传统观念认为细菌是一种个体的、非社会性的生物体。近年来的研究表明细菌可以产生化学信号并通过它们实现细菌间信息传递。细菌的群体感应调节系统(Quorum sensing, QS)调节着个体细胞之间的相互合作, 使其表现出类似多细胞的群体行为。文章以近年来的一些最新研究进展为基础, 在了解细菌间的信息传递系统的基础上, 从进化角度讨论了QS系统的遗传产生过程, 探讨了细菌细胞间的相互作用。细菌间的信息交流是一种动态的过程, 受到了环境中的营养物质的水平、温度、pH等多种因素的影响。作者推测细菌信号传递系统的进化是受到环境条件以及基因交换、所在微生物群体变化等因素影响下的一种不断变化的动态过程, 这也许有别于动植物这类的高等生物的进化过程。这种动态的变化过程也就暗示：从长远来看,信息传递系统中的偷机者只是在一定条件下的暂时存在。
In contrast to the individual and nonsocial organism view of bacteria, recent discoveries show that bacteria can communicate and exhibit population behaviour via a system known as quorum sensing. Some bacterial behavious can only be initiated when the cell number reaches a certain level (Quorum sensing, QS). It is generally believed that quorum sensing is used to coordinate cooperative behaviours at the population level; however, many issues exist regarding the evolution or development of such a system. In the present paper, the evolutionary process of bacterial quorum-sensing systems is discussed based on recent events and progresses in this field. As quorum sensing systems are often affected by environ-mental factors, such as temperature, pH, and nutrient levels, it is hence proposed that the evolution of bacterial cooperation, such as the quorum sensing, is rather a dynamic and ever-changing process which is radically affected by environmental conditions, genetic exchanges, as well as by changes in microbial community. The dynamic transformation suggests the advantages of cheaters of the system might have been short-lasted and confined in certain conditions and diminish over a long run.
[1] Duan K, Dammel C, Stein J, Rabin H, Surette MG. Modu-lation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene expression by host microflora through interspecies communication. Mol Microbiol, 2003, 50(5): 1477-1491.
[2] Platt TG, Fuqua C. What's in a name? The semantics of quorum sensing. Trends Microbiol, 2010, 18(9): 383-387.
[3] Strassmann JE, Queller DC. Colloquium Paper: Evolution of cooperation and control of cheating in a social microbe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108(Suppl. 2): 10855-10862.
[4] Waters CM, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2005, 21(1): 319-346.
[5] Pennisi E. On the origin of cooperation. Science, 2009, 325(5945): 1196-1199.
[6] Köhler T, Buckling A, van Delden C. Cooperation and virulence of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(15): 6339-6344.
[7] Czárán T, Hoekstra RF. Microbial communication, coop-eration and cheating: quorum sensing drives the evolution of cooperation in bacteria. PLoS One, 2009, 4(8): e6655.
[8] Dunny GM, Brickman TJ, Dworkin M. Multicellular behavior in bacteria: communication, cooperation, competition and cheating. Bioessays, 2008, 30(4): 296-298.
[9] Goldenfeld N, Woese C. Biology's next revolution. Nature, 2007, 445(7126): 369-369.
[10] Winzer K, Hardie KR, Williams P. Bacterial cell-to-cell communication: sorry, can't talk now-gone to lunch! Curr Opin Microbiol, 2002, 5(2): 216-222.
[11] Bassler BL, Losick R. Bacterially speaking. Cell, 2006, 125(2): 237-246.
[12] Taga ME, Bassler BL. Chemical communication among bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100(Suppl. 2): 14549-14554.
[13] 吴红, 宋志军, Høiby N, Givskoy M. 细菌与细菌之间的信息交流-革兰氏阴性细菌的Quorum-Sensing系统. 自然科学进展, 2003, 13(7): 679-687.
[14] Reguera G. When microbial conversations get physical. Trends Microbiol, 2011, 19(3): 105-113.
[15] Keller L, Surette MG. Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2006, 4(4): 249-258.
[16] Diggle SP, Gardner A, West SA, Griffin AS. Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2007, 362(1483): 1241-1249.
[17] Miller MB, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2001, 55(1): 165-199.
[18] Maynard-Smith J, Harper D: Animal Signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[19] Egland PG, Palmer RJ Jr, Kolenbrander PE. Interspecies communication in Streptococcus gordonii-Veillonella atypica biofilms: signaling in flow conditions requires juxtaposetion. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2004, 101(48): 16917-16922.
[20] Frank SA. All of life is social. Curr Biol, 2007, 17(16): R648-R650.
[21] Griffin AS, West SA, Buckling A. Cooperation and com-petition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature, 2004, 430(7003): 1024-1027.
[22] Dugatkin LA, Perlin M, Lucas JS, Atlas R. Group-beneficial traits, frequency-dependent selection and genotypic diversity: an antibiotic resistance paradigm. Proc Biol Sci, 2005, 272(1558): 79-83.
[23] Hooi DSW, Bycroft BW, Chhabra SR, Williams P, Pritchard DI. Differential immune modulatory activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing signal molecules. Infect Immun, 2004, 72(11): 6463-6470.
[24] Daniels R, Vanderleyden J, Michiels J. Quorum sensing and swarming migration in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2004, 28(3): 261-289.
[25] Redfield RJ. Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? Trends Microbiol, 2002, 10(8): 365-370.
[26] Hense BA, Kuttler C, Müller J, Rothballer M, Hartmann A, Kreft JU. Does efficiency sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? Nat Rev Microbiol, 2007, 5(3): 230-239.<
