家畜基因组选择研究进展

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.16-342

遗传 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 377-387.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.16-342

家畜基因组选择研究进展

李宏伟(),王瑞军(),王志英,李学武,王振宇,张燕军,苏蕊,刘志红,李金泉()

内蒙古农业大学动物科学学院,动物遗传育种与繁殖重点实验室,呼和浩特 010018

收稿日期:2016-10-17 修回日期:2017-01-15 出版日期:2017-03-20 发布日期:2017-12-25
作者简介:李宏伟,硕士研究生,专业方向：动物遗传育种与繁殖,E-mail: godlovelhw@163.com|王瑞军,博士,助理研究员,研究方向：绒山羊遗传育种。E-mail: nmgwrj@126.com|李金泉,博士,教授,研究方向：绒山羊遗传育种。E-mail: lijinquan_nd@126.com
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目(863计划)(2013AA102506);内蒙古自治区科技计划项目,国家自然科学基金项目(31560619,31660639);内蒙古自然科学基金重点项目(2016ZD02);国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303059);国家农业部现代农业产业技术体系项目(CARS-40-05)

The research progress of genomic selection in livestock

Li Hongwei(),Wang Ruijun(),Wang Zhiying,Li Xuewu,Wang Zhenyu,Zhang Yanjun,Su Rui,Liu Zhihong,Li Jinquan()

Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 0 10018, China

Received:2016-10-17 Revised:2017-01-15 Online:2017-03-20 Published:2017-12-25
Supported by:
the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China(2013AA102506);the Program of Science and Technology Plan of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31560619,31660639);the Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia of China(2016ZD02);National Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest(201303059);the Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System of Ministry of Agriculture of China(CARS-40-05)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来,随着基因芯片技术的发展与育种技术的进步,动植物的基因组选择成为研究热点。在家畜育种中,基因组选择凭借其准确性高、世代间隔短和育种成本低等优势被应用于各种经济动物的种畜选择中。本文详细介绍了基因分型技术和基因组育种值估计方法(最小二乘法、RR-BLUP法、GBLUP法、ssGBLUP法、贝叶斯A法、贝叶斯B法等),并对这些育种方法选用的标记范围、准确性以及计算速度进行了比较,总结了我国和其他国家基因组选择在种畜选择中的应用情况及存在的问题,展望了目前国内外在基因组选择上的最新研究动态及进展,以期为其他育种工作者进一步了解基因组选择提供参考。

关键词: 基因组选择, 基因分型技术, 基因组育种值估计方法

Abstract:

With the development of gene chip and breeding technology, genomic selection in plants and animals has become research hotspots in recent years. Genomic selection has been extensively applied to all kinds of economic livestock, due to its high accuracy, short generation intervals and low breeding costs. In this review, we summarize genotyping technology and the methods for genomic breeding value estimation, the latter including the least square method, RR-BLUP, GBLUP, ssGBLUP, BayesA and BayesB. We also cover basic principles of genomic selection and compare their genetic marker ranges, genomic selection accuracy and operational speed. In addition, we list common indicators, methods and influencing factors that are related to genomic selection accuracy. Lastly, we discuss latest applications and the current problems of genomic selection at home and abroad. Importantly, we envision future status of genomic selection research, including multi-trait and multi-population genomic selection, as well as impact of whole genome sequencing and dominant effects on genomic selection. This review will provide some venues for other breeders to further understand genome selection.

Key words: genomic selection, genotyping technology, the methods of genomic breeding value estimation

李宏伟,王瑞军,王志英,李学武,王振宇,张燕军,苏蕊,刘志红,李金泉. 家畜基因组选择研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(5): 377-387.

Li Hongwei,Wang Ruijun,Wang Zhiying,Li Xuewu,Wang Zhenyu,Zhang Yanjun,Su Rui,Liu Zhihong,Li Jinquan. The research progress of genomic selection in livestock[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2017, 39(5): 377-387.

参考文献

[1]	Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci, 2009, 49(1): 1-12.
[2]	Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 2001, 157(4): 1819-1829.
[3]	Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet, 1980, 32(3): 314-331.
[4]	Wang JL. Study on the methods of genomic selection for meat sheep by simulation[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2014.
[4]	王景霖. 肉用绵羊基因组选择方法的模拟研究[学位论文]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2014.
[5]	Henderson CR. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics, 1975, 31(2): 423-447.
[6]	VanRaden PM. Efficient Methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci, 2008, 91(11): 4414-4423.
[7]	Zhu M. Application of genomic selection on carcass and meat quality traits in simmental cattle[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013.
[7]	朱淼. 西门塔尔牛部分屠宰和肉质性状基因组选择初步研究[学位论文]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
[8]	Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92(9): 4648-4655.
[9]	Christensen OF, Lund MS. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genet Sel Evol, 2010, 42: 2.
[10]	Whittaker JC, Thompson R, Denham MC. Marker-assisted selection using ridge regression. Genet Res, 2000, 75(2): 249-252.
[11]	Gianola D, de los Campos G, Hill WG, Manfredi E, Fernando R. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics, 2009, 183(1): 347-363.
[12]	Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10(6): 381-391.
[13]	Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res, 2009, 91(1): 47-60.
[14]	Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics, 2011, 12: 186.
[15]	VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS. Invited Review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92(1): 16-24.
[16]	Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, de Roos APW, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics, 2008, 178(1): 553-561.
[17]	Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, Windig JJ, Knol EF, Schrooten C, Vereijken ALJ, Veerkamp RF. Effects of the number of markers per haplotype and clustering of haplotypes on the accuracy of QTL mapping and prediction of genomic breeding values. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 11.
[18]	Rolf MM, Taylor JF, Schnabel RD, Mckay SD, Mcclure MC, Northcutt SL, Kerley MS, Weaber RL. Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle. BMC Genet, 2010, 11: 24.
[19]	Wu XP. GWAS and genomic prediction based on markers of SNP-Chips and sequence data in dairy cattle populations[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2014.
[19]	吴晓平. 基于SNP芯片和全测序数据的奶牛全基因组关联分析和基因组选择研究[学位论文]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2014.
[20]	Gao H, Su G, Janss L, Zhang Y, Lund MS. Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population. J Dairy Sci, 2013, 96(7): 4678-4687.
[21]	Su G, Br?ndum RF, Ma P, Guldbrandtsen B, Aamand GP, Lund MS. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (～54, 000) and high-density (～777, 000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations. J Dairy Sci, 2012, 95(8): 4657-4665.
[22]	Jonas E, de Koning DJ. Genomic selection needs to be carefully assessed to meet specific requirements in livestock breeding programs. Front Genet, 2015, 6: 49.
[23]	Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 37.
[24]	Sun W, Ibrahim JG, Zou F. Genomewide Multiple-Loci Mapping in experimental crosses by iterative adaptive penalized regression. Genetics, 2010, 185(1): 349-359.
[25]	Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics, 2007, 177(4): 2389-2397.
[26]	Dong LS. Genomic selection by pre-selection of markers[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2012.
[26]	董林松. 通过预选标记法进行基因组选择[学位论文]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2012.
[27]	Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Verbyla K, Goddard ME. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 51.
[28]	Lorenz AJ, Smith KP, Jannink JL. Potential and optimization of genomic selection for fusarium head blight resistance in six-row barley. Crop Sci, 2012, 52(4): 1609-1621.
[29]	Peippo J, Viitala S, Virta J, R?ty M, Tammiranta N, Lamminen T, Aro J, Myllym?ki H, Vilkki J. Birth of correctly genotyped calves after multiplex marker detection from bovine embryo microblade biopsies. Mol Reprod Dev, 2007, 74(11): 1373-1378.
[30]	Nielsen HM, Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes. J Anim Sci, 2011, 89(3): 630-638.
[31]	Schaeffer LR. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet, 2006, 123(4): 218-223.
[32]	Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92(2): 433-443.
[33]	Lillehammer M, Meuwissen THE, Sonesson AK. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection. J Dairy Sci, 2011, 94(1): 493-500.
[34]	Pryce JE, Goddard ME, Raadsma HW, Hayes BJ. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. J Dairy Sci, 2010, 93(11): 5455-5466.
[35]	Lillehammer M, Meuwissen THE, Sonesson AK. Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs. J Anim Sci, 2011, 89(12): 3908-3916.
[36]	Avenda?o S, Watson KA, Kranis A. Genomics in poultry breeding-from utopias to deliverables. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Leipzig, Germany, 2010.
[37]	Guo G, Zhao FP, Wang YC, Zhang Y, Du LX, Su GS. Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models. BMC Genet, 2014, 15: 30.
[38]	Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods. Genet Sel Evol, 2011, 43: 26.
[39]	MacLeod IM, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Villalobos NL. Will sequence SNP data improve the accuracy of genomic prediction in the presence of long term selection. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics. Napier, New Zealand, 2013: 215-219.
[40]	Clark SA, Hickey JM, van der Werf JHJ. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol, 2011, 43: 18.
[41]	Ueki M, Tamiya G. Smooth-Threshold Multivariate Genetic prediction with unbiased model selection. Genet Epidemiol, 2016, 40(3): 233-243.
[42]	Toro MA, Varona L. A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol, 2010, 42: 33.
[43]	Menke DB. Engineering subtle targeted mutations into the mouse genome. Genesis, 2013, 51(9): 605-618.
[44]	Jenko J, Gorjanc G, Cleveland MA, Varshney RK, Whitelaw CBA, Woolliams JA, Hickey JM. Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs. Genet Sel Evol, 2015, 47: 55.

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

家畜基因组选择研究进展

The research progress of genomic selection in livestock

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	何俊,Fernando B. Lopes,吴晓林. 动物基因组选配方法与应用[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(6): 486-493.
[2]	赵志达,张莉. 基因组选择在绵羊育种中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(4): 293-303.
[3]	王凤红,张磊,李晓凯,范一星,乔贤,龚高,严晓春,张令天,王志英,王瑞军,刘志红,王志新,何利兵,张燕军,李金泉,赵艳红,苏蕊. 山羊基因组研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(10): 928-938.
[4]	谈成, 边成, 杨达, 李宁, 吴珍芳, 胡晓湘, . 基因组选择技术在农业动物育种中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(11): 1033-1045.
[5]	王重龙, 丁向东, 刘剑锋, 殷宗俊, 张勤. 基因组育种值估计的贝叶斯方法研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(2): 111-118.
[6]	李恒德，包振民，孙效文. 基因组选择及其应用[J]. 遗传, 2011, 33(12): 1308-1316.