遗传 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9): 869-877.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.26-131
收稿日期:2026-06-01
修回日期:2026-08-01
出版日期:2026-08-20
发布日期:2026-08-20
通讯作者:
程肖蕊,博士,教授,研究方向:衰老与端粒稳态调控。E-mail: Cxr916@163.com作者简介:韩法正,硕士研究生,专业方向:涡虫干细胞与端粒调控。E-mail: 2350121772@qq.com韩法正和王庆仙并列第一作者。
基金资助:
Fazheng Han(
), Qingxian Wang(
), Xiaorui Cheng(
)
Received:2026-06-01
Revised:2026-08-01
Published:2026-08-20
Online:2026-08-20
Supported by:摘要:
涡虫作为扁形动物门(Platyhelminthes)的代表物种,具有极强的再生能力,其体内的成体多能干细胞——neoblasts是其再生的基础。Neoblasts可在机体损伤后快速迁移、增殖、定向分化完成再生。端粒位于真核生物染色体末端,核心功能是维持染色体完整性。随着细胞分裂的次数增多,端粒长度缩短。端粒酶是一种逆转录酶,通过延长端粒重复序列,补偿细胞分裂过程中的端粒损耗。端粒-端粒酶系统是维持干细胞稳态的重要机制之一。涡虫neoblasts作为成体多能干细胞,需维持高频分裂与多向分化的动态平衡,其长期增殖能力与基因组稳定性的维系,可能依赖于端粒-端粒酶系统的精准调控。因此,该系统是解读涡虫非凡再生能力的重要切入点。本文结合近年来涡虫再生、neoblasts调控及端粒-端粒酶系统的相关研究成果,系统综述了端粒-端粒酶参与涡虫neoblasts稳态与再生的研究进展,以期为再生医学、干细胞调控以及神经损伤修复等相关领域的研究提供理论参考。
韩法正, 王庆仙, 程肖蕊. 端粒-端粒酶系统参与涡虫neoblasts稳态与再生研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2026, 48(9): 869-877.
Fazheng Han, Qingxian Wang, Xiaorui Cheng. Progress on the telomere-telomerase system in planarian neoblasts homeostasis and regeneration[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2026, 48(9): 869-877.
图2
涡虫端粒-端粒酶分子结构与作用机制 A:涡虫端粒-端粒酶分子结构示意图。端粒酶利用自身RNA模板,在染色体末端添加TTAGGG端粒重复序列,补偿DNA复制过程中产生的端粒缩短,从而维持端粒长度稳定。图中蓝色框表示端粒酶介导形成的新合成端粒重复序列区域。B:端粒系统参与neoblasts稳态调控的机制模型。端粒酶通过补偿细胞分裂导致的端粒损耗维持端粒长度稳定,进而保障干细胞基因组完整性的核心功能,支撑其增殖、分化及损伤响应功能。实线箭头代表端粒-端粒酶系统维持端粒长度与基因组稳定性已被证实的核心功能;虚线箭头代表目前尚缺乏直接实验证据的潜在关联,包括端粒系统与ROS应激、ERK/MAPK信号、自噬过程以及细胞迁移和分化调控之间的关系。"
表1
涡虫端粒长度与端粒酶活性的检测技术"
| 检测对象 | 核心代表技术 | 检测原理与核心机制 | 在涡虫/干细胞研究中的主要优势与应用 | 文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 端粒酶活性 | qTRAP | 端粒酶延伸TS引物后,结合SYBR Green进行实时荧光定量PCR | 动态定量涡虫切割后24~48 h内端粒酶活性的精准上调倍数 | [ |
| HPA-TRAP | 采用吖啶酯标记探针与端粒酶扩增产物杂交,通过化学发光实现端粒酶活性定量 | 灵敏度高,可检测低至10 个细胞当量样本,理论上可应用于涡虫微量干细胞样本的端粒酶活性定量分析 | [ | |
| 端粒长度 | Q-FISH,Flow-FISH | 肽核酸(peptide nucleic acid,PNA)探针特异性杂交染色体末端基于荧光强度积分定量 | 单细胞级可视化评估,确证neoblasts端粒长度显著长于终末分化细胞 | [ |
| 端粒结构 | PacBio | 结合长读长测序与高通量染色体构象捕获技术,组装得到染色体水平的高质量参考基因组 | 采用长读长测序结合染色体构象捕获技术组装高质量基因组,为涡虫全身再生、neoblasts干性维持等性状提供基因组参考资源,支撑再生相关基因组层面解析 | [ |
| 端粒结构 | 单细胞RNA测序 | 采用单细胞转录组测序解析涡虫各细胞基因表达谱,区分neoblasts干细胞亚群与各类分化细胞,绘制全细胞转录图谱 | 通过单细胞测序获得涡虫几乎全部细胞转录组,鉴定已知、全新细胞类型及干细胞与分化细胞间的过渡态,同时发现肌肉中携带位置信息的区域特异性表达基因 | [ |
| [1] | Kang J, Chen GW. The cellular and molecular mechanism for planarians head regeneration. J Henan Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 48(1): 75-81. |
| 康静, 陈广文. 涡虫头部再生的细胞和分子机制研究. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(1): 75-81. | |
| [2] |
Cui GS, Dong KN, Zhou JY, Li S, Wu Y, Han QH, Yao BF, Shen QL, Zhao YL, Yang Y, Cai J, Zhang SH, Yang YG. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas reveals the dynamic characteristics and key regulators of planarian regeneration. Nat Commun, 2023, 14(1): 3205.
pmid: 37268637 |
| [3] | Baguñá J, Romero R. Quantitative analysis of cell types during growth, degrowth and regeneration in the planarians Dugesia mediterranea and Dugesia tigrina. Hydrobiologia, 1981, 84(1): 181-194. |
| [4] |
Wagner DE, Wang IE, Reddien PW. Clonogenic neoblasts are pluripotent adult stem cells that underlie planarian regeneration. Science, 2011, 332(6031): 811-816.
pmid: 21566185 |
| [5] |
Diaz W, Arenas-Gomez CM. Molecular regulation of telomeric elongation and TERT splicing in planarians. Dev Biol, 2026, 533: 38-48.
pmid: 41679617 |
| [6] |
Tan TCJ, Rahman R, Jaber-Hijazi F, Felix DA, Chen C, Louis EJ, Aboobaker A. Telomere maintenance and telomerase activity are differentially regulated in asexual and sexual worms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109(11): 4209-4214.
pmid: 22371573 |
| [7] | Huang XJ, Zhou T, Zhang QJ, Ran FR, Zhu DY, Li N, Yu Y, Tan JL. Taxonomic review of planarians from China with a key to the families. Sichuan J Zool, 2024, 43(4): 470-480. |
| 黄小娟, 周通, 张祺婧, 冉繁荣, 朱丹阳, 李宁, 余源, 谭江丽. 中国涡虫的分类概况及分科检索表. 四川动物, 2024, 43(4): 470-480. | |
| [8] | Ivanković M, Brand JN, Pandolfini L, Brown T, Pippel M, Rozanski A, Schubert T, Grohme MA, Winkler S, Robledillo L, Zhang M, Codino A, Gustincich S, Vila-Farré M, Zhang S, Papantonis A, Marques A, Rink JC. A comparative analysis of planarian genomes reveals regulatory conservation in the face of rapid structural divergence. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 8215. |
| [9] | Grohme MA, Schloissnig S, Rozanski A, Pippel M, Young GR, Winkler S, Brandl H, Henry I, Dahl A, Powell S, Hiller M, Myers E, Rink JC. The genome of Schmidtea mediterranea and the evolution of core cellular mechanisms. Nature, 2018, 554(7690): 56-61. |
| [10] |
Lee J. Planarians to schistosomes: an overview of flatworm cell-types and regulators. J Helminthol, 2023, 97: e7.
pmid: 36644809 |
| [11] | Orii H, Sakurai T, Watanabe K. Distribution of the stem cells (neoblasts) in the planarian Dugesia japonica. Dev Genes Evol, 2005, 215(3): 143-157. |
| [12] |
Fincher CT, Wurtzel O, de Hoog T, Kravarik KM, Reddien PW. Cell type transcriptome atlas for the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Science, 2018, 360(6391): eaaq1736.
pmid: 29674431 |
| [13] |
Scimone ML, Kravarik KM, Lapan SW, Reddien PW. Neoblast specialization in regeneration of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Stem Cell Reports, 2014, 3(2): 339-352.
pmid: 25254346 |
| [14] |
Zeng A, Li H, Guo LH, Gao X, McKinney S, Wang YF, Yu ZL, Park J, Semerad C, Ross E, Cheng LC, Davies E, Lei K, Wang W, Perera A, Hall K, Peak A, Box A, Sánchez Alvarado A. Prospectively isolated tetraspanin+ neoblasts are adult pluripotent stem cells underlying planaria regeneration. Cell, 2018, 173(7): 1593-1608.e20.
pmid: 29906446 |
| [15] |
Iglesias M, Felix DA, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez Ó, De Miguel-Bonet MDM, Sahu S, Fernández-Varas B, Perona R, Aboobaker AA, Flores I, González-Estévez C. Downregulation of mTOR signaling increases stem cell population telomere length during starvation of immortal planarians. Stem Cell Reports, 2019, 13(2): 405-418.
pmid: 31353226 |
| [16] |
Yin SS, Huang Y, Zhangfang YN, Zhong XQ, Li PQ, Huang JJ, Liu D, Songyang Z. SmedOB1 is required for planarian homeostasis and regeneration. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 34013.
pmid: 27654173 |
| [17] |
Pearson BJ, Sánchez Alvarado A. A planarian p53 homolog regulates proliferation and self-renewal in adult stem cell lineages. Development, 2010, 137(2): 213-221.
pmid: 20040488 |
| [18] |
Tasaki J, Shibata N, Nishimura O, Itomi K, Tabata Y, Son F, Suzuki N, Araki R, Abe M, Agata K, Umesono Y. ERK signaling controls blastema cell differentiation during planarian regeneration. Development, 2011, 138(12): 2417-2427.
pmid: 21610023 |
| [19] |
Sánchez Alvarado A, Newmark PA. Double-stranded RNA specifically disrupts gene expression during planarian regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96(9): 5049-5054.
pmid: 10220416 |
| [20] |
Zheng HX, Li LF, Wang D, Zhang SC, Li WH, Cheng MD, Ge C, Chen JY, Qiang YM, Chen FL, Yu Y. FoxO is required for neoblast differentiation during planarian regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol, 2025, 288: 138729.
pmid: 39672403 |
| [21] |
Lei K, Thi-Kim Vu H, Mohan RD, McKinney SA, Seidel CW, Alexander R, Gotting K, Workman JL, Alvarado AS. Egf signaling directs neoblast repopulation by regulating asymmetric cell division in planarians. Dev Cell, 2016, 38(4): 413-429.
pmid: 27523733 |
| [22] |
Shiobara Y, Harada C, Shiota T, Sakamoto K, Kita K, Tanaka S, Tabata K, Sekie K, Yamamoto Y, Sugiyama T. Knockdown of the coenzyme Q synthesis gene Smed-dlp 1 affects planarian regeneration and tissue homeostasis. Redox Biol, 2015, 6: 599-606.
pmid: 26516985 |
| [23] |
Reddien PW. The cellular and molecular basis for planarian regeneration. Cell, 2018, 175(2): 327-345.
pmid: 30290140 |
| [24] |
Maida Y, Kyo S, Kanaya T, Wang Z, Yatabe N, Tanaka M, Nakamura M, Ohmichi M, Gotoh N, Murakami S, Inoue M. Direct activation of telomerase by EGF through Ets-mediated transactivation of TERT via MAP kinase signaling pathway. Oncogene, 2002, 21(26): 4071-4079.
pmid: 12037663 |
| [25] | Ma KX, Li R, Guo FY, Song GG, Wu M, Chen GW, Liu DZ. Functional analysis of autophagy-related gene Atg6 in planarian central nervous system regeneration. Hereditas(Beijing), 2021, 43(8): 792-801. |
| 马克学, 李睿, 郭芳莹, 宋鸽鸽, 吴萌, 陈广文, 刘德增. 细胞自噬基因Atg6在涡虫中枢神经系统再生中的功能研究. 遗传, 2021, 43(8): 792-801. | |
| [26] |
Zhu SJ, Hallows SE, Currie KW, Xu CJ, Pearson BJ. A mex3 homolog is required for differentiation during planarian stem cell lineage development. eLife, 2015, 4: e07025.
pmid: 26114597 |
| [27] |
Dai XT, Li XH, Tyshkovskiy A, Zuckerman C, Cheng N, Lin P, Paris D, Qureshi S, Kruglyak L, Mao XM, Nandakumar J, Gladyshev VN, Pletcher S, Sobota J, Guo LH. Regeneration leads to global tissue rejuvenation in aging sexual planarians. Nat Aging, 2025, 5(5): 780-798.
pmid: 40181188 |
| [28] |
Lai AG, Pouchkina-Stantcheva N, Di Donfrancesco A, Kildisiute G, Sahu S, Aboobaker AA. The protein subunit of telomerase displays patterns of dynamic evolution and conservation across different metazoan taxa. BMC Evol Biol, 2017, 17(1): 107.
pmid: 28441946 |
| [29] |
Hirose M, Abe-Hashimoto J, Ogura K, Tahara H, Ide T, Yoshimura T. A rapid, useful and quantitative method to measure telomerase activity by hybridization protection assay connected with a telomeric repeat amplification protocol. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 1997, 123(6): 337-344.
pmid: 9222300 |
| [30] |
O’Sullivan RJ, Karlseder J. Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2010, 11(3): 171-181.
pmid: 20125188 |
| [31] |
de Lange T. Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev, 2005, 19(18): 2100-2110.
pmid: 16166375 |
| [1] | 谢盈盈, 王克剑, 饶玉春, 黄勇. 发育调节因子助力作物遗传转化效率提升[J]. 遗传, 2025, 47(9): 992-1006. |
| [2] | 陈昊, 董瑞, 王岩峰, 谢净倍, 张招旭, 郑荣泉. 义乌小鲵肢体再生及其分子机制[J]. 遗传, 2025, 47(9): 1032-1041. |
| [3] | 周泰增, 陈秋阳, 杨祎挺, 甘麦邻, 朱砺, 沈林園. MicroRNA对肌肉再生功能调控研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2025, 47(5): 513-532. |
| [4] | 刘吉祥, 赖思婷, 白晶, 徐进. Il34拯救甲硝唑导致的斑马鱼中枢神经系统轴突再生障碍[J]. 遗传, 2024, 46(6): 478-489. |
| [5] | 王承贤, 容益康, 崔敏. 果蝇限制端粒转座子的分子机制[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(3): 221-228. |
| [6] | 赵欢, 周斌. 胰岛beta细胞再生研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(5): 370-382. |
| [7] | 马克学, 李睿, 郭芳莹, 宋鸽鸽, 吴萌, 陈广文, 刘德增. 细胞自噬基因Atg6在涡虫中枢神经系统再生中的功能研究[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(8): 792-801. |
| [8] | 曹岚, 李志强, 师咏勇, 刘赟. 端粒长度与2型糖尿病:孟德尔随机化研究与多基因风险评分分析[J]. 遗传, 2020, 42(9): 882-888. |
| [9] | 杨志, 姚俊, 曹新. FGF信号通路在内耳发育调控和毛细胞再生中的作用[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(7): 515-524. |
| [10] | 王永煜,余薇,周斌. Hippo信号通路与心血管发育及疾病调控[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(7): 576-587. |
| [11] | 顾远, 张雷, 余发星. Hippo信号通路在肠道稳态、再生及癌变过程中的作用及机制[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(7): 588-596. |
| [12] | 付思玲,赵婉滢,张雯婧,宋海,季红斌,汤楠. Hippo信号通路在肺发育、再生和疾病中的功能[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(7): 597-606. |
| [13] | 李玉席, 李俊宏, 周大旺. Hippo信号通路与肝脏稳态调控及疾病发生[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(7): 607-616. |
| [14] | 张晓玲,龙芸,葛飞,管中荣,张晓祥,王艳丽,沈亚欧,潘光堂. 玉米幼胚胚性愈伤组织再生能力相关性状遗传研究[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(2): 143-155. |
| [15] | 范晴晴, 孟飞龙, 房冉, 李高鹏, 赵小立. Wnt信号通路在毛细胞分化和再生过程中的作用[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(10): 897-907. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
www.chinagene.cn
备案号:京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线: