综述

动物基因组选配方法与应用

展开
  • 1. 湖南农业大学动物科技学院,长沙410128
    2. 美国威斯康星大学动物科学系,威斯康星州麦迪逊市53706
    3. 美国纽勤公司生物信息与生物统计部,内布拉斯加州林肯市68504
何俊,博士,副教授,研究方向:动物遗传育种。E-mail:hejun@hunau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2019-02-28

  修回日期: 2019-05-10

  网络出版日期: 2019-05-27

基金资助

湖南省科技计划重点项目(2018NK2081);长沙市科技计划重点项目(kq1801014);湖南省畜禽安全协同创新中心项目资助

Methods and applications of animal genomic mating

Expand
  • 1. CollegeofAnimalScienceand Technology, HunanAgricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    2. Department of Animal Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI 53706, USA
    3. Biostatisticsand Bioinformatics, NeogenGeneSeek, LincolnNE 68504, USA

Received date: 2019-02-28

  Revised date: 2019-05-10

  Online published: 2019-05-27

Supported by

Supported by Key Project of Scientific Research Plan of Hunan Province(2018NK2081);Key Project of Scientific Research Plan of Changsha city(kq1801014);Hundred-Talent Project of Hunan Province and Hunan Innovation Center of Animal Safety Production

摘要

基因组选择(genomic selection, GS)是利用覆盖基因组的分子标记预测动物个体的估计育种值,可以提高选择的准确度和选择强度,缩短世代间隔,做到早选、准选,使动物育种发生了巨大变革。过去的10多年间,基因组选择技术应用于奶牛等动物的育种中,使种用动物的选择更为准确,遗传进展得到大幅提高。但基因组选择通常重视目标性状的遗传进展,而忽略了配种亲本个体间的遗传关系,因此也没有考虑到后代群体中近交程度的增加、遗传多样性的降低以及有害基因的纯合等问题,因此难以维持长期的遗传进展。2016年,一种具有可持续性的遗传选择方法被正式提出,称为基因组选配(genomic mating, GM)。该方法利用待选种用个体的基因组信息实施优化的选种和选配,可以控制群体近交的增长速率,实现长期且可持续的遗传进展。因此基因组选配方法比基因组选择的方法更适合于现代动物育种,尤其适用于地方品种的保护和遗传改良。本文综述了基因组选配的基本概念、方法和应用,并通过模拟的方法比较了6种选配方案的选择效果,旨在为动物育种方法的应用提供参考。

本文引用格式

何俊,Fernando B. Lopes,吴晓林 . 动物基因组选配方法与应用[J]. 遗传, 2019 , 41(6) : 486 -493 . DOI: 10.16288/j.yczz.19-053

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is a powerful tool which can be used to estimate the breeding value of individual animals by using the molecular markers of the animal’s entire genome. GS improves the accuracy and intensity of selection, reduces the interval of generation, and realizes the effects of early accuracy selection contributing to a significant evolution in animal breeding. In the past decade, GS was successfully applied in the genetic improvement of dairy animals with improved selection accuracy and genetic gain of breeding animals. However, GS focuses on the genetic gain of target traits while it ignores the genetic relationship between mating pairs such that it ignores long term genetic merits such as an increase in inbreeding coefficient of offspring population, a decrease of genetic diversity and the homozygous presentation of harmful genes. In 2016, genomic mating (GM) was proposed as a sustainable genetic selection method using genomic information of the breeding candidate individuals to optimize selection and mating with resultant control of the growth rate of population inbreeding coefficient and achieving long-term and sustainable genetic progress. Therefore, GM is more suitable for modern animal breeding than GS, especially for the genetic improvement of indigenous species. In this review, we summarize the basic concepts, methods, and applications of GM, and then present examples comparing the effects of six simulated mating schemes. This review serves as a valuable reference for the applications of animal breeding methods.

参考文献

[1] Gianola D, Rosa GJ . One hundred years of statistical developments in animal breeding. Annu Rev AnimBiosci, 2014,3:19-56.
[2] Henderson C R . Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics, 1975,31(2):423-447.
[3] Vergara OD, Elzo MA, Cerón-Mu?oz MF . Genetic parameters and genetic trends for age at first calving and calving interval in an angus- blancoorejinegro-zebu multibreed cattle population in colombia. LivestSci, 2009,126(1):318-322.
[4] Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ . Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J dairy sci, 2010,93(2):743-752.
[5] Caetano SL, Savegnago RP, Boligon AA, Ramos SB, Chud TCS, L?bo RB, Munari DP . Estimates of genetic parameters for carcass, growth and reproductive traits in nellore cattle. LivestSci, 2013,155(1):1-7.
[6] Lopes FB, da Silva MC, Magnabosco CU, GoncalvesNarciso MG, Sainz RD . Selection indices and multivariate analysis show similar results in the evaluation of growth and carcass traits in beef cattle. PLoS One, 2016,11(1):e0147180.
[7] Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME . Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 2001,157(4):1819-1829.
[8] Meuwissen T. Genomic selection: the future of marker assisted selection and animal breeding. In: Proceedings of Electronic forum on biotechnology in food and agriculture. MAS: a fast track to increase genetic gain in plant and animal breeding, Session II: MAS in animals. FAO, Conference 10. University of Turin via L. da Vinci 44, Grugliasco (TO), Italy. 2003, 54-59.
[9] Goddard ME, Hayes BJ . Genomic selection. J Anim breed Genet, 2007,124(6):323-330.
[10] VanRaden PM . Practical implications for genetic modeling in the genomics era. J Dairy Sci, 2016,99(3):2405-2412.
[11] Tan C, Bian C, Yang D, Li N, Wu ZF, Hu XX . Application of genomic selection in farm animal breeding. Hereditas(Beijing), 2017,39(11):1033-1045.
[11] 谈成, 边成, 杨达, 李宁, 吴珍芳, 胡晓湘, 李明洲 . 基因组选择技术在农业动物育种中的应用. 遗传, 2017,39(11):1033-1045.
[12] Wiggans GR, Cole JB, Hubbard SM, Sonstegard TS . Genomic selection in dairy cattle: The USDA experience. Annu Rev AnimBiosci, 2017,5:309-327.
[13] Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M . Accelerating improvement of livestock with genomic selection. Annu Rev AnimBiosci, 2013,1:221-237.
[14] de los Campos G, Hickey JM, Po
文章导航

/