[1] McNitt JI, Lukefahr SD. Breed and environmental effects on postweaning growth of rabbits. J Anim Sci, 1993, 71(8): 1996-2005.[2] Larzul C, Gondret F, Combes S, de Rochambeau H. Di-vergent selection on 63-day body weight in the rabbit: response on growth, carcass and muscle traits. Genet Sel Evol, 2005, 37(1): 105-122.[3] Moura ASAMT, Costa ARC, Polastre R. Variance components and response to selection for reproductive, litter and growth traits through a multi-purpose index. World Rabbit Sci, 2001, 9(2): 77-86.[4] Prayaga KC, Eady SJ. Rabbit farming for meat production in Australia: Preliminary estimates of economic values for production traits. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 2000, 13(Suppl.): 357-359.[5] Krogmeier D, Dzapo V, Mao IL. Additive genetic and maternal effects on postweaning growth and carcass traits in rabbits. J Anim Breed Genet, 1994, 111(1-6): 289-297.[6] Garreau H, Bolet G, Larzul C, Robert-Granié C, Saleil G, SanCristobal M, Bodin L. Results of four generations of a canalising selection for rabbit birth weight. Livest Sci, 2008, 119(1-3): 55-62.[7] Piles M, García ML, Rafel O, Ramon J, Baselga M. Genetics of litter size in three maternal lines of rabbits: Repeatability versus multiple-trait models. J Anim Sci, 2006, 84(9): 2309-2315.[8] Estany J, Camacho J, Baselga M, Blasco A. Selection response of growth rate in rabbits for meat production. Genet Sel Evol, 1992, 24(6): 527-537.[9] Gómez EA, Rafel O, Ramon J. Preliminary genetic analy-ses of Caldes line: A selection experiment for a global objective. In: Proceeding of the 7th World Rabbit Congress. Valencia, Spain, 2000: 417-424.[10] Lukefahr SD, Odi HB, Atakora JK. Mass selection for 70-day body weight in rabbits. J Anim Sci, 1996, 74(7): 1481-1489.[11] Quevedo F, Cervera C, Blas E, Baselga M, Costa C, Pascual JJ. Effect of selection for litter size and feeding pro-gramme on the performance of young rabbit females dur-ing rearing and first pregnancy. Anim Sci, 2005, 80(2): 161-168.[12] García ML, Baselga M. Estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size of rabbits using a cryopreserved control population. Livest Prod Sci, 2002, 74(1): 45-53.[13] Al-Saef AM, Khalil MH, Al-Homidan AH, Al-Dobaib SN, Al-Sobayil KA, García ML, Baselga M. Crossbreeding effects for litter and lactation traits in a Saudi project to develop new lines of rabbits suitable for hot climates. Livest Sci, 2008, 118(3): 238-246.[14] Blasco A, Ortega JA, Climent A, Santacreu MA. Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. I. Genetic pa-rameters and response to selection. J Anim Sci, 2005, 83 (10): 2297-2302.[15] Mocé ML, Santacreu MA, Climent A, Blasco A. Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. III. Responses in uterine capacity and its components estimated with a cryopreserved control population. J Anim Sci, 2005, 83 (10): 2308-2312.[16] Santacreu MA, Mocé ML, Climent A, Blasco A. Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. II. Correlated response on litter size and its components estimated with a cryopreserved control population. J Anim Sci, 2005, 83 (10): 2303-2307.[17] Bolet G, Garreau H, Joly T, Theau-Clément M, Falieres J, Hurtaud J, Bodin L. Genetic homogenisation of birth weight in rabbits: Indirect selection response for uterine horn characteristics. Livest Sci, 2007, 111(1-2): 28-32.[18] Estany J, Baselga M, Blasco A, Camacho J. Mixed model methodology for the estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size of rabbits. Livest Prod Sci, 1989, 21(1): 67-75.[19] Gómez EA, Rafel O, Ramon J, Baselga M. A genetic study of a line selected on litter size at weaning. In: Proceeding of the 6th World Rabbit Congress. Toulouse, France, 199 |