自然资源的合理利用和生态环境保护是人类实现可持续发展的基础, 生物多样性的研究和保护已成为世界各国普遍关注的重大问题。农作物病害是农业生产上重要的生物灾害, 是制约农业可持续发展的主要因素之一, 抗病品种大面积单一化种植导致了农业生物多样性水平严重降低, 因而农业生物多样性的过度丧失已成为可持续农业所面临的主要难题。利用生物多样性持续控制作物病害能减轻作物病害发生和作物产量损失, 达到保护作物多样性, 减少农药过量施用给农业生态环境造成破坏的最终目的, 而揭示生物多样性控制作物病害的机制能有效地指导生产上对不同作物进行合理布局和轮换, 建立作物不同组合的优化搭配和种植模式。文章从分子、生理和生态水平研究农业生物多样性控制作物病害的机制、以及影响作物多样性控制病害的因素、覆盖作物等几方面对生物多样性控制作物病害的研究进展进行概述, 同时对今后生物多样性控制作物病害机制还需加强的研究部分进行了展望。
Reasonable utilization of natural resource and protection of ecological environment is the foundation for implementing agricultural sustainable development. Biodiversity research and protection are becoming an important issue concerned commonly in the world. Crop disease is one of the important natural disasters for food production and safety, and is also one of the main reasons that confine sustainable development of agricultural production. Large-scale deployment of single highly resistant variety results in reduction of agro-biodiversity level. In this case, excessive loss of agro-biodiversity has become the main challenge in sustainable agriculture. Biodiversity can not only effectively alleviate disease incidence and loss of crop production, but also reduce pollution of agricultural ecological environment caused by excessive application of pesticides and fertilizers to the agricultural ecological environment. Discovery of the mechanism of biodiversity to control crop diseases can reasonably guide the rational deployment and rotation of different crops and establish optimization combinations of different crops. This review summarizes recent advances of research on molecular, physiological, and ecological mechanisms of biodiversity managing crop diseases, and proposes some research that needs to be strengthened in the future.
[1] Noberg J, Swaney DP, Dushoff J, Casagrandi R, Levin SA. Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in chang-ing environments: A theoretical framework. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98(20): 11376-11381.
[2] Reusch TBH, Ehlers A, Hämmerli A, Worm B. Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2005, 102(8): 2826-2831.
[3] Zhu YY, Chen HR, Fan JH, Wang YY, Li Y, Chen JB, Fan JX, Yang SS, Hu LP, Leung H, Mew TW, Teng PS, Wang ZH, Mundt CC. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature, 2000, 406(6797): 718-722.
[4] Smale M, Bellon MR, Jarvis D, Sthapit B. Economic con-cepts for designing policies to conserve crop genetic resources on-farms. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2004, 51(2): 121-135.
[5] Kremen C, Ricketts T. Global perspectives on pollination disruptions. Conserv Biol, 2000, 14(5): 1226-1228.
[6] Ricketts TH. Tropical forest fragments enhance pollinator activity in nearby coffee crops. Conserv Biol, 2004, 18(5): 1262-1271.
[7] Richards AJ. Does low biodiversity resulting from modern agricultural practices affect crop pollination and yield? Ann Bot, 2001, 88(2): 165-172.
[8] Ou SH. Rice Disease. 2nd ed. Kew UK: Common-Wealth Mycological Institute, 1985.
[9] 李成云, 陈琼珠, 陈宗麒, 罗朝喜, 林长生, 伊势一男. 云南省稻瘟病菌的交配型分布. 中国农业科学, 1996, 29(6): 60-64.
[10] 朱有勇. 遗传多样性与作物病害持续控制. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007.
[11] Mew TW, Borrmeo E, Hardy B. Exploiting Biodiversity for Sustainable Pest Management. Philippine: Interna-tional Rice Research, 2001.
[12] Villaréal LMMA, Lannou C. Selection for increased spore efficacy by host genetic background in a wheat powdery mildew population. Phytopathology, 2000, 90(12): 1300-1306.
[13] Huang R, Kranz J, Welz HG. Selection of pathotypes of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in pure and mixed stands of spring barley. Plant Pathol, 1994, 43(3): 458-470.
[14] Wolfe MS, Barret JA. Can we lead the pathogen astray? Plant Dis, 1980, 64(2): 148-151.
[15] Wolfe MS. The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 1985, 23(1): 251-273.
[16] Garrett KA, Mundt CC. Host diversity can reduce potato late blight severity for focal and general patterns of pri-mary inoculum. Phytopathology, 2000, 90(12): 1307-1312.
[17] Rhoades RE, Bebbington AJ. Mixting it up: variations in Andean farmers’ rationales for intercropping of potatoes. Field Crops Res, 1990, 25(1-2): 145-156.
[18] Garrett KA, Nelson RJ, Mundt CC, Chacón RE, Jaramllo RE, Forbes GA. The effect of host diversity and other management components on epidemics of potato late blight in the humid highland tropics. Phytopathol, 2001, 91(10): 993-1000.
[19] 刘二明, 朱有勇, 刘新民, 张顺元, 刘安民, 叶华智. 丘陵区水稻品种多样性混合间栽控制稻瘟病研究. 作物研究, 2002, 16(1): 7-10.
[20] 顾明华, 黎晓峰. 硅对减轻水稻的铝胁迫效应及其机理研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(3): 360-366.
[21] Gu MH, KoyaMa H, Hara T. Effects of silicon supply on amelioration of aluminum injury and chemical forms of aluminum in rice plants. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1998, 69(5): 498-505.
[22] Cocker KM, Evans DE, Hodson MJ. The amelioration of aluminium toxicity by silicon in higher plants: Solution chemistry or an in planta mechanism? Plant Physiol, 1998, 104(4): 608-614.
[23] Hodson MJ, Sangster AG. The interaction between silicon and aluminum in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench: Growth an analysis and X-ray microanalysis. Aan Bot, 1993, 72(5): 389-400.
[24] Hara T, Gu MH, Koyana H. Ameliorative effect of silicon on aluminum injury in the rice plant. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1999, 45(4): 929-936.
[25] 唐旭, 郑毅, 汤利, 张朝春, 朱有勇, 张福锁. 不同品种间作条件下的氮硅营养对水稻稻瘟病发生的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(6): 663-666.
[26] 高尔明, 赵全志. 水稻施用硅肥增产的生理效应研究. 耕作与栽培, 1998, 28(5): 20-22.
[27] Hipps
