文章以马铃薯Y病毒(Potato virus Y, PVY) P3和pipo基因为分子标记,比较分析烟草和马铃薯两个寄主的PVY遗传多样性和群体分化,并评估突变、选择、基因流等遗传力所起的作用。通过P3和pipo基因计算获得的烟草和马铃薯群体分化指数FST分别为0.116和0.120,且统计检验差异显著,表明烟草和马铃薯寄主的PVY之间中度分化。变异分析结果显示,烟草分离物P3和pipo基因的核苷酸序列一致性分别为85.2%~100%和76.5%~100%,而马铃薯分离物的P3和pipo基因的核苷酸序列一致性分别为95.7%~100%和93.0%~100%,表明烟草PVY变异程度高于马铃薯。同时,P3基因内检测到大量的净化选择位点,表明该基因大部分位点的变异为有害突变,在进化过程中被剔除。此外,P3基因内还检测到两个显著正向选择位点,表明这两个位点的变异为有益突变,有利于病毒的生存竞争。在pipo基因中未检测到显著的选择位点,表明该基因上的变异基本不受自然选择影响。通过P3和pipo基因计算烟草和马铃薯群体间的基因流Nm值分别为1.91和1.83,表明这两个群体间存在较强的基因交流。以上结果表明,来源于烟草和马铃薯寄主的PVY遗传差异显著,突变、自然选择以及基因流都影响两者的遗传多样性及遗传分化程度。
Nucleotide sequences of P3 and pipo genes of Potato virus Y (PVY) from potato and tobacco were compared to investigate the effect of hosts on the population genetic structure. Meanwhile, mutation, natural selection and gene flow were evaluated to determine evolutionary forces responsible for the population genetic dynamics. The fixation indices of population differentiation (FST) of PVY from tobacco and potato were 0.116 and 0.120, respectively with significant difference, suggesting a moderate genetic differentiation between the two populations. Genetic variation analysis showed that nucleotide identities in P3 and pipo genes among the viral isolates from tobacco were respectively in the range of 85.2%-100% and 76.5%-100% while that from potato were respectively in the range of 95.7%-100% and 93.0%-100%, indicating higher genetic variation in PVY from tobacco than that from potato. Moreover, purifying selection was detected on the majority of polymorphic sites within P3 gene, suggesting that most of mutations in the gene were harmful and consequently being eliminated by natural selection. Conversely, positive selection was detected on two polymorphic sites, suggesting that these two mutations were beneficial to PVY. Neither purifying nor positive selection was detected in pipo gene, indicating neutral evolution of the gene. The values of gene flow (Nm) between PVY populations from tobacco and potato in P3 and pipo genes were 1.91 and 1.83, respectively, suggesting strong gene flow also contributes significantly to the population genetic dynamics of PVY population. In summary, this study indicates there was a significant genetic variation in PVY hosted by tobacco and potato, and mutation, natural selection and gene flow all contribute to the genetic diversity and population dynamic of the virus.
[1] 祝雯, 詹家绥. 植物病原物的群体遗传学. 遗传, 2012, 34(2): 157-166.
[2] Ohshima K, Sako K, Hiraishi C, Nakagawa A, Matsuo K, Ogawa T, Shikata E, Sako N. Potato tuber necrotic ringspot disease occurring in Japan: its association with Potato virus Y necrotic strain. Plant Dis , 2000, 84(10): 1109-1115.
[3] 孙琦, 张春庆. PVY N 与PVY O 病毒RT-PCR快速检测体系研究. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(1): 213-216.
[4] Lorenzen J, Nolte P, Martin D, Pasche JS, Gudmestad NC. NE-11 represents a new strain variant class of Potato virus Y . Arch Virol , 2008, 153(3): 517-525.
[5] Ogawa T, Tomitaka Y, Nakagawa A, Ohshima K. Genetic structure of a population of Potato virus Y inducing potato tuber necrotic ringspot disease in Japan; comparison with North American and European populations. Virus Res , 2008, 131(2): 199-212.
[6] Hu XX, Nie XZ, He CZ, Xiong XY. Differential pathogenicity of two different recombinant PVY NTN isolates in Physalis floridana is likely determined by the coat protein gene. J Virol , 2011, 8: 207.
[7] Ogawa T, Nakagawa A, Hataya T, Ohshima K. The genetic structure of populations of Potato virus Y in Japan; based on the analysis of 20 full genomic sequences. J Phytopathol , 2012, 160(11-12): 661-673.
[8] 高芳銮, 沈建国, 史凤阳, 方治国, 谢联辉, 詹家绥. 中国马铃薯Y病毒的检测鉴定及 CP 基因的分子变异. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(15): 3125-3133.
[9] Glais L, Tribodet M, Kerlan C. Genomic variability in Potato potyvirus Y (PVY): evidence that PVY N W and PVY NTN variants are single to multiple recombinants between PVY O and PVY N isolates. Arch Virol , 2002, 147(2): 363-378.
[10] Nolte P, Whitworth J L, Thornton M K, McIntosh C S. Effect of seedborne Potato virus Y on performance of Russet Burbank, Russet Norkotah, and Shepody potato. Plant Dis , 2004, 88(3): 248-252.
[11] Whitworth J L, Nolte P, McIntosh C, Davidson R. Effect of Potato virus Y on yield of three potato cultivars grown under different nitrogen levels. Plant Dis , 2006, 90(1): 73-76.
[12] 罗红香, 李余湘, 刘会忠, 徐明勇, 王林玉, 赵中汇, 何玉安, 李章海, 江彤. 贵州黔南烟草马铃薯Y病毒(PVY)株系的血清学鉴定. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(5): 60-62.
[13] 余春英, 张西仲, 王定福, 李余湘, 罗红香, 蒙祥旭, 曾宪佛. 黔南烟区烟草马铃薯Y病毒病发病原因及防治措施. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(10): 5110-5112.
[14] Quenouille J, Vassilakos N, Moury B. Potato virus Y : a major crop pathogen that has provided major insights into the evolution of viral pathogenicity. Mol Plant Pathol , 2013, 14(5): 439-452.
[15] Gao F, Chang F, Shen J, Shi F, Xie L, Zhan J. Complete genome analysis of a novel recombinant isolate of Potato virus Y from China. Arch Virol , 2014, 159(12): 3439-3442.
[16] Rahman MS, Akanda AK. Performance of seed potato produced from sprout cutting, stem cutting and conventional tuber against PVY and PLRV. Bangladesh J Agril Res , 2009, 34(4): 609-622.
[17] King AM, Lefkowitz E, Adams MJ, Carstens EB. Virus taxonomy, ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press, 2012.
[18] 高芳銮, 沈建国, 史凤阳, 常飞, 谢联辉, 詹家绥. 马铃薯Y病毒 pipo 基因的分子变异及结构特征分析. 遗传, 2013, 35(9): 1125-1134.
[19] Chung BYW, Miller WA, Atkins JF, Firth AE. An overlapping essential gene in the Potyviridae . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2008, 105(15): 5897-5902.
[20] Scholthof KB, Adkins S, Czosnek H, Palukaitis P, Jacquot E, Hohn T, Hohn B, Saunders K, Candresse T, Ahlquist P, Hemenway C, Foster GD. Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol , 2011, 12(9): 938-954.
[21] 李娜. 马铃薯Y病毒CP基因的分子变异[学位论文]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2005.
[22] 史凤阳, 高芳銮, 沈建国, 常飞, 詹家绥. 马铃薯Y病毒福建分离物 P1 基因的分子变异和结构特征. 遗传, 2014, 36(7): 713-722.
[23] Tian YP, Liu JL, Zhang CL, Liu YY, Wang B, Li XD, Guo ZK, Valkonen JPT. Genetic diversity of Potato virus Y infecting tobacco crops in China. Phytopathology , 2011, 101(3): 377-387.
[24] 崔晓艳, 陈新, 顾和平, 张红梅, 陈华涛, 袁星星. 马铃薯Y病毒属病毒P3和P3-PiPo蛋白功能研究进展. 微生物学通报, 2012, 39(1): 99-105.
[25] Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods
