综述

哺乳动物中的DNA主动去甲基化

展开
  • 华中农业大学动物科技学院, 农业动物遗传育种与繁殖教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430070

收稿日期: 2010-08-28

  修回日期: 2010-10-21

  网络出版日期: 2011-04-25

基金资助

国家现代农业技术体系项目(编号:nycytx-10)和国家自然科学基金项目(编号:31001007)资助

Active DNA demethylation in mammals

Expand
  • Key Lab of Education Ministry of China in Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received date: 2010-08-28

  Revised date: 2010-10-21

  Online published: 2011-04-25

摘要

DNA甲基化是一种相对稳定且可遗传的表观遗传标记, 在植物和动物细胞中均发现有DNA主动去甲基化现象, 其机制在植物中已基本得到阐释, 但在哺乳动物中尚未鉴定出一种有效的DNA去甲基化酶, 并且DNA主动去甲基化途径也存在争议。文章综合分析了近期的文献资料, 阐述了哺乳动物中发生DNA主动去甲基化的时空特异性, 并从细胞和组织特异性角度介绍DNA主动去甲基化的可能通路和机制, 即5-甲基胞嘧啶的氧化作用、5-甲基胞嘧啶脱氨基以及DNA修复等, 旨在为破译表观遗传重编程过程提供理论依据。

本文引用格式

肖遥,张华林,白莉雅,王晓民,李文功,杨利国 . 哺乳动物中的DNA主动去甲基化[J]. 遗传, 2011 , 33(4) : 298 -306 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2011.00298

Abstract

DNA methylation is a stable and heritable epigenetic mark, and it is one of the best characterized epigenetic modifications. Active DNA demethylation has been reported both in plant and animal cells, and the mechanism behind it is becoming clear in plant. Whereas a bona fide enzyme, which is responsible for active DNA demethylation, have not been identified in mammals, and active demethylation pathway is controversial. In the present review, we described that active DNA demethylation take place in a spatial- and temporal-specific way on the basis of recent literatures. Moreover, several candidate pathways such as oxygenation and deamination of 5-methyl cytosine and DNA repair pathways, which may be responsible for the active process were introduced on a cell- and tissue-specific view. The aim of this paper is to help re-searchers reveal the mechanism underlying this important event during epigenetic reprogramming in mammals.

参考文献

[1] Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, Hawkins RD, Hon G, Tonti-Filippini J, Nery JR, Lee L, Ye Z, Ngo QM, Edsall L, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Stewart R, Ruotti V, Millar AH, Thomson JA, Ren B, Ecker JR. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature, 2009, 462(7271): 315-322.
[2] Bird AP, Wolffe AP. Methylation-induced repression-belts, braces, and chromatin. Cell, 1999, 99(5): 451-454.
[3] Jones PA, Takai D. The role of DNA methylation in mammalian epigenetics. Science, 2001, 293(5532): 1068-1070.
[4] Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10(5): 295-304.
[5] Koerner MV, Pauler FM, Huang R, Barlow DP. The function of non-coding RNAs in genomic imprinting. Development, 2009, 136(11): 1771-1783.
[6] Park KY, Pfeifer K. Epigenetic interplay. Nat Genet, 2003, 34(2): 126-128.
[7] Maunakea AK, Nagarajan RP, Bilenky M, Ballinger TJ, D'Souza C, Fouse SD, Johnson BE, Hong CB, Nielsen C, Zhao YJ, Turecki G, Delaney A, Varhol R, Thiessen N, Shchors K, Heine VM, Rowitch DH, Xing XY, Fiore C, Schillebeeckx M, Jones SJM, Haussler D, Marra MA, Hirst M, Wang T, Costello JF. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature, 2010, 466(7303): 253-257.
[8] Jones PA, Liang GN. Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10(11): 805-811.
[9] Law JA, Jacobsen SE. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11(3): 204-220.
[10] Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science, 2001, 293(5532): 1089-1093.
[11] Reik W, Walter J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat Rev Genet, 2001, 2(1): 21-32.
[12] Sasaki H, Matsui Y. Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nat Rev Genet, 2008, 9(2): 129-140.
[13] Ooi SKT, Bestor TH. The colorful history of active DNA demethylation. Cell, 2008, 133(7): 1145-1148.
[14] Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet, 2002, 3(9): 662-673.
[15] Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature, 2007, 447(7143): 425-432.
[16] Morgan HD, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Mol Genet, 2005, 14(Spec 1): R47-R58.
[17] Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, Fundele R, Haaf T. Embryogenesis: Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature, 2000, 403(6769): 501-502.
[18] Oswald J, Engemann S, Lane N, Mayer W, Olek A, Fundele R, Dean W, Reik W, Walter J. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr Biol, 2000, 10(8): 475-478.
[19] Hajkova P, Erhardt S, Lane N, Haaf T, El-Maarri O, Reik W, Walter J, Surani MA. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Dev, 2002, 117(1-2): 15-23.
[20] Lee JY, Inoue K, Ono R, Ogonuki N, Kohda T, Kaneko-Ishino T, Ogura A, Ishino F. Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. Development, 2002, 129(8): 1807-1817.
[21] Zhu JK. Active DNA demethylation mediated by DNA glycosylases. Annu Rev Genet, 2009, 43: 143-166.
[22] Monk M, Boubelik M, Lehnert S. Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development. Development, 1987, 99(3): 371-382.
[23] Howlett SK, Reik W. Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development, 1991, 113(1): 119-127.
[24] Farthing CR, Ficz G, Ng RK, Chan CF, Andrews S, Dean W, Hemberge
文章导航

/