[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Opinion

Examining funding policies for postdoctoral researchers in life sciences: a case study of Shandong University

Expand
  • School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China

Received date: 2025-06-18

  Revised date: 2025-07-19

  Online published: 2025-07-28

Supported by

Shandong University Key Project for Undergraduate Education Teaching Reform(2024Z20)

Abstract

Postdoctoral researchers in life sciences confront distinct challenges, including extended training duration resulting from the inherently lengthy research cycles associated with their specialized research subjects and experimental materials. Based on national postdoctoral policies and comparison of funding policies between China and the United States, we focus on postdoctoral researchers in life sciences at the School of Life Sciences, Shandong University. Our analysis reveals how current university funding policies constrain the training process of postdoctoral researchers in this field. To address these limitations, we propose a coordinated reform strategy, including reinforcing ideological and political guidance, extending funding durations, establishing cost-sharing mechanisms, and implementing incentives for major achievements. These reforms aim to improve the quality of postdoctoral training and provide policy insights for optimizing the research talent development system in “Double First-Class” universities.

Cite this article

Yan Zhou, Feng Liu . Examining funding policies for postdoctoral researchers in life sciences: a case study of Shandong University[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2025 , 47(10) : 1071 -1077 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.25-178

References

[1] Yang FJ, Liu Y, Liu WL, An J. Comparative study on postdoctoral funding system and output of China and other countries. Beijing: The 10th Annual Academic Conference of China Soft Science Magazine, 2015, 13-22.
  杨芳娟, 刘云刘文澜, 安菁. 中外博士后资助制度及产出的比较研究. 北京:第十届中国软科学学术年会, 2015, 13-22.
[2] 周元敏. 构建博士后科研流动站评价指标体系的认识与实践. 高等理科教育, 2005, (5): 41-44.
[3] 段燕梅. 中美欧博士后制度起源及培养差异对比分析. 华东科技, 2022, (8): 141-144.
[4] 北京大学. 北京大学博士后研究人员管理服务办法. (2022-01-26) [2025-06-28]. https://hr.pku.edu.cn/docs/2021-05/bb0acdd02a3a4462aa8183ceae029db6.pdf.
[5] 复旦大学人事处. 复旦大学博士后服务手册(V4.0版). (2018-01) [2025-06-28]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/2acd9226bdeb19e8b8f67c1cfad6195f312be8ed.html?_wkts_=1752461170376.
[6] The University of Pennsylvania. Policy for postdoctoral trainees at the University of Pennsylvania. (2023-06-20) [2025-06-29]. https://almanac.upenn.edu/articles/of-record-policy-for-postdoctoral-trainees-at-the-university-of-pennsylvania-v69-n37#print.
[7] Postdoctoral Affairs Office of UT Southwestern Medical Center. Handbook for postdoctoral scholars at UT Southwestern. [2025-06-29]. https://www.utsouthwestern.edu/ edumedia/edufiles/graduate_school/postdoctoral_scholars/handbook.pdf.
[8] The Johns Hopkins University. The JHU postdoctoral fellows policy. (2024-03-26) [2025-06-29]. https://policies.jhu.edu/doc/fetch.cfm/ZkSqJAwP.
[9] Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Postdoctoral research fellows policies and forms. (2024-06-30) [2025-06-29]. https://hpo-docs.jh.edu/kh1481J2.
[10] 中共中央组织部, 人力资源部, 教育部, 科学技术部, 工业和信息化部, 财政部, 国务院国资委. 关于加强和改进新时代博士后工作的意见. (2022-12-30) [2025-06-17]. https://www.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/article?inid=34ac658c-9dac-4b68-9983-18dc9ec2414a.
[11] 国务院办公厅. 关于改革完善博士后制度的意见. (2015-11-30) [2025-06-17]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-12/03/content_10380.htm.
[12] 浙江大学人力资源处. 浙江大学全球招聘优秀博士后. (2023-12-11) [2025-06-30]. https://hr.zju.edu.cn/postdoctor/2023/0517/c29115a2758529/page.htm.
[13] Zhou YM. Explorations on appraisal target systems of post-doctoral research center. Modern University Education, 2004, (06): 107-109.
  周元敏. 浅析博士后流动站评价指标体系. 现代大学教育, 2004, (06): 107-109.
Outlines

/