技术与方法

染色体微阵列分析技术在2600例流产物中的应用

展开
  • 1. 北京金域医学检验实验室有限公司,北京 100010
    2. 广州金域医学检验中心有限公司,广州 510330
彭继苹,硕士研究生,研究方向:分子遗传学。E-mail: pengjiping0419@163.com

收稿日期: 2018-06-29

  修回日期: 2018-08-03

  网络出版日期: 2018-08-03

Application of chromosomal microarray analysis for a cohort of 2600 Chinese patients with miscarriage

Expand
  • 1. Beijing Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory, Beijing 100010, China
    2. Guangzhou Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou510330, China

Received date: 2018-06-29

  Revised date: 2018-08-03

  Online published: 2018-08-03

摘要

染色体微阵列分析(chromosomal microarray analysis, CMA)是一种通过对染色体进行全基因组扫描来筛查染色体数目和结构异常的检测技术,是儿科和产前遗传诊断的常规工具,已被应用于流产病因分析。本研究应用CMA技术在全基因组水平分析引起流产的染色体异常情况,并评估该技术在临床流产中的应用价值。对收集的2600例流产样本进行CMA技术检测,成功检测了2505例,成功率高达96.3%,其中1021例用CytoScan Optima芯片进行检测,1211例用CytoScan 750K芯片进行检测,273例用CytoScan HD芯片进行检测。利用这3种芯片共检出967例(38.60%)样本发生染色体异常,其中通过CytoScan Optima芯片检出506例(50.00%),CytoScan 750K芯片检出388例(32.00%),CytoScan HD芯片检出73例(26.74%)。在967例染色体异常中,有801例(82.83%)发生染色体数目异常,94例(9.72%)发生染色体结构异常,56例(5.79%)发生嵌合体,16例(1.65%)检出纯合区域。本研究结果表明,CMA可应用于临床流产物的遗传学诊断,是一种可靠、稳定、高分辨的技术,其检测结果能够对再生育风险评估提供指导。

本文引用格式

彭继苹, 袁海明 . 染色体微阵列分析技术在2600例流产物中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2018 , 40(9) : 779 -788 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.18-120

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is a technique for screening numerical and structural abnormalities of chromosomes at the whole genome level. It is a routine tool for pediatric and prenatal genetic diagnoses. It has also been applied to investigate the genetic etiologies of miscarriages. In our study, we used the CMA technology to analyze the chromosomal variations of fetuses from miscarriages at the whole genome level, and to evaluate its clinical applications in studies of miscarriages. The CMA analyses were performed on 2600 miscarriage specimens, of which 2505 specimens (96.35%) were successfully analyzed. Among them, 1021 specimens were analyzed with CytoScan Optima chip; 1211 specimens were analyzed with CytoScan 750K chip; and 273 cases were analyzed with CytoScan HD chip. Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 967 specimens (38.6%) by these 3 kinds of chips, of which 506 specimens (50.00%) were detected with CytoScan Optima chip; 388 specimens were detected by CytoScan 750K chip (32.00%); and 73 cases (26.74%) were detected in CytoScan HD chip. Among the 967 cases of chromosomal abnormalities, 801 cases (82.83%) were numerical chromosomal abnormalities; 94 cases (9.72%) were structural abnormalities; 56 cases (5.79%) were mosaicisms; and 16 (1.65%) were regions of homozygosity. Our research suggests that CMA is a reliable, robust, and high-resolution technology for genetic diagnosis of miscarriage in clinical practice, which can also provide results as guidance for the risk assessment of assisted fertility.

参考文献

[1] Muttukrishna S, Jauniaux E, Greenwold N, McGarrigle H, Jivraj S, Carter S, Elgaddal S, Groome N, Regan L . Circulating levels of inhibin A, activin A and follistatin in missed and recurrent miscarriages. Hum Reprod, 2002,17(12):3072-3078.
[2] van den Berg MM, van Maarle MC, van Wely M, Goddijn M . Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2012,1822(12):1951-1959.
[3] Rai R, Regan L . Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet, 2006,368(9535):601-611.
[4] Goddijn M, Leschot NJ . Genetic aspects of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2000,14(5):855-865.
[5] Meng JL . Application of chromosome microarray analysis in the diagnosis of prenatal genetic diseases. Prog Obstetr Gynecol, 2015,24(5):390-393.
[5] 孟金来 . 染色体微阵列分析技术在产前遗传性疾病诊断中的应用进展. 现代妇产科进展, 2015,24(5):390-393.
[6] Wang Y, Cheng Q, Meng L, Luo C, Hu H, Zhang J, Cheng J, Xu T, Jiang T, Liang D, Hu P, Xu Z . Clinical application of SNP array analysis in first-trimester pregnancy loss: a prospective study. Clin Genet, 2017,91(6):849-858.
[7] Shearer BM, Thorland EC, Carlson AW, Jalal SM, Ketterling RP . Reflex fluorescent in situ hybridization testing for unsuccessful product of conception cultures: a retrospective analysis of 5555 samples attempted by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Genet Med, 2011,13(6):545-552.
[8] Haoud K, Mellali S, Gouas L, Tchirkov A, Vago P, Moulessehoul S . Prevalence of aneuploidies in products of spontaneous abortion: interest of FISH and MLPA. Morphologie, 2014,98(320):40-46.
[9] Warren JE, Turok DK, Maxwell TM, Brothman AR, Silver RM . Array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic evaluation of fetal loss between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol, 2009,114(5):1093-1102.
[10] Dhillon RK, Hillman SC, Morris RK, McMullan D, Williams D, Coomarasamy A, Kilby MD . Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG, 2014,121(1):11-21.
[11] Reddy UM, Page GP, Saade GR, Silver RM, Thorsten VR, Parker CB, Pinar H, Willinger M, Stoll BJ, Heim-Hall J, Varner MW, Goldenberg RL, Bukowski R, Wapner RJ, Drews-Botsch CD, O'Brien BM, Dudley DJ, Levy B, NICHD Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network . Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med, 2012,367(23):2185-2193.
[12] Gao J, Liu C, Yao F, Hao N, Zhou J, Zhou Q, Zhang L, Liu X, Bian X, Liu J . Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion. Mol Cytoge
文章导航

/