杂种偏分离的遗传和分子机理研究进展

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.14-217

遗传 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 148-156.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.14-217

杂种偏分离的遗传和分子机理研究进展

范智权,孙加雷,单建伟,杨江义

广西大学生命科学与技术学院,亚热带农业生物资源保护与利用国家重点实验室,南宁 530004

收稿日期:2014-07-02 出版日期:2015-02-20 发布日期:2015-01-19
通讯作者: 杨江义,博士,教授,研究方向：植物分子生物学。E-mail: yangjy598@163.com
作者简介:范智权,硕士研究生,专业方向：遗传学。E-mail: fanzhiquan123@mail.gxu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(编号：31471476)资助

Research progress on genetic and molecular mechanisms of hybrid segregation distortion

Zhiquan Fan,Jialei Sun,Jianwei Shan,Jiangyi Yang

State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

Received:2014-07-02 Online:2015-02-20 Published:2015-01-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 杂种偏分离是指杂交后代群体在某个位点的基因型分离比偏离了预期的孟德尔分离比例的一种现象,是来自不同杂交亲本基因之间的不兼容性所致。功能缺失型和功能获得型的基因间互作都可以导致杂种偏分离,其中前者的机理比较简单,即缺陷型的基因组合导致原有功能丧失而造成细胞死亡。功能获得型杂种偏分离系统是由多基因控制的遗传系统,包含两个基本成分：杀手(killer)因子和护卫(protector)因子,此外还有增强子(enhancer)、抑制基因(repressor)等修饰因子。功能获得型杂种偏分离有通用的遗传模型：具有传递优势的单倍型含有高活性的killer+和protector+;传递劣势的单倍型含有低活性的killer-和protector-;中性的单倍型(广亲和型)则含有killer-和protector+。该系统通过killer和protector间的紧密连锁、修饰因子的积累等途径得以在自然选择中保存下来。尽管不同功能获得型杂种偏分离系统的遗传机理有较高的相似性,但分子机制则大相径庭。文章综述了杂种偏分离的遗传和分子机理以及其与杂种不育的关系,以期为后续杂种偏分离研究提供参考。

关键词: 偏分离, 基因互作, 广亲和, 生殖隔离, 杂种不育

Abstract: Segregation distortion (SD) is defined as abnormal segregation ratio of hybrid offsprings at some genetic loci deviating from the Mendelian ratio. SD results from the incompatibility among genes from different parents, which could be due to loss-of-function or gain-of-function gene interactions. The mechanism for loss-of-function SD is relatively simple: defective gene combination leads to loss of the original function and eventual cell death. The gain-of-function hybrid SD system is a multi-gene genetic system, comprising two basic components: the killer and the protector. Additional modifiers, such as enhancers and repressors, are also involved. There is a general genetic model for gain-of-function hybrid SD: haplotypes with transmission advantage possess high-activity killer+ and protector+; those with transmission disadvantage possess low-activity killer- and protector-; neutral haplotypes (wide compatibility types) possess killer- and protector+. Depending upon close linkage between the killer and the protector and the accumulation of modifiers, the SD system survived through natural selection. Although the genetic mechanisms are highly similar, different gain-of-function hybrid SD systems have distinctive molecular mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the genetic and molecular mechanisms of hybrid SD, and the relationship between hybrid SD and hybrid sterility.

Key words: segregation distortion, gene interaction, wide compatibility, reproductive isolation, hybrid sterility

范智权,孙加雷,单建伟,杨江义. 杂种偏分离的遗传和分子机理研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2015, 37(2): 148-156.

Zhiquan Fan,Jialei Sun,Jianwei Shan,Jiangyi Yang. Research progress on genetic and molecular mechanisms of hybrid segregation distortion[J]. HEREDITAS(Beijing), 2015, 37(2): 148-156.

参考文献

[1] Lyttle TW. Segregation distorters. Annu Rev Genet , 1991, 25: 511-557.
[2] Charlesworth B. Driving genes and chromosomes. Nature , 1988, 332(6163): 394-395.
[3] 宋宪亮, 孙学振, 张天真. 偏分离及对植物遗传作图的影响. 农业生物技术学报, 2006, 14(2): 286-292.
[4] Vogl C, Xu SZ. Multipoint mapping of viability and segregation distorting loci using molecular markers. Genetics , 2000, 155(3): 1439-1447.
[5] Kusano A, Staber C, Chan HYE, Ganetzky B. Closing the (Ran)GAP on segregation distortion in Drosophila . BioEssays , 2003, 25(2): 108-115.
[6] Bauer H, Willertbirgit J, Koschorz B. The t complex-encoded GTPase-activating protein Tagap1 acts as a transmission ratio distorter in mice. Nat Genet , 2005, 37(9): 969-973.
[7] Yang JY, Zhao XB, Cheng K, Du HY, Ouyang YD, Chen JJ, Qiu SQ, Huang JY, Jiang YH, Jiang LW, Ding JH, Wang J, Xu CG, Li XH, Zhang QF. A killer-protector system regulates both hybrid sterility and segregation distortion in rice. Science , 2012, 337(6100): 1336-1340.
[8] Burt A, Trivers R. Genes in conflict: the biology of selfish genetic elements. London: Belknap Press, 2006.
[9] Whitkus R. Genetics of adaptive radiation in Hawaiian and Cook Islands species of Tetramolopium (Asteraceae). Ⅱ. Genetic linkage map and its implications for interspecific breeding barriers. Genetics , 1998, 150(3): 1209-1216.
[10] Lin SY, Ikehashi H, Yanagihara S, Kawashima A. Segregation distortion via male gametes in hybrids between Indica and Japonica or wide-compatibility varieties of rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet , 1992, 84(7-8): 812-818.
[11] Xu X, Li L, Dong X, Jin W, Melchinger AE, Chen S. Gametophytic and zygotic selection leads to segregation distortion through in vivo induction of a maternal haploid in maize. J Exp Bot., 2013, 64(4): 1083-1096.
[12] Kianian SF, Quiros CF. Generation of a Brassica oleracea composite RFLP map: linkage arrangements among various populations and evolutionary implications. Theor Appl Genet , 1992, 84(5-6): 544-554.
[13] Lyon MF. Transmission ratio distortion in mice. Annu Rev Genet , 2003, 37: 393-408.
[14] Harushima Y, Kurata N, Yano M, Naganmura Y, Sasaki T, Minobe Y, Nakagahra M. Detection of segregation distortions in an indica-japonica rice cross using a high-resolution molecular map. Theor Appl Genet , 1996, 92(2): 145- 150.
[15] Yamagata Y, Yamamoto E, Aya K, Win K, Doi K, Sobrizal, Ito T, Kanamori H, Wu J, Matsumoto T, Matsuoka M, Ashikari M, Yoshimura A. Mitochondrial gene in the nuclear genome induces reproductive barrier in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2010, 107(4): 1494-1499.
[16] Mizuta Y, Harushima Y, Kurata N. Rice pollen hybrid incompatibility caused by reciprocal gene loss of duplicated genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2010, 107(47): 20417- 20422.
[17] Flachs P, Mihola O, Šimeček P, Gregorová S, Schimenti JC, Matsui Y, Baudat F, de Massy B, Piálek J, Forejt J, Trachtulec Z. Interallelic and intergenic incompatibilities of the Prdm9 (Hst1 ) gene in mouse hybrid sterility. PLoS Genetics , 2012, 8(11): e1003044.
[18] Long YM, Zhao LF, Niu BX, Su J, Wu H, Chen YL, Zhang QY, Guo JX, Zhuang CX, Mei MT, Xia JX, Wang L, Wu HB, Liu YG. Hybrid male sterility in rice controlled by interaction between divergent alleles of two adjacent genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2008, 105(48): 18871-18876.
[19] Pimpinelli S, Dimitri P. Cytogenetic analysis of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster : the cytological organization of the responder ( Rsp ) locus. Genetics , 1989, 121(4): 765-772.
[20] Presgraves DC. Does genetic conflict drive rapid molecular evolution of nuclear transport genes in Drosophila ? BioEssays , 2007, 29(4): 386-391.
[21] Merrill C, Bayraktaroglu L, Kusano A, Ganatzky B. Truncated RanGAP encoded by the Segregation distorter locus of Drosophila . Science , 1999, 283(5408): 1742-1745.
[22] Kusano A, Staber C, Ganetzky B. Nuclear mislocalization of enzymatically active R

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

杂种偏分离的遗传和分子机理研究进展

Research progress on genetic and molecular mechanisms of hybrid segregation distortion

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	谢勇尧,汤金涛,杨博文,胡骏,刘耀光,陈乐天. 水稻育性调控的分子遗传研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(8): 703-715.
[2]	王哲. 植物杂交后代中基因偏分离的产生原因及其进化意义[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(9): 801-810.
[3]	刘亚兰, 张华, 冯永. 神经嵴发育异常导致综合征型耳聋的机制[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(11): 1131-1144.
[4]	栾奕昭左晓宇刘轲李谷饶绍奇. 基于单核苷酸多态性的基因互作分析方法学进展[J]. 遗传, 2013, 35(12): 1331-1339.
[5]	户国，王守志，张森，陈维星，刘爽，田建伟，李辉. ApoB与UCP基因间上位效应对鸡腹脂性状影响的遗传学分析[J]. 遗传, 2010, 32(1): 59-66.
[6]	梁永书，彭勇，叶少平，李平，孙林静，马忠友，李艳萍. 水稻籼粳交F2、F6群体遗传连锁图谱的比较分析[J]. 遗传, 2007, 29(9): 1110-1120.
[7]	黄伟素，郑燕，陈国波，吴为人. 互作基因定位方法的研究和计算机软件的开发[J]. 遗传, 2006, 28(10): 1306-1310.
[8]	王庆钰，朱立宏，盖钧镒，王建康. 水稻广亲和性遗传的主基因一多基因混合模型分析[J]. 遗传, 2004, 26(6): 898-902.
[9]	谭军，薛庆中. 偏分离分子标记的作图方法[J]. 遗传, 2004, 26(3): 0-386.
[10]	庞有志，宋东亮，陈家友，徐恒玉，邓雯，任洪涛，王建春，毛森林，王树才，孙玉贵. 蛋用鹌鹑伴性羽色基因互作与连锁的关系[J]. 遗传, 2001, 23(4): 309-316.
[11]	梁国华，顾铭洪. 浅议水稻亚种间杂种不育性的遗传基础[J]. 遗传, 2001, 23(2): 177-282.
[12]	赵兴波，李宁，吴常信. 动物线粒体核质基因互作的研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2001, 23(1): 81-85.
[13]	胡洪凯，王朝斌，韩文奎，石艳华. 是“基因互作”，还是“复等位”？— 兼与马尚耀先生讨论[J]. 遗传, 1991, 13(5): 34-36.
[14]	余文金，刘国平，郭学兴. 水稻广亲和性的醋酶同工酶特征及其遗传初探[J]. 遗传, 1991, 13(4): 5-8.