the performance of MLP and CNN models was further improved after data enhancement (random rotation and adding salt-and-pepper noise). The accuracy of MLP model in disease prediction was further improved by 4%-11%, F1 by 1%-6% and AUC by 5%-10%. The above results showed that human gut metagenome image enhancement and deep learning could accurately extract microbial characteristics and effectively predict the host disease phenotype. The source code and datasets used in this study can be publicly accessed in https://github.com/HuaXWu/GM_ML_Classification.git.

Cite this article

Huiyi Zheng, Huaxuan Wu, Zhiqiang Du . Gut metagenome-derived image augmentation and deep learning improve prediction accuracy of metabolic disease classification[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2024 , 46(10) : 886 -896 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.24-086

References

[1] B?ckhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper LV, Koh GY, Nagy A, Semenkovich CF, Gordon JI. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101(44): 15718-15723.
[2] Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature, 2006, 444(7122): 1027-1031.
[3] Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature, 2006, 444(7122): 1022-1023.
[4] Tremaroli V, B?ckhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature, 2012, 489(7415): 242-249.
[5] Fan Y, Pedersen O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2021, 19(1): 55-71.
[6] Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature, 2009, 457(7228): 480-484.
[7] Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Cheng JY, Duncan AE, Kau AL, Griffin NW, Lombard V, Henrissat B, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Ilkayeva O, Semenkovich CF, Funai K, Hayashi DK, Lyle BJ, Martini MC, Ursell LK, Clemente JC, Van Treuren W, Walters WA, Knight R, Newgard CB, Heath AC, Gordon JI. Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice. Science, 2013, 341(6150): 1241214.
[8] Zeevi D, Korem T, Godneva A, Bar N, Kurilshikov A, Lotan-Pompan M, Weinberger A, Fu JY, Wijmenga C, Zhernakova A, Segal E. Structural variation in the gut microbiome associates with host health. Nature, 2019, 568(7750): 43-48.
[9] Kurilshikov A, Medina-Gomez C, Bacigalupe R, Radjabzadeh D, Wang J, Demirkan A, Le Roy CI, Raygoza Garay JA, Finnicum CT, Liu XR, Zhernakova DV, Bonder MJ, Hansen TH, Frost F, Rühlemann MC, Turpin W, Moon JY, Kim HN, Lüll K, Barkan E, Shah SA, Fornage M, Szopinska-Tokov J, Wallen ZD, Borisevich D, Agreus L, Andreasson A, Bang C, Bedrani L, Bell JT, Bisgaard H, Boehnke M, Boomsma DI, Burk RD, Claringbould A, Croitoru K, Davies GE, van Duijn CM, Duijts L, Falony G, Fu JY, van der Graaf A, Hansen T, Homuth G, Hughes DA, Ijzerman RG, Jackson MA, Jaddoe VWV, Joossens M, J?rgensen T, Keszthelyi D, Knight R, Laakso M, Laudes M, Launer LJ, Lieb W, Lusis AJ, Masclee AAM, Moll HA, Mujagic Z, Qibin Q, Rothschild D, Shin H, S?rensen SJ, Steves CJ, Thorsen J, Timpson NJ, Tito RY, Vieira-Silva S, V?lker U, V?lzke H, V?sa U, Wade KH, Walter S, Watanabe K, Weiss S, Weiss FU, Weissbrod O, Westra HJ, Willemsen G, Payami H, Jonkers DMAE, Arias Vasquez A, de Geus EJC, Meyer KA, Stokholm J, Segal E, Org E, Wijmenga C, Kim HL, Kaplan RC, Spector TD, Uitterlinden AG, Rivadeneira F, Franke A, Lerch MM, Franke L, Sanna S, D'Amato M, Pedersen O, Paterson AD, Kraaij R, Raes J, Zhernakova A. Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition. Nat Genet, 2021, 53(2): 156-165.
[10] Lopera-Maya EA, Kurilshikov A, van der Graaf A, Hu SX, Andreu-Sánchez S, Chen LM, Vila AV, Gacesa R, Sinha T, Collij V, Klaassen MAY, Bolte LA, Gois MFB, Neerincx PBT, Swertz MA, LifeLines Cohort Study, Harmsen HJM, Wijmenga C, Fu JY, Weersma RK, Zhernakova A, Sanna S. Effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome in 7,738 participants of the Dutch Microbiome Project. Nat Genet, 2022, 54(2): 143-151.
[11] Chen LM, Zhernakova DV, Kurilshikov A, Andreu- Sánchez S, Wang DM, Augustijn HE, Vich Vila A, Lifelines Cohort Study, Weersma RK, Medema MH, Netea MG, Kuipers F, Wijmenga C, Zhernakova A, Fu JY. Influence of the microbiome, diet and genetics on inter-individual variation in the human plasma metabolome. Nat Med, 2022, 28(11): 2333-2343.
[12] Sanna S, Kurilshikov A, van der Graaf A, Fu JY, Zhernakova A. Challenges and future directions for studying effects of host genetics on the gut microbiome. Nat Genet, 2022, 54(2): 100-106.
[13] Kim G, Yoon Y, Park JH, Park JW, Noh MG, Kim H, Park C, Kwon H, Park JH, Kim Y, Sohn J, Park S, Kim H, Im SK, Kim Y, Chung HY, Nam MH, Kwon JY, Kim IY, Kim YJ, Baek JH, Kim HS, Weinstock GM, Cho B, Lee C, Fang S, Park H, Seong JK. Bifidobacterial carbohydrate/ nucleoside metabolism enhances oxidative phosphorylation in white adipose tissue to protect against diet-induced obesity. Microbiome, 2022, 10(1): 188.
[14] Khan S, Hauptman R, Kelly L. Engineering the microbiome to prevent adverse events: challenges and opportunities. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 2021, 61: 159-179.
[15] Giliberti R, Cavaliere S, Mauriello IE, Ercolini D, Pasolli E. Host phenotype classification from human microbiome data is mainly driven by the presence of microbial taxa. PLoS Comput Biol, 2022, 18(4): e1010066.
[16] LaPierre N, Ju CJT, Zhou GY, Wang W. MetaPheno: a critical evaluation of deep learning and machine learning in metagenome-based disease prediction. Methods, 2019, 166: 74-82.
[17] Aryal S, Alimadadi A, Manandhar I, Joe B, Cheng X. Machine learning strategy for gut microbiome-based diagnostic screening of cardiovascular disease. Hypertension, 2020, 76(5): 1555-1562.
[18] Marcos-Zambrano LJ, Karaduzovic-Hadziabdic K, Loncar Turukalo T, Przymus P, Trajkovik V, Aasmets O, Berland M, Gruca A, Hasic J, Hron K, Klammsteiner T, Kolev M, Lahti L, Lopes MB, Moreno V, Naskinova I, Org E, Paciência I, Papoutsoglou G, Shigdel R, Stres B, Vilne B, Yousef M, Zdravevski E, Tsamardinos I, Carrillo de Santa Pau E, Claesson MJ, Moreno-Indias I, Truu J. Applications of machine learning in human microbiome studies: a review on feature selection, biomarker identification, disease prediction and treatment. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12: 634511.
[19] Holmes S. Successful strategies for human microbiome data generation, storage and analyses. J Biosci, 2019, 44(5): 111.
[20] Galloway-Pe?a J, Hanson B. Tools for analysis of the microbiome. Dig Dis Sci, 2020, 65(3): 674-685.
[21] Clausen DS, Willis AD. Evaluating replicability in microbiome data. Biostatistics, 2022, 23(4): 1099-1114.
[22] Datta S, Guha S. Statistical Analysis of Microbiome Data. Springer International Publishing, 2021.
[23] Zhang XY, Mallick H, Tang ZX, Zhang L, Cui XQ, Benson AK, Yi NJ. Negative binomial mixed models for analyzing microbiome count data. BMC Bioinformatics, 2017, 18(1): 4.
[24] Zhang XY, Yi NJ. NBZIMM: negative binomial and zero-inflated mixed models, with application to microbiome/metagenomics data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 2020, 21(1): 488.
[25] Liu TT, Xu PR, Du YY, Lu H, Zhao HY, Wang T. MZINBVA: variational approximation for multilevel zero-inflated negative-binomial models for association analysis in microbiome surveys. Brief Bioinform, 2022, 23(1): bbab443.
[26] Curry KD, Nute MG, Treangen TJ. It takes guts to learn: machine learning techniques for disease detection from the gut microbiome. Emerg Top Life Sci, 2021, 5(6): 815-827.
[27] Vilne B, ?ibilds J, Siksna I, Lazda I, Valci?a O, Krūmi?a A. Could artificial intelligence/machine learning and inclusion of diet-gut microbiome interactions improve disease risk prediction? case study: coronary artery disease. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13: 627892.
[28] Li Y, Xu ZL, Han WK, Cao HL, Umarov R, Yan AX, Fan M, Chen H, Duarte CM, Li LH, Ho PL, Gao X. HMD-ARG: hierarchical multi-task deep learning for annotating antibiotic resistance genes. Microbiome, 2021, 9(1): 40.
[29] Cai Y, Gu H, Kenney T. Learning microbial community structures with supervised and unsupervised non-negative matrix factorization. Microbiome, 2017, 5(1): 110.
[30] Chen D, Wang SJ, Zhao ZJ, Ji X, Shen Q, Yu Y, Cui SD, Wang JG, Chen ZY, Wang JY, Guo ZY, Wu PX, Tang GQ. Genomic prediction of pig growth traits based on machine learning. Hereditas(Beijing), 2023, 45(10): 922-932.
  陈栋, 王书杰, 赵真坚, 姬祥, 申琦, 余杨, 崔晟頔, 王俊戈, 陈子旸, 王金勇, 郭宗义, 吴平先, 唐国庆. 基于机器学习的猪生长性状基因组预测. 遗传, 2023, 45(10): 922-932.
[31] Liu B, Str?uber H, Saraiva J, Harms H, Silva SG, Kasmanas JC, Kleinsteuber S, Nunes da Rocha U. Machine learning-assisted identification of bioindicators predicts medium-chain carboxylate production performance of an anaerobic mixed culture. Microbiome, 2022, 10(1): 48.
[32] Vangay P, Hillmann BM, Knights D. Microbiome Learning Repo (ML Repo): a public repository of microbiome regression and classification tasks. Gigascience, 2019, 8(5): giz042.
[33] Reiman D, Metwally AA, Sun J, Dai Y. PopPhy-CNN: a phylogenetic tree embedded architecture for convolutional neural networks to predict host phenotype from metagenomic data. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2020, 24(10): 2993-3001.
[34] Sharma A, Vans E, Shigemizu D, Boroevich KA, Tsunoda T. DeepInsight: a methodology to transform a non-image data to an image for convolution neural network architecture. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 11399.
[35] Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res, 2011, 12(85): 2825-2830.
[36] Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin ZM, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, Desmaison A, K?pf A, Yang E, DeVito Z, Raison M, Tejani A, Chilamkurthy S, Steiner B, Fang L, Bai JJ, Chintala S. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2019, 32: 8024-8035.
[37] Zhang XH, Zou YX, Shi W. Dilated convolution neural network with LeakyReLU for environmental sound classification. The 22nd International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), 2017, 1-5.
[38] Wen CL, Sun CJ, Yang N. The concepts and research progress: from heritability to microbiability. Hereditas(Beijing), 2019, 41(11): 1023-1040.
  文超良, 孙从佼, 杨宁. 从遗传力到肠菌力:概念及研究进展. 遗传, 2019, 41(11): 1023-1040.
[39] Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia YQ, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A. Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015, 1-9.
[40] He KM, Zhang XY, Ren SQ, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, 770-778.
[41] Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM, 2017, 60(6): 84-90.
[42] Shorten C, Khoshgoftaar TM. A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. J Big Data, 2019, 6(1): 1-48.
[43] Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y. Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM, 2020, 63(11): 139-144.
[44] Chen XN, Chen DG, Zhao ZM, Balko JM, Chen JC. Artificial image objects for classification of breast cancer biomarkers with transcriptome sequencing data and convolutional neural network algorithms. Breast Cancer Res, 2021, 23(1): 96.
[45] Chen XN, Chen DG, Zhao ZM, Zhan J, Ji CR, Chen JC. Artificial image objects for classification of schizophrenia with GWAS-selected SNVs and convolutional neural network. Patterns (NY), 2021, 2(8): 100303.
[46] Tang H, Yu XT, Liu R, Zeng T. Vec2image: an explainable artificial intelligence model for the feature representation and classification of high-dimensional biological data by vector-to-image conversion. Brief Bioinform, 2022, 23(2): bbab584.
[47] He T, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Zhang ZY, Xie JY, Li M. Bag of tricks for image classification with convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019, 558-567.
[48] Aasmets O, Lüll K, Lang JM, Pan C, Kuusisto J, Fischer K, Laakso M, Lusis AJ, Org E. Machine learning reveals time-varying microbial predictors with complex effects on glucose regulation. mSystems, 2021, 6(1): e01191-20.
[49] Kodikara S, Ellul S, Lê Cao KA. Statistical challenges in longitudinal microbiome data analysis. Brief Bioinform, 2022, 23(4): bbac273.
[50] Wang C, Segal LN, Hu JY, Zhou BY, Hayes RB, Ahn J, Li HL. Microbial risk score for capturing microbial characteristics, integrating multi-omics data, and predicting disease risk. Microbiome, 2022, 10(1): 121.
[51] Corander J, Hanage WP, Pensar J. Causal discovery for the microbiome. Lancet Microbe, 2022, 3(11): e881-e887.
[52] Xu YW, Nash K, Acharjee A, Gkoutos GV. CACONET: a novel classification framework for microbial correlation networks. Bioinformatics, 2022, 38(6): 1639-1647.
Outlines

/