两种密码子优化的Cas9编码基因在斑马鱼胚胎中基因敲除效率的比较

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.15-452

遗传 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 144-154.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.15-452

两种密码子优化的Cas9编码基因在斑马鱼胚胎中基因敲除效率的比较

张峰华,王厚鹏,黄思雨,熊凤,朱作言,孙永华

中国科学院水生生物研究所,淡水生态与生物技术国家重点实验室,武汉 430072

收稿日期:2015-11-04 修回日期:2015-12-28 出版日期:2016-02-20 发布日期:2016-01-26
通讯作者: 孙永华,博士,研究员,研究方向：鱼类发育与生物技术。E-mail: yhsun@ihb.ac.cn
作者简介:张峰华,硕士生,专业方向：鱼类发育与生物技术。E-mail: zfh0606@gmail.com
基金资助:
国家重大科学研究计划项目(编号：2012CB944504),中国科学院重点部署项目(编号：KSZD-EW-Z-001)和国家自然科学基金项目(编号：31222052)资助[Supported by the Major National Scientific Research Projects (No; 2012CB944504), the Key Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No; KSZD-EW-Z-001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No; 31222052)]

A comparison of the knockout efficiencies of two codon-optimized Cas9 coding sequences in zebrafish embryos

Fenghua Zhang, Houpeng Wang, Siyu Huang, Feng Xiong, Zuoyan Zhu, Yonghua Sun

State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2015-11-04 Revised:2015-12-28 Online:2016-02-20 Published:2016-01-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为在斑马鱼中获得特异且高效的基因敲除,多个实验室独立人工合成了序列彼此不一的Cas9 cDNA序列,并克隆入不同的体外转录载体。本文选取两种斑马鱼密码子优化的Cas9编码序列(zCas9_bz和zCas9_wc),对斑马鱼胚胎中的7个基因(外源egfp及内源chd、hbegfa、th、eef1a1b、tyr、tcf7l1a)分别进行敲除,通过PCR产物测序、克隆测序和表型分析比较了两种Cas9的敲除效率。结果发现,zCas9_wc在各种情况下都显现出较高的敲除效率,而zCas9_bz的效率相对较低。

关键词: CRISPR/Cas9, 斑马鱼, 基因敲除, 突变效率

Abstract: Recent years have witnessed the rapid development of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein(CRISPR/Cas9)system. In order to realize gene knockout with high efficiency and specificity in zebrafish, several labs have synthesized distinct Cas9 cDNA sequences which were cloned into different vectors. In this study, we chose two commonly used zebrafish-codon-optimized Cas9 coding sequences (zCas9_bz, zCas9_wc) from two different labs, and utilized them to knockout seven genes in zebrafish embryos, including the exogenous egfp and six endogenous genes (chd, hbegfa, th, eef1a1b, tyr and tcf7l1a). We compared the knockout efficiencies resulting from the two zCas9 coding sequences, by direct sequencing of PCR products, colony sequencing and phenotypic analysis. The results showed that the knockout efficiency of zCas9_wc was higher than that of zCas9_bz in all conditions.

Key words: CRISPR/Cas9, zebrafish, gene knockout, mutation efficiency

张峰华,王厚鹏,黄思雨,熊凤,朱作言,孙永华. 两种密码子优化的Cas9编码基因在斑马鱼胚胎中基因敲除效率的比较[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(2): 144-154.

Fenghua Zhang, Houpeng Wang, Siyu Huang, Feng Xiong, Zuoyan Zhu, Yonghua Sun. A comparison of the knockout efficiencies of two codon-optimized Cas9 coding sequences in zebrafish embryos[J]. HEREDITAS(Beijing), 2016, 38(2): 144-154.

参考文献

[1] Shen B, Zhang J, Wu HY, Wang JY, Ma K, Li Z, Zhang XG, Zhang PM, Huang XX. Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting. Cell Res , 2013, 23(5): 720-723.
[2] Bassett AR, Tibbit C, Ponting CP, Liu JL. Highly efficient targeted mutagenesis of Drosophila with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Rep , 2013, 4(1): 220-228.
[3] Hwang WY, Fu YF, Reyon D, Maeder ML, Tsai SQ, Sander JD, Peterson RT, Yeh JRJ, Joung JK. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol , 2013, 31(3): 227-229.
[4] Chang NN, Sun CH, Gao L, Zhu D, Xu XF, Zhu XJ, Xiong JW, Xi JJ. Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos. Cell Res , 2013, 23(4): 465-472.
[5] Tzur YB, Friedland AE, Nadarajan S, Church GM, Calarco JA, Colaiácovo MP. Heritable custom genomic modifications in Caenorhabditis elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Genetics , 2013, 195(3): 1181-1185.
[6] Fauser F, Schiml S, Puchta H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant J , 2014, 79(2): 348-359.
[7] Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero DA, Horvath P. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes . Science , 2007, 315(5819): 1709-1712.
[8] Cong L, Ann Ran F, Cox D, Lin SL, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu XB, Jiang WY, Marraffini LA, Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science , 2013, 339(6121): 819-823.
[9] Auer TO, Duroure K, De Cian A, Concordet JP, Del Bene F. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res , 2014, 24(1): 142-153.
[10] Kimura Y, Hisano Y, Kawahara A, Higashijima S. Efficient generation of knock-in transgenic zebrafish carrying reporter/driver genes by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. Sci Rep , 2014, 4: 6545.
[11] Li J, Zhang BB, Ren YG, Gu SY, Xiang YH, Huang C, Du JL. Intron targeting-mediated and endogenous gene integrity- maintaining knockin in zebrafish using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Res , 2015, 25(5): 634-637.
[12] Jao LE, Wente SR, Chen WB. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2013, 110(34): 13904-13909.
[13] Hisano Y, Sakuma T, Nakade S, Ohga R, Ota S, Okamoto H, Yamamoto T, Kawahara A. Precise in-frame integration of exogenous DNA mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish. Sci Rep , 2015, 5: 8841.
[14] Liu D, Wang ZX, Xiao A, Zhang YT, Li WY, Zu Y, Yao SH, Lin S, Zhang B. Efficient gene targeting in zebrafish mediated by a zebrafish-codon-optimized cas9 and evaluation of off-targeting effect. J Genet Genomics , 2014, 41(1): 43-46.
[15] Shah AN, Davey CF, Whitebirch AC, Miller AC, Moens CB. Rapid reverse genetic screening using CRISPR in zebrafish. Nat Methods , 2015, 12(6): 535-540.
[16] Dong ZJ, Dong XH, Jia WS, Cao SS, Zhao QS. Improving the efficiency for generation of genome-edited zebrafish by labeling primordial germ cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol , 2014, 55: 329-334.
[17] Jin SW, Beis D, Mitchell T, Chen JN, Stainier DYR. Cellular and molecular analyses of vascular tube and lumen formation in zebrafish. Development , 2005, 132(23): 5199-5209.
[18] Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn , 1995, 203(3): 253-310.
[19] Schulte-Merker S, Lee KJ, McMahon AP, Hammerschmidt M. The zebrafish organizer requires chordino . Nature , 1997, 387(6636): 862-863.
[20] Cavener DR. Comparison of the consensus sequence flanking translational start sites in Drosophila and vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res , 1987, 15(4): 1353-1361.
[21] Efthymiadis A, Shao HM, Hübne+Y42r S, Jans DA. Kinetic characterization of the human retinoblastoma protein bipartite nuclear localization sequence (NLS) in vivo and in vitro - A comparison with the SV40 large T-antigen NLS. J Biol Chem , 1997, 272(35): 22134-22139.
[22] Dingwall C, Robbins J, Dilworth SM, Roberts B, Richardson WD. The Nucleoplasmin nuclear location sequence is larger and more complex than that of SV-40 large T antigen. J Cell Biology , 1988, 107(3): 841-849.
[23] Terpe K. Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol , 2003, 60(5): 523-533.
[24] Doyon Y, McCammon JM, Miller JC, Faraji F, Ngo C, Katibah GE, Amora R, Hocking TD, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Amacher SL. Heritable targeted gene disruption in zebrafish using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol , 2008, 26(6): 702-708.
[25] Sander JD, Cade L, Khayter C, Reyon D, Peterson RT, Joung JK, Yeh JRJ. Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENs. Nat Biotechnol , 2011, 29(8): 697-698.
[26] Ciruna B, Weidinger G, Knaut H, Thisse B, Thisse C, Raz E, Schier AF. Production of maternal-zygotic mutant zebrafish by germ-line replacement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2002, 99(23): 14919-14924.
[27] Ann Ran F, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ, Zetsche B, Shalem O, Wu XB, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Sharp PA, Zhang F. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature , 2015, 520(7546): 186-191.
[28] Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Topkar VV, Nguyen NT, Zheng ZL, Gonzales APW, Li ZY, Peterson RT, Yeh JRJ, Aryee MJ, Joung JK. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature , 2015, 523(7561): 481-485.

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

两种密码子优化的Cas9编码基因在斑马鱼胚胎中基因敲除效率的比较

A comparison of the knockout efficiencies of two codon-optimized Cas9 coding sequences in zebrafish embryos

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郑晓飞,黄海燕,吴强. 染色质架构蛋白CTCF调控UGT1基因簇的表达[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(6): 509-523.
[2]	王珏, 黄娟, 许蕊. 利用CRISPR/Cas9和piggyBac实现果蝇基因组无缝编辑[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(5): 422-429.
[3]	张楷, 刘蔚, 刘小凤, 陈瑶生, 刘小红, 何祖勇. 利用CRISPR/Cas9系统构建人HPRT1基因定点突变细胞株[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(10): 939-949.
[4]	刘恒, 李东明, 朱兰玉, 赖乐锦, 闫婉云, 陆玉双, 韦伊, 黄月琪, 方媚, 苏元港, 杨芳, 舒伟. 利用CRISPR/Cas9敲除人源细胞系中LMNA基因的研究[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(1): 66-75.
[5]	任云晓, 肖茹丹, 娄晓敏, 方向东. 基因编辑技术及其在基因治疗中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(1): 18-27.
[6]	张桂珊, 杨勇, 张灵敏, 戴宪华. 机器学习方法在CRISPR/Cas9系统中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(9): 704-723.
[7]	熊凤,谢训卫,潘鲁媛,李阔宇,柳力月,张昀,李玲璐,孙永华. 国家斑马鱼资源中心的资源、技术和服务建设[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(8): 683-692.
[8]	刘海龙, 谌阳, 高杨, 周玲, 韩晓松, 赵长志, 杨高娟, 陈毅龙, 杨慧, 谢胜松. 靶向miRNA前体不同类型sgRNA的丰度及特异性评估[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(7): 561-571.
[9]	唐浚博, 曹浩伟, 许蕊, 张丹丹, 黄娟. 果蝇睾丸基因敲除突变体的构建及表型分析[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(6): 478-487.
[10]	李慧卿, 陈超, 陈冉冉, 宋雪薇, 李佶娜, 朱延明, 丁晓东. 利用CRISPR/Cas9双基因敲除系统初步解析大豆GmSnRK1.1和GmSnRK1.2对ABA及碱胁迫的响应[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(6): 496-507.
[11]	童晓玲,方春燕,盖停停,石津,鲁成,代方银. CRISPR/Cas9系统在昆虫中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(4): 266-278.
[12]	谢晶, 范辰, 张景龙, 张仕强. Ash2l-1/Ash2l-2在小鼠胚胎干细胞中的表达特异性及互补效应[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(3): 237-249.
[13]	辛高伟, 胡熙璕, 王克剑, 王兴春. Cas9蛋白变体VQR高效识别水稻NGAC前间区序列邻近基序[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(12): 1112-1119.
[14]	刘旭, 张平, 张晓枫, 李兴, 白宇, 贾克荣, 郭晓东, 张豪, 马晓燕, 仓明, 刘东军, 郭旭东. 利用CRISPR/Cas9系统构建FGF21基因敲除小鼠模型[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(1): 66-74.
[15]	李红花,刘钢. CRISPR/Cas9在丝状真菌基因组编辑中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(5): 355-367.