猪早期胚胎发育中SOX2基因启动子活性分析

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.19-045

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Hereditas(Beijing) ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 950-961.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.19-045

• Research Article • Previous Articles Next Articles

Analysis of SOX2 gene promoter activity in porcine early embryonic development

Jianchao Zhao,Zhuang Chai,Shimeng Guo,Zhonghua Liu()

College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

Received:2019-02-21 Revised:2019-06-17 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-07-04
Contact: Liu Zhonghua E-mail:liuzhonghua@neau.edu.cn
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No.(31872360)

Abstract

Abstract:

SOX2 (sex determining region Y-box2) is one of the critical pluripotent factors that play a crucial role in the first lineage differentiation and maintenance of pluripotency in inner cell mass during early embryonic development. However, there are few researches about the regulation of the SOX2 promoter, especially in Sus scrofa. To analyzed the activity of SOX2 promoter in early porcine embryos, we determined the control system and established the microinjection system for assessing SOX2 promoter activity by analyzing the embryonic development and the expression of enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) after micro-injected different EGFP plasmids at different times after activation of the oocytes. Then, we analyzed the structure of 5000 bp upstream of the SOX2 translation initiation site and found there were four transcription factor binding site clusters. Next, we designed and constructed promoter-containing plasmids to analyze the function of each cluster. To detect the activity of different promoters, we assessed the mCherry expression in protein levels and mRNA levels by analyzing the mCherry fluorescence intensity and qRT-PCR after injecting plasmids into embryos. These results showed that the activity of the shorted promoter, with the region from 2254 bp to 2442 bp upstream of translation initiation site deleted, decreased to 17.8% at 4-cell and 8-cell stages compared with the full-length promoter. This region included two NF-AT transcription factor binding sites, which indicated that the NF-AT binding site is a key region to regulate the activity of the SOX2 promoter. The results provide important data for determination the mechanism of porcine SOX2 regulation.

Key words: SOX2 gene, promoter activity, pig

Jianchao Zhao, Zhuang Chai, Shimeng Guo, Zhonghua Liu. Analysis of SOX2 gene promoter activity in porcine early embryonic development[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2019, 41(10): 950-961.

References 42

[1]	Sarkar A, Hochedlinger K . The sox family of transcription factors: versatile regulators of stem and progenitor cell fate. Cell Stem Cell, 2013,12(1):15-30.
[2]	Liang S, Furuhashi M, Nakane R, Nakazawa S, Goudarzi H, Hamada J, Iizasa H . Isolation and characterization of human breast cancer cells with sox2 promoter activity. Biochem Bioph Res Co, 2013,437(2):205-211.
[3]	Zhu F, Qian W, Zhang H, Liang Y, Wu M, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Gao Q, Li Y . Sox2 is a marker for stem-like tumor cells in bladder cancer. Stem Cell Rep, 2017,9(2):429-437.
[4]	Stolzenburg S, Rots MG, Beltran AS, Rivenbark AG, Yuan X, Qian H, Strahl BD, Blancafort P . Targeted silencing of the oncogenic transcription factor sox2 in breast cancer. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012,40(14):6725-6740.
[5]	Wang Z, Oron E, Nelson B, Razis S, Ivanova N . Distinct lineage specification roles for nanog, oct4, and sox2 in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2012,10(4):440-454.
[6]	Arnold K, Sarkar A, Yram MA, Polo JM, Bronson R, Sengupta S, Seandel M, Geijsen N, Hochedlinger K . Sox2(+) adult stem and progenitor cells are important for tissue regeneration and survival of mice. Cell Stem Cell, 2011,9(4):317-329.
[7]	Hu Y H, Yao JH . Progress on pluripotency factors in zebrafish. Hereditas (Beijing), 2012,34(9):1097-1107.
	胡雨, 姚纪花 . 斑马鱼多能性因子的研究进展. 遗传, 2012,34(9):1097-1107.
[8]	Rizzino A, Wuebben EL . Sox2/oct4: a delicately balanced partnership in pluripotent stem cells and embryogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2016,1859(6):780-791.
[9]	White MD, Angiolini JF, Alvarez YD, Kaur G, Zhao ZW, Mocskos E, Bruno L, Bissiere S, Levi V, Plachta N . Long-lived binding of sox2 to DNA predicts cell fate in the four-cell mouse embryo. Cell, 2016,165(1):75-87.
[10]	Avilion AA, Nicolis SK, Pevny LH, Perez L, Vivian N, Lovell-Badge R . Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on sox2 function. Genes Dev, 2003,17(1):126-140.
[11]	Wicklow E, Blij S, Frum T, Hirate Y, Lang RA, Sasaki H, Ralston A . Hippo pathway members restrict sox2 to the inner cell mass where it promotes icm fates in the mouse blastocyst. PLoS Genet, 2014,10(10):e1004618.
[12]	Liu S, Bou G, Sun R, Guo S, Xue B, Wei R, Cooney AJ, Liu Z . Sox2 is the faithful marker for pluripotency in pig: evidence from embryonic studies. Dev Dynam, 2015,244(4):619-627.
[13]	Wu Z, Chen J, Ren J, Bao L, Liao J, Cui C, Rao L, Li H, Gu Y, Dai H, Zhu H, Teng X, Cheng L, Xiao L . Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a drug-inducible system. J Mol Cell Biol, 2009,1(1):46-54.
[14]	Gu Q, Hao J, Hai T, Wang J, Jia Y, Kong Q, Wang J, Feng C, Xue B, Xie B, Liu S, Li J, He Y, Sun J, Liu L, Wang L, Liu Z, Zhou Q . Efficient generation of mouse escs-like pig induced pluripotent stem cells. Protein Cell, 2014,5(5):338-342.
[15]	Esteban MA, Xu J, Yang J, Peng M, Qin D, Li W, Jiang Z, Chen J, Deng K, Zhong M, Cai J, Lai L, Pei D . Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from tibetan miniature pig. J Biol Chem, 2009,284(26):17634-17640.
[16]	West FD, Uhl EW, Liu Y, Stowe H, Lu Y, Yu P, Gallegos-Cardenas A, Pratt SL, Stice SL . Brief report: chimeric pigs produced from induced pluripotent stem cells demonstrate germline transmission and no evidence of tumor formation in young pigs. Stem Cells, 2011,29(10):1640-1643.
[17]	Fan N, Chen J, Shang Z, Dou H, Ji G, Zou Q, Wu L, He L, Wang F, Liu K, Liu N, Han J, Zhou Q, Pan D, Yang D, Zhao B, Ouyang Z, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Lin L, Zhong C, Wang Q, Wang S, Xu Y, Luan J, Liang Y, Yang Z, Li J, Lu C, Vajta G, Li Z, Ouyang H, Wang H, Wang Y, Yang Y, Liu Z, Wei H, Luan Z, Esteban MA, Deng H, Yang H, Pei D, Li N, Pei G, Liu L, Du Y, Xiao L, Lai L . Piglets cloned from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Res, 2013,23(1):162-166.
[18]	Brevini T, Pennarossa G, Maffei S, Gandolfi F . Pluripotency network in porcine embryos and derived cell lines. Reprod Domest Anim, 2012,47(Suppl. 4):86-91.
[19]	Roberts RM, Yuan Y, Genovese N, Ezashi T . Livestock models for exploiting the promise of pluripotent stem cells. ILAR J, 2015,56(1):74-82.
[20]	Goolam M, Scialdone A, Graham SJL, Macaulay IC, Jedrusik A, Hupalowska A, Voet T, Marioni JC, Zernicka- Goetz M . Heterogeneity in oct4 and sox2 targets biases cell fate in 4-cell mouse embryos. Cell, 2016,165(1):61-74.
[21]	Yang N, Wang Y, Hui L, Li X, Jiang X . Silencing sox2 expression by rna interference inhibits proliferation, invasion and metastasis, and induces apoptosis through map4k4/jnk signaling pathway in human laryngeal cancer tu212 cells. J Histochem Cytochem, 2015,63(9):721-733.
[22]	Rinne A, Banach K, Blatter LA . Regulation of nuclear factor of activated t cells (nfat) in vascular endothelial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol, 2009,47(3):400-410.
[23]	Wiebe MS, Wilder PJ, Kelly D, Rizzino A . Isolation, characterization, and differential expression of the murine sox-2 promoter. Gene, 2000,246(1-2):383-393.
[24]	Lis M, Walther D . The orientation of transcription factor binding site motifs in gene promoter regions: does it matter? BMC Genomics, 2016,17:185.
[25]	Sikorska M, Sandhu JK, Deb-Rinker P, Jezierski A, Leblanc J, Charlebois C, Ribecco-Lutkiewicz M, Bani-Yaghoub M, Walker PR . Epigenetic modifications of sox2 enhancers, srr1 and srr2, correlate with in vitro neural differentiation. J Neurosci Res, 2008,86(8):1680-1693.
[26]	Mojsin M, Topalovic V, Marjanovic Vicentic J, Stevanovic M . Transcription factor nf-y inhibits cell growth and decreases sox2 expression in human embryonal carcinoma cell line nt2/d1. Biochemistry (Mosc), 2015,80(2):202-207.
[27]	Wiebe MS, Wilder PJ, Kelly D, Rizzino A . Isolation, characterization, and differential expression of the murine sox-2 promoter. Gene, 2000,246(1-2):383-393.
[28]	Di Stefano B, Sardina JL, van Oevelen C, Collombet S, Kallin EM, Vicent GP, Lu J, Thieffry D, Beato M, Graf T . C/EBPαpoises b cells for rapid reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 2014,506(7487):235-239.
[29]	Bueno C, Sardina JL, Di Stefano B, Romero-Moya D, Mu?oz-López A, Ariza L, Chillón MC, Balanzategui A, Casta?o J, Herreros A, Fraga MF, Fernández A, Granada I, Quintana-Bustamante O, Segovia JC, Nishimura K, Ohtaka M, Nakanishi M, Graf T, Menendez P . Reprogramming human b cells into induced pluripotent stem cells and its enhancement by c/EBPα. Leukemia, 2016,30(3):674-682.
[30]	Borrelli S, Fanoni D, Dolfini D, Alotto D, Ravo M, Grober OM, Weisz A, Castagnoli C, Berti E, Vigano MA, Mantovani R . C/EBPδgene targets in human keratinocytes. PLoS One, 2010,5(11):e13789.
[31]	Kel A, Kel-Margoulis O, Babenko V, Wingender E . Recognition of nfatp/ap-1 composite elements within genes induced upon the activation of immune cells. J Mol Biol, 1999,288(3):353-376.
[32]	Mantovani R . A survey of 178 nf-y binding ccaat boxes. Nucleic Acids Res, 1998,26(5):1135-1143.
[33]	Grange T, Roux J, Rigaud G, Pictet R . Cell-type specific activity of two glucocorticoid responsive units of rat tyrosine aminotransferase gene is associated with multiple binding sites for c/ebp and a novel liver-specific nuclear factor. Nucleic Acids Res, 1991,19(1):131-139.
[34]	Roth C, Schuierer M, Günther K, Buettner R . Genomic structure and DNA binding properties of the human zinc finger transcriptional repressor ap-2rep (klf12). Genomics, 2000,63(3):384-390.
[35]	Cao S, Han J, Wu J, Li Q, Liu S, Zhang W, Pei Y, Ruan X, Liu Z, Wang X, Lim B, Li N . Specific gene-regulation networks during the pre-implantation development of the pig embryo as revealed by deep sequencing. BMC Genomics, 2014,15:4.
[36]	Hilger-Eversheim K, Moser M, Schorle H, Buettner R . Regulatory roles of ap-2 transcription factors in vertebrate development, apoptosis and cell-cycle control. Gene, 2000,260(1-2):1-12.
[37]	Macián F, López-Rodriguez C, Rao A . Partners in transcription: Nfat and ap-1. Oncogene, 2001,20(19):2476-2489.
[38]	Ning Ding, Yuan Gao, Wang N, Li H . Functional analysis of the chicken pparγ gene 5′flanking region and c/EBPα mediated gene regulation. Comp Biochem Phys B, 2011,158(4):297-303.
[39]	Cheng M, Zhang WJ, Xing TY, Yan XH, Li YM, Li H, Wang N . Functional analysis of the upstream regulatory region of chicken mir-17-92 cluster. Hereditas (Beijing), 2016,38(8):724-735.
	程敏, 张文建, 邢天宇, 闫晓红, 李玉茂, 李辉, 王宁 . 鸡miR-17-92基因簇上游调控区功能分析. 遗传, 2016,38(8):724-735.
[40]	Yu L, Domann FE . Rapid and direct quantitative rt-pcr method to measure promoter activity. Biotechnol Prog, 2006,22(5):1461-1463.
[41]	Zhang S, Magnusson G . Kilham polyomavirus: activation of gene expression and DNA replication in mouse fibroblast cells by an enhancer substitution. J Virol, 2001,75(21):10015-10023.
[42]	Whyte WA, Orlando DA, Hnisz D, Abraham BJ, Lin CY, Kagey MH, Rahl PB, Lee TI, Young RA . Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell, 2013,153(2):307-319.

Metrics

Comments

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号

Analysis of SOX2 gene promoter activity in porcine early embryonic development

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 42

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Wenrui Shi, Hongzhu Qu, Xiangdong Fang. Overview of multi-omics research in gout [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2023, 45(8): 643-657.
[2]	Yanan Li, Xianjun Zhang, Ning Zhang, Yalin Liang, Yuxing Zhang, Huaxing Zhao, Zicong Li, Sixiu Huang. Effects of overexpression of histone H3K9me3 demethylase on development of porcine cloned embryos [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2023, 45(1): 67-77.
[3]	Fei Gao, Yu Wang, Jiaxiang Du, Xuguang Du, Jianguo Zhao, Dengke Pan, Sen Wu, Yaofeng Zhao. Advances and applications of genetically modified pig models in biomedical and agricultural field [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2023, 45(1): 6-28.
[4]	Mengxuan Xu, Ming Zhou. Advances of RNA polymerase IV in controlling DNA methylation and development in plants [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2022, 44(7): 567-580.
[5]	Yan Zhao, Chenxin Wang, Tianming Yang, Chunshuang Li, Lihong Zhang, Dongni Du, Ruoxi Wang, Jing Wang, Min Wei, Xueqing Ba. Linking oxidative DNA lesion 8-OxoG to tumor development and progression [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2022, 44(6): 466-477.
[6]	Hui Qu, Yi Liu, Yawen Chen, Hui Wang. Alteration of imprinted genes and offspring organ development caused by environmental factors [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2022, 44(2): 107-116.
[7]	Yangjinghui Zhang, Peiyao Chang, Zishu Yang, Yuhang Xue, Xueqi Li, Yang Zhang. Advances in epigenetic modification affecting anthocyanin synthesis [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2022, 44(12): 1117-1127.
[8]	Qingwen Zhao, Dongning Pan. Progress on the epigenetic regulation of adipose tissue thermogenesis [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2022, 44(10): 867-880.
[9]	Jiayu Yu, Ting Chen, Zhihua Wang, Juan Zheng, Tianshu Zeng. Diagnosis, treatment and genetic analysis of a case of skin hyperpigmentation as the only manifestation with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2022, 44(10): 983-989.
[10]	Wang Ya'nan, Tao Xu, Wanpeng Wang, Qingzhu Zhang, Xie Li'nan. Role of epigenetic modifications in the development of crops essential traits [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2021, 43(9): 858-879.
[11]	Jiangping He, Jiekai Chen. Epigenetic control of transposable elements and cell fate decision [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2021, 43(9): 822-834.
[12]	Jie Yuan, Shiqing Cai. The regulatory mechanisms of behavioral and cognitive aging [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2021, 43(6): 545-570.
[13]	Tianyi Wang, Yingxiang Wang, Chenjiang You. Structural and functional characteristics of plant PHD domain-containing proteins [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2021, 43(4): 323-339.
[14]	Dingwei Peng, Ruiqiang Li, Wu Zeng, Min Wang, Xuan Shi, Jianhua Zeng, Xiaohong Liu, Yaoshen Chen, Zuyong He. Editing the cystine knot motif of MSTN enhances muscle development of Liang Guang Small Spotted pigs [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2021, 43(3): 261-270.
[15]	Qiang Wei, Yan Ao, Manman Yang, Tao Chen, Hu Han, Xingju Zhang, Ran Wang, Qiuju Xia, Fangfang Jiang, Yong Li. Identification of genomic insertion of dominant-negative GHR mutation transgenes in Wuzhishan pig using whole genome sequencing method [J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2021, 43(12): 1149-1158.