研究报告

多NER基因多态的交互作用与移植排斥的发病风险相关

展开
  • 1. 普通外科研究所暨器官移植科,中国医科大学附属一院,沈阳 110001
    2. 普通外科研究所暨肿瘤研究所肿瘤病因与筛查研究室,中国医科大学附属一院,辽宁省高校肿瘤病因与预防重点实验室,沈阳 110001
王本刚,博士,讲师,研究方向:器官移植。E-mail: wangbengang2008@163.com|刘永锋,博士,教授,研究方向:器官移植。E-mail: liuyongfengsubmit@163.com

收稿日期: 2016-08-26

  修回日期: 2016-11-17

  网络出版日期: 2017-12-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31200968)

Interactions among polymorphisms of NER genes prompt the risk of transplantation rejection

Expand
  • 1. Organ Transplantation Department of General Surgery Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
    2. Tumor Etiology and Screening Department of Cancer Institute and General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Prevention (China Medical University), Liaoning Provincial Education Department, Shenyang 110001, China

Received date: 2016-08-26

  Revised date: 2016-11-17

  Online published: 2017-12-24

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31200968)

摘要

基因间SNP-SNP的交互作用较单一SNP对于疾病的预警作用可能会达到更优的检测效能。本研究探讨了核苷酸切除修复(NER)系统基因中SNP交互作用对移植排斥反应发病风险的预警作用。通过Sequenom MassARRAY平台进行基因分型,对8个NER基因中的38个多态进行了检测,包括XPAXPCDDB2XPB (ERCC3)、XPD (ERCC2)、ERCC1XPF (ERCC4)和XPG (ERCC5)基因。单体型分析结果显示,XPA rs3176629-rs2808668 C-T单体型以及ERCC5 G-C-C-T和G-C-T-C单体型可以增加移植排斥反应的发病风险(分别为OR = 1.81,OR=7.72和OR=3.46),而ERCC5 rs2094258-rs751402-rs2296147-rs1047768 A-C-T-T单体型降低了该风险(OR = 0.35)。多因素Logistic回归与多因子降维(MDR)分析均表明,ERCC2 rs50871、ERCC5 rs1047768和XPC rs2228001多态对于发生移植排斥反应存在基因间SNP-SNP的交互作用。因此,XPC rs2228001、ERCC2 rs50871、ERCC5 rs1047768三者的交互作用与移植排斥反应的发病风险相关。

本文引用格式

王本刚, 吕执, 徐倩, 刘永锋 . 多NER基因多态的交互作用与移植排斥的发病风险相关[J]. 遗传, 2017 , 39(1) : 22 -31 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.16-295

Abstract

Better efficacy for predicting the risk of transplantation rejection could be achieved by intergenic interactions among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) compared with one SNP. In this study, we explored the forewarning function of interactions among SNPs in nucleotide excision repair (NER) genes. Thirty-eight polymorphisms in eight NER genes were genotyped by Sequenom MassARRAY platform, including XPA, XPC, DDB2, XPB (ERCC3), XPD (ERCC2), ERCC1, XPF (ERCC4), and XPG (ERCC5). The haplotype analysis suggested that XPA rs3176629-rs2808668 C-T and ERCC5 G-C-C-T and G-C-T-C (OR = 1.81, 7.72 and 3.46, respectively) increased the risk of transplantation rejection; while ERCC5 rs2094258-rs751402-rs2296147-rs1047768 A-C-T-T decreased the risk (OR = 0.35). Multiple logistic regression and multifactor dimensionality reduction (DMR) analyses consistently revealed intergenic interactions among ERCC2 rs50871, ERCC5 rs1047768, and XPC rs2228001 SNPs for the risk of transplantation rejection. Taken together, the interactions among XPC rs2228001, ERCC2 rs50871 and ERCC5 rs1047768 SNPs were associated with the risk of transplantation rejection.

参考文献

[1] Fiorini RN, Nicoud IB, Fiorini JH. The use of genomics and proteomics for the recognition of transplantation rejection of solid organs. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq, 2009, 3(1): 1-6.
[2] Ardoin SP, Pisetsky DS. The role of cell death in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease: HMGB1 and microparticles as intercellular mediators of inflammation. Mod Rheumatol, 2008, 18(4): 319-326.
[3] Krüger B, Schr?ppel B. Genetic variations and transplant outcomes. Nephron Clin Pract, 2011, 118(1): c49-c54.
[4] Krüger B, Krick S, Dhillon N, Lerner SM, Ames S, Bromberg JS, Lin M, Walsh L, Vella J, Fischereder M, Kr?mer BK, Colvin RB, Heeger PS, Murphy BT, Schr?ppel B. Donor Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to ischemia and reperfusion injury following human kidney transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(9): 3390-3395.
[5] Kolesar L, Novota P, Krasna E, Slavcev A, Viklicky O, Honsova E, Striz I. Polymorphism of interleukin-18 promoter influences the onset of kidney graft function after transplantation. Tissue Antigens, 2007, 70(5): 363-368.
[6] Land WG, Agostinis P, Gasser S, Garg AD, Linkermann A. Transplantation and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Am J Transplant, 2016, doi: 10.1111/ajt.13963.
[7] Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Formica RN Jr, Poggio ED, Parikh CR. Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2009, 24(3): 1039-1047.
[8] Gennery AR. Primary immunodeficiency syndromes associated with defective DNA double-strand break repair。 Br Med Bull, 2006, 77-78: 71-85.
[9] Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2002, 11(12): 1513-1530.
[10] Liu JW, He CY, Xing CZ, Yuan Y. Nucleotide excision repair related gene polymorphisms and genetic susceptibility, chemotherapeutic sensitivity and prognosis of gastric. cancer Mutat Res/Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen, 2014, 765: 11-21.
[11] Singh R, Manchanda PK, Kesarwani P, Srivastava A, Mittal RD. Influence of genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTT1 and GSTP1 on allograft outcome in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant, 2009, 23(4): 490-498.
[12] Israni AK, Li N, Cizman BB, Snyder J, Abrams J, Joffe M, Rebbeck T, Feldman HI. Association of donor inflammation- and apoptosis-related genotypes and delayed allograft function after kidney transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis, 2008, 52(2): 331-339.
[13] Breulmann B, Bantis C, Siekierka M, Blume C, Aker S, Kuhr N, Grabensee B, Ivens K. Influence of cytokine genes polymorphisms on long-term outcome in renal transplantation. Clin Transplant, 2007, 21(5): 615-621.
文章导航

/