研究报告

构巢曲霉与30种丝状子囊菌的基因组比较

展开
  • 1. 长江大学生命科学学院, 荆州 434025; 2. Guelph大学环境生物学系, 加拿大

收稿日期: 2010-01-06

  修回日期: 2010-03-05

  网络出版日期: 2010-11-25

基金资助

湖北省自然科学基金项目(编号:2009CDB362)和湖北省国际交流合作项目(编号:2009BFA014)资助

Comparison of genomes between Aspergillus nidulans and 30 filamentous ascomycetes

Expand
  • 1. College of Life Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China; 2. Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph N1G 2W1, Canada

Received date: 2010-01-06

  Revised date: 2010-03-05

  Online published: 2010-11-25

摘要

为探讨丝状子囊菌的序列同源性, 文章利用公开发表的真菌基因组序列构建本地基因组数据库, 设置E 值统计阈值为0.1, 将构巢曲霉(Aspergillus nidulans)基因组的10 560个注释基因分别与30种丝状子囊菌基因组比较。结果表明, 同源匹配基因数量的多少可反映子囊菌之间的进化关系。构巢曲霉基因组的924个基因与这 30种子囊菌基因组同时存在匹配序列, 其中E值在10-5~0.1、10-30 ~10-5、10-100 ~10-30、0~10-100范围内都存在匹配序列的基因分别为6个、3个、6个和6个。ClustalX多序列比对分析显示, E值10-5~0.1的6组序列和E值10-30~10-5的3组序列均显示变异性过大而E值0~10-100的6组序列过于保守, E值介于10-100 ~10-30之间的6组同源序列可用于本研究的31种子囊菌系统学分析。

本文引用格式

曾昭清,赵福永,Tom Hsiang,余知和 . 构巢曲霉与30种丝状子囊菌的基因组比较[J]. 遗传, 2010 , 32(11) : 1195 -1202 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2010.01195

Abstract

To investigate the conserved homologs of filamentous ascomycetes genomes, the local fungal genome database used in this analysis was established, which consisted of 31 latest and complete genome data publicly available on the Internet. An expectation value cutoff of 0.1 was used to identify significant hits. Each complete gene set of the query genome Aspergillus nidulans genome with 10 560 annotated genes was splitted into individual FASTA files with Seqverter and then compared separately against each filamentous ascomycete genome using Standalone BLASTN. The result indicated that the number of matches reflected the evolutional relationships of the filamentous ascomycetes analysed. Of 10 560 genes in Aspergillus nidulans genome, 924 had match sequences with other 30 filamentous ascomycetes ones. The number of homology sequences were 6, 3, 6, and 6 at E-values in the range of 10-5 to 0.1, 10-30 to 10-5, 10-100 to 10-5 and 0 to 10-100, respecively. Six homologs at E-values ranging from 10-5 to 0.1 and 3 at E-values ranging from 10-30 to 10-5 were variable, while the 6 at E-values ranging from 0 to 10-100 were highly conserved based on the alignments using ClustalX. Six homologs were relatively conserved at E-values in the range of 10-100 to 10-30, which can be used in phylogeny of these filamentous ascomycetes in this study.

参考文献

[1] Hardison RC. Comparative genomics. PLoS Biol, 2003, 1(2): e58. [2] Koonin EV, Aravind L, Kondrashov AS. The impact of comparative genomics on our understanding of evolution. Cell, 2000, 101(6): 573–576. [3] Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008, 36(Database issue): D475–D479. [4] 王征, 戴玉成. 真菌生命之树项目(Assembling the Fun-gal Tree of Life)和美国真菌系统学研究现状. 菌物学报, 2009, 28(6): 878–887. [5] Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME, Stajich JE, Butler G. A fungal phy-logeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol, 2006, 6: 99. [6] Hsiang T, Baillie DL. Comparison of the yeast proteome to other fungal genomes to find core fungal genes. J Mol Evol, 2005, 60(4): 475–483. [7] Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Cuomo C, Ma LJ, Wortman JR, Batzoglou S, Lee SI, Ba?türkmen M, Spevak CC, Clut-terbuck J, Kapitonov V, Jurka J, Scazzocchio C, Farman M, Butler J, Purcell S, Harris S, Braus GH, Draht O, Busch S, D’Enfert C, Bouchier C, Goldman GH, Bell-Pedersen D, Griffiths-Jones S, Doonan JH, Yu J, Vienken K, Pain A, Freitag M, Selker EU, Archer DB, Penñalva MÁ, Oakley BR, Momany M, Tanaka T, Kumagai T, Asai K, Machida M, Nierman WC, Denning DW, Caddick M, Hynes M, Paoletti M, Fischer R, Miller B, Dyer P, Sachs MS, Os-mani SA, Birren BW. Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae. Nature, 2005, 438(7071): 1105–1115. [8] Cornell MJ, Alam I, Soanes DM, Wong HM, Hedeler C, Paton NW, Rattray M, Hubbard SJ, Talbot NJ, Oliver SG. Comparative genome analysis across a kingdom of eu-karyotic organisms: Specialization and diversification in the Fungi. Genome Res, 2007, 17(12): 1809–1822. [9] Xu JR, Peng YL, Dickman MB, Sharon A. The dawn of fungal pathogen genomics. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2006, 44: 337–366. [10] Soanes DM, Alam I, Cornell M, Wong HM, Hedeler C, Paton NW, Rattray M, Hubbard SJ, Oliver SG, Talbot NJ. Comparative genome analysis of filamentous fungi reveals gene family expansions associated with fungal pathogene-sis. PLoS One, 2008, 3(6): e2300. [11] Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol, 1990, 215(3): 403–410. [12] Osmani SA, Mirabito PM. The early impact of genetics on our understanding of cell cycle regulation in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet Biol, 2004, 41(4): 401–410. [13] Nierman WC, May G, Kim HS, Anderson MJ, Chen D, Denning DW. What the Aspergillus genomes have told us. Med Mycol, 2005, 43(Suppl. 1): S3–S5. [14] Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Hig-gins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res, 1997, 25(24): 4876–4882. [15] Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Mo-lecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) soft-ware version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol, 2007, 24(8): 1596–1599. [16] Claverie JM, Notredame C. Bioinformatics for Dummies. 2nd Ed..Wiley Publishing, Hoboken, 2007, 212–236. [17] Daugaard M, Rohde M, Jäättelä M. The heat shock protein 70 family: Highly homologous proteins with overlapping and distinct functions. FEBS Lett, 2007, 581(19): 3702–3710. [18] Pevsner J. 孙之荣主译. 生物信息学与功能基因组学. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006, 94–96. [19] Forrest ARR, Taylor D, RIKEN GER Group, GSL Mem-bers, Grimmond S. Exploration of the cell-cycle genes found within the RIKEN FANTOM2 data set. Genome Res, 2003, 13(6B): 1366–1375. [20] Shultz JL, Ray JD, Lightfoot DA. A sequence based synteny map between soybean and Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics, 2
文章导航

/