作为生物进化的两个主流理论, 中性学说和现代达尔文进化理论相对系统地揭示了进化机理和历程, 但也都有缺陷, 比如对某些重大进化现象如遗传等距离和重叠位点(Overlap sites)的忽视, 对复杂性的视而不见, 对遗传多样性的片面解读, 以及与化石证据相悖等。遗传多样性上限假说(Maximum genetic diversity hypothesis, MGD)通过对遗传等距离现象的重新解读, 给出了复杂性的量化定义和可操作研究手段, 提出了重叠特征和遗传多样性具有上限等结论。它对人猿分类关系和现代人多地区起源的分子解读结论, 与独立的化石证据契合度较高, 重新肯定了中国在人类发展中的关键作用, 点出了流行分子结论的荒谬在于误用了极限距离。该理论同时对复杂性状和复杂疾病的遗传机制研究具有指导意义。文章对多种酵母、鱼类、灵长类的细胞色素c进行序列比对, 独立验证了MGD假说的部分论断, 并解释了重叠位点在遗传距离计算上的重要意义。MGD假说中的上限或最佳平衡概念, 与传统国学和中医阴阳中庸思想对宇宙基本规律的描述是一脉相承的。
As two major popular theories to explain evolutionary facts, the neutral theory and Neo-Darwinism, despite their proven virtues in certain areas, still fail to offer comprehensive explanations to such fundamental evolutionary phenomena as the genetic equidistance result, abundant overlap sites, increase in complexity over time, incomplete understanding of genetic diversity, and inconsistencies with fossil and archaeological records. Maximum genetic diversity hypothesis (MGD), however, constructs a more complete evolutionary genetics theory that incorporates all of the proven virtues of existing theories and adds to them the novel concept of a maximum or optimum limit on genetic distance or diversity. It has yet to meet a contradiction and explained for the first time the half-century old Genetic Equidistance phenomenon as well as most other major evolutionary facts. It provides practical and quantitative ways of studying complexity. Molecular interpretation using MGD-based methods reveal novel insights on the origins of humans and other primates that are consistent with fossil evidence and common sense, and reestablished the important role of China in the evolution of humans. MGD theory has also uncovered an important genetic mechanism in the construction of complex traits and the pathogenesis of complex diseases. We here made a series of sequence comparisons among yeasts, fishes and primates to illustrate the concept of limit on genetic distance. The idea of limit or optimum is in line with the yin-yang paradigm in the traditional Chinese view of the universal creative law in nature.
[1] Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature, 1968, 217(5129): 624-626.
[2] King JL, Jukes TH. Non-Darwinian evolution. Science, 1969, 164(3881): 788-798.
[3] Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. Molecular disease, evolution, and genetic heterogeneity. In: Kasha M, Pullman B, eds. Horizons in Biochemistry. New York: Academic Press, 1962: 189-225.
[4] Margoliash E. Primary structure and evolution of cytochrome c. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1963, 50(4): 672-679.
[5] Kumar S. Molecular clocks: four decades of evolution. Nat Rev Genet, 2005, 6(8): 654-662.
[6] Kimura M, Ohta T. On the rate of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol, 1971, 1(1): 1-17.
[7] Ayala FJ. Molecular clock mirages. BioEssays, 1999, 21(1): 71-75.
[8] Pulquério MJ, Nichols RA. Dates from the molecular clock: how wrong can we be? Trends Ecol Evol, 2007, 22(4): 180-184.
[9] Huang S. The genetic equidistance result of molecular evolution is independent of mutation rates. J Comp Sci Syst Biol, 2008, 1(12): 92-102.
[10] Huang S. Inverse relationship between genetic diversity and epigenetic complexity. Preprint available at Nature Precedings, 2009, doi: 10.1038/npre.2009.1751.2.
[11] Huang S. Primate phylogeny: molecular evidence for a pongid clade excluding humans and a prosimian clade containing tarsiers. Sci China Life Sci, 2012, 55(8): 709-725.
[12] Laird CD, McConaughy BL, McCarthy BJ. Rate of fixation of nucleotide substitutions in evolution. Nature, 1969, 224(5215): 149-154.
[13] Jukes TH, Holmquist R. Evolutionary clock: nonconstancy of rate in different species. Science, 1972, 177(4048): 530-532.
[14] Goodman M, Moore GW, Bamabas J, Matsuda G. The phylogeny of human globin genes investigated by the maximum parsimony method. J Mol Evol, 1974, 3(1): 1-48.
[15] Langley CH, Fitch WM. An examination of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol, 1974, 3(3): 161-177.
[16] Li WH. Molecular evolution. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. 1997.
[17] Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[18] Avise JC. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. New York: Springer, 1994.
[19] Gago S, Elena SF, Flores R, Sanjuán R. Extremely high mutation rate of a hammerhead viroid. Science, 2009, 323(5919): 1308.
[20] Huang S. Molecular evidence for the hadrosaur B. canadensis as an outgroup to a clade containing the dinosaur T. rex and birds. Riv Biol, 2009, 102(1): 20-22.
[21] Huang S. Ancient fossil specimens of extinct species are genetically more distant to an outgroup than extant sister species are. Riv Biol, 2008, 101(1): 93-108.
[22] Yuan DJ, Zhu ZB, Tan XH, Liang J, Zeng C, Zhang JG, Chen J, Ma L, Dogan A, Brockmann G, Goldmann O, Medina E, Rice AD, Moyer RW, Man X, Yi K, Li YK, Lu Q, Huang YM, Wang DP, Yu J, Guo H, Xia K, Huang S. Minor alleles of common SNPs quantitatively affect traits/diseases and are under both positive and negative selection. arXiv: 1209.2911(abstract # 2251). In: Presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics. San Francisco, California, 2012.
[23] Bromham L, Penny D. The modern molecular clock. Nat Rev Genet, 2003, 4(3): 216-224.
[24] Leffler EM, Bullaughey K, Matute DR, Meyer WK, Ségurel L, Venkat A, Andofatto P, Przeworski M. Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species? PLoS Biol, 2012, 10(9): e1001388.
[25] Gould SJ, Eldredge N. Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature, 1993, 366(6452): 223-227.
[26] Goldschmidt R. The material basis of evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1940.
[27] Lovtrup S. Darwinism: the refutation of a myth. New York: Springer, 1987.
[28] Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Evolution in four d
