遗传资源数字序列信息在提高作物产量和减少疫病影响的研究中发挥着日益重要的作用，但其权利保护体系尚不完善，阻碍了遗传资源的保护与利用，制约了《生物多样性公约》所确立的公平公正惠益分享目标的实现。针对上述问题，本文首先通过界定遗传资源数字序列信息的内涵与属性，阐明了其与以信息为客体的现代知识产权制度具有内在的契合性，并论证了其受知识产权保护应满足新颖性、实用性的实体条件以及必要的注册登记程序条件。在此基础上，揭示了现行知识产权模式的适用困境，提出了遗传资源数字序列信息专门权的规范构造方案。方案将专门权的主体划分为两个层次：静态的权利归属于国家；动态的权利由特定社区的农民集体和数字序列信息的上传者依不同权能分别行使。权利人享有基于许可的知情同意权、来源标示权和惠益分享权，同时设置适用范围、强制许可、保护期限等权利限制制度。该方案对实现权益平衡、促进动植物育种创新及遗传多样性保护具有重要意义。

Digital sequence information on genetic resources plays an increasingly vital role in research on improving crop yields and reducing impacts of disease. However, there are still problems such as the imperfect rights’ protection system, which hinders the protection and sustainable use of genetic resources and constrains the realization of the fair and equitable benefit-sharing objectives established by the Convention on Biological Diversity. To address these issues, we first define the connotation and legal nature of digital sequence information on genetic resources. Then, we elaborate how digital sequence information on genetic resources aligns with the modern intellectual property systems. For digital sequence information on genetic resources to be protected by intellectual property rights, we analyze the substantive conditions of novelty and practicality as well as the procedural conditions of registration. Building on this analysis, we identify the limitations of existing intellectual property frameworks in accommodating digital sequence information on genetic resources, and propose a normative structure of sui generis right of digital sequence information on genetic resources. The subjects of sui generis right are divided into two levels, i.e. static right attributed to the state, and dynamic right exercised by the farmer collective of specific communities and the uploaders of digital sequence information, exercising respectively in accordance with different functions. The contents of sui generis right include the informed consent right, the source indication right and benefit-sharing right based on licensing. Furthermore, we propose to establish the limitations on sui generis right, such as restriction on scope of application, compulsory licensing and protection periods. This framework established here is of great significance for achieving the balance of rights and interests, promoting innovation in plant breeding and protecting genetic diversity.