TET蛋白的去甲基化机制及其在调控小鼠发育过程中的作用

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.2015.01.005

遗传 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 34-40.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.2015.01.005

TET蛋白的去甲基化机制及其在调控小鼠发育过程中的作用

贾振伟, 高树新, 张永春, 张显华

内蒙古民族大学动物科技学院,黄牛遗传繁育研究所,通辽 028043

收稿日期:2014-04-08 修回日期:2014-09-20 出版日期:2015-01-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
通讯作者: 张显华,教授,研究方向：配子与胚胎生物技术研究。E-mail: zxh7469@163.com E-mail:zxh7469@163.com
作者简介:贾振伟,博士,研究方向：配子与胚胎生物技术研究。E-mail: zhenwei1999@sina.com
基金资助:
内蒙古民族大学博士科研启动基金项目(编号：BS299)资助

Mechanisms of TET protein-mediated DNA demethylation and its role in the regulation of mouse development

Zhenwei Jia, Shuxin Gao, Yongchun Zhang, Xianhua Zhang

Institute of Yellow Cattle Genetics-Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University for the Nationalities, Tongliao 028000, China

Received:2014-04-08 Revised:2014-09-20 Online:2015-01-20 Published:2015-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： TET(Ten-eleven translocation)蛋白家族共有3个成员,分别为TET1、TET2和TET3,均属于α-酮戊二酸(α-KG)和Fe²⁺依赖的双加氧酶,可以将5-甲基胞嘧啶(5-methylcytosine, 5 mC)氧化为5-羟甲基胞嘧啶(5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5 hmC)、5-甲酰基胞嘧啶(5-formylcytosine, 5 fC)及5-羧基胞嘧啶(5-carboxylcytosine, 5 caC)。研究表明,TET蛋白通过不同机制以主动或被动的方式调控DNA去甲基化,且去甲基化的活性可能受其他因子的调控。TET蛋白广泛参与哺乳动物发育过程的调节,其中在原始生殖细胞的形成、胚胎发育、干细胞多能性及神经和脑发育等方面发挥了重要作用。TET蛋白生物功能的发现为表观遗传学研究开辟了全新的研究领域,而且相关研究结果对拓展生命科学研究具有重要意义。文章综述了TET蛋白家族的结构、去甲基化分子机制及在小鼠发育过程中的作用,为深入了解TET蛋白的功能提供理论基础。

关键词: TET蛋白, 去甲基化, 表观遗传, 小鼠发育

Abstract: TET (ten-eleven translocation) protein family includes three members TET1, TET2 and TET3, which belong to alpha-ketoglutaric acid ( α-KG )- and Fe²⁺-dependent dioxygenase superfamily, and have the capacity to convert 5-methylcytosine (5 mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5 hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5 fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5 caC). At present, growing lines of evidence indicate that TET proteins are involved in the control of active or passive DNA demethylation via different mechanisms; moreover, their activities may be regulated by some cellular factors. TET proteins play vital roles in modulating mammal development, including primordial germ cell formation, embryonic development, stem cells pluripotency, nerve and brain development, etc. The identification of biological roles of TET proteins will open a new field in epigenetic research, and these studies on TET proteins are of great significance to life science research. Here, we review TET proteins from their structure, molecular mechanisms of DNA demethylation and function in the regulation of mouse development, which may provide the basis for understanding the functions of TET proteins.

Key words: TET proteins, demethylation, epigenetics, mouse development

贾振伟, 高树新, 张永春, 张显华. TET蛋白的去甲基化机制及其在调控小鼠发育过程中的作用[J]. 遗传, 2015, 37(1): 34-40.

Zhenwei Jia, Shuxin Gao, Yongchun Zhang, Xianhua Zhang. Mechanisms of TET protein-mediated DNA demethylation and its role in the regulation of mouse development[J]. HEREDITAS(Beijing), 2015, 37(1): 34-40.

参考文献

[1] Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, Agarwal S, Iyer LM, Liu DR, Aravind L, Rao A. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science , 2009, 324(5929): 930-935.
[2] Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, Wu SC, Collins LB, Swenberg JA, He C, Zhang Y. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science , 2011, 333(6047): 1300-1303.
[3] Ito S, D’Alessio AC, Taranova OV, Hong K, Sowers LC, Zhang Y. Role of Tet proteins in 5 mC to 5 hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature , 2010, 466(7310): 1129-1133.
[4] Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S, Santos F, Krueger F, Hore TA, Marques CJ, Andrews S, Reik W. Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature , 2011, 473(7347): 398-402.
[5] Moran-Crusio K, Reavie L, Shih A, Abdel-Wahab O, Ndiaye-Lobry D, Lobry C, Figueroa ME, Vasanthakumar A, Patel J, Zhao XY, Perna F, Pandey S, Madzo J, Song CX, Dai Q, He C, Ibrahim S, Beran M, Zavadil J, Nimer SD, Melnick A, Godley LA, Aifantis I, Levine RL. Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation. Cancer Cell , 2011, 20(1): 11-24.
[6] Wu H, D'Alessio AC, Ito S, Xia K, Wang ZB, Cui KR, Zhao KJ, Sun YE, Zhang Y. Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature , 2011, 473(7347): 389-393.
[7] Yamaguchi S, Hong K, Liu R, Shen L, Inoue A, Diep D, Zhang K, Zhang Y. Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature , 2012, 492(7429): 443- 447.
[8] Xu YF, Wu FZ, Tan L, Kong LC, Xiong LJ, Deng J, Barbera AJ, Zheng LJ, Zhang HK, Huang S, Min JR, Nicholson T, Chen TP, Xu GL, Shi Y, Zhang K, Shi YG. Genome-wide regulation of 5 hmC, 5 mC, and gene expression by Tet1 hydroxylase in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell , 2011, 42(4): 451-464.
[9] Xu YF, Xu C, Kato A, Tempel W, Abreu JG, Bian CB, Hu YG, Hu D, Zhao B, Cerovina T, Diao JB, Wu FZ, He HH, Cui QC, Clark E, Ma C, Barbara A, Veenstra GJC, Xu GL, Kaiser UB, Liu XS, Sugrue SP, He X, Min JR, Kato Y, Shi YG. Tet3 CXXC domain and dioxygenase activity cooperatively regulate key genes for Xenopus eye and neural development. Cell , 2012, 151(6): 1200-1213.
[10] Ko M, An J, Bandukwala HS, Chavez L, Äijö T, Pastor WA, Segal MF, Li HM, Koh KP, Lähdesmäki H, Hogan PG, Aravind L, Rao A. Modulation of TET2 expression and 5-methylcytosine oxidation by the CXXC domain protein IDAX. Nature , 2013, 497(7447): 122-126.
[11] Guo JU, Su YJ, Zhong C, Ming GL, Song HJ. Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell , 2011, 145(3): 423-434.
[12] He YF, Li BZ, Li Z, Liu P, Wang Y, Tang QY, Ding JP, Jia YY, Chen ZC, Li L, Sun Y, Li XX, Dai Q, Song CX, Zhang KL, He C, Xu GL. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science , 2011, 333(6047): 1303-1307.
[13] Zhang L, Lu XY, Lu JY, Liang HH, Dai Q, Xu GL, Luo C, Jiang HL, He C. Thymine DNA glycosylase specifically recognizes 5-carboxylcytosine-modified DNA. Nat Chem Biol , 2012, 8(4): 328-330.
[14] Valinluck V, Tsai HH, Rogstad DK, Burdzy A, Bird A, Sowers LC. Oxidative damage to methyl-CpG sequences inhibits the binding of the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Nucleic Acids Res , 2004, 32(14): 4100-4108.
[15] Valinluck V, Sowers LC. Endogenous cytosine damage products alter the site selectivity of human DNA maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1. Cancer Res , 2007, 67(3): 946-950.
[16] Inoue A, Zhang Y. Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos. Science , 2011, 334(6053): 194.
[17] Blaschke K, Ebata KT, Karimi MM, Zepeda-Martínez JA, Goyal P, Mahapatra S, Tam A, Laird DJ,

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

TET蛋白的去甲基化机制及其在调控小鼠发育过程中的作用

Mechanisms of TET protein-mediated DNA demethylation and its role in the regulation of mouse development

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵岩, 王晨鑫, 杨天明, 李春爽, 张丽宏, 杜冬妮, 王若曦, 王静, 魏民, 巴雪青. DNA氧化损伤8-羟鸟嘌呤与肿瘤的发生发展[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(6): 466-477.
[2]	曲卉, 柳毅, 陈雅文, 汪晖. 环境因素所致印迹基因改变与子代器官发育[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(2): 107-116.
[3]	张杨景晖, 常沛瑶, 杨紫淑, 薛宇航, 李雪奇, 张旸. 表观遗传修饰影响花青苷合成研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(12): 1117-1127.
[4]	赵清雯, 潘东宁. 表观遗传修饰对脂肪组织产热的调控进展[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(10): 867-880.
[5]	杨卓瑾, 张玉向, 杨茜茜, 高菲菲, 杨婧思, 阎春霞. 组蛋白去甲基化酶KDM7家族在脑疾病中研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(1): 25-35.
[6]	何江平, 陈捷凯. 转座元件、表观遗传调控与细胞命运决定[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(9): 822-834.
[7]	王雅楠, 徐涛, 王万鹏, 张庆祝, 解莉楠. 表观遗传修饰在作物重要性状形成中的作用[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(9): 858-879.
[8]	袁洁, 蔡时青. 衰老过程中行为和认知功能退化的调控机制研究[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(6): 545-570.
[9]	王天一, 王应祥, 尤辰江. 植物PHD结构域蛋白的结构与功能特性[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(4): 323-339.
[10]	朱文静, 刘志玮. MDMPR：小鼠发育代谢表型库[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(4): 375-384.
[11]	张向前, 李楠, 解新明. 表观遗传学综合性实验设计与探讨[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(12): 1179-1187.
[12]	胡颖楚, 胡豪畅, 林少沂, 陈晓敏. DNA羟甲基化调控动脉粥样硬化的研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2020, 42(7): 632-640.
[13]	吴杰, 全建平, 叶勇, 吴珍芳, 杨杰, 杨明, 郑恩琴. 染色质转座酶可及性测序研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2020, 42(4): 333-346.
[14]	梅志超, 位竹君, 于佳慧, 冀凤丹, 解莉楠. 多组学关联分析揭示表观等位基因在拟南芥环境适应性进化中的作用及机制[J]. 遗传, 2020, 42(3): 321-331.
[15]	陈会友, 张建敏, 李柏森, 邓永琳, 张龚炜. 犏牛雄性不育的减数分裂基因表达与表观遗传调控研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2020, 42(11): 1081-1092.