基因组选择技术在农业动物育种中的应用

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.17-286

遗传 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1033-1045.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.17-286

基因组选择技术在农业动物育种中的应用

谈成^1,^2,³(),边成¹,杨达⁴,李宁¹,吴珍芳^2,³(),胡晓湘¹()

1. 中国农业大学,农业生物技术国家重点实验室,北京 100193
2. 华南农业大学动物科学学院,国家生猪种业工程技术研究中心,广州 510642
3. 广东温氏食品集团股份有限公司,云浮 527400
4. 明尼苏达大学动物科学系,圣保罗 MN55108

收稿日期:2017-08-29 修回日期:2017-10-20 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-20
作者简介:谈成,博士,研究方向：动物分子数量遗传学。E-mail: tancheng200508@163.com|吴珍芳，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：动物遗传育种与繁殖。E-mail: wzfemail@163.com|胡晓湘，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：生物化学与分子生物学。E-mail: huxx@cau.edu.cn
基金资助:
农业部948项目(2012-G1(4));国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2011AA100301)

Application of genomic selection in farm animal breeding

Tan Cheng^1,^2,³(),Bian Cheng¹,Yang Da⁴,Li Ning¹,Wu Zhenfang^2,³(),Hu Xiaoxiang¹()

1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2. National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3. Guangdong Wens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Yunfu 527400, China
4. Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul MN 55108, USA

Received:2017-08-29 Revised:2017-10-20 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-20
Supported by:
the 948 Program of the Ministry of Agriculture of China(2012-G1(4));the National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program)(2011AA100301)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基因组选择(genomic selection, GS)是畜禽经济性状遗传改良的重要方法。随着高密度SNP芯片和二代测序价格的下降,GS技术越来越多被应用于奶牛、猪、鸡等农业动物育种中。然而,降低全基因组SNP分型成本、提高基因组育种值(genomic estimated breeding value,GEBV)估计准确性仍然是GS研究的主要难题。本文从全基因组SNP分型策略和GEBV估计模型两个方面进行了综述,并对目前GS技术在主要畜禽品种中的应用现状进行了介绍,以期为GS在农业动物育种中的深入开展提供借鉴和参考。

关键词: 基因组选择, 动物育种, 基因分型, 二代测序

Abstract:

Genomic selection (GS) has become a widely accepted method in animal breeding to genetically improve economic traits. With the declining costs of high-density SNP chips and next-generation sequencing, GS has been applied in dairy cattle, swine, poultry and other animals and gained varying degrees of success. Currently, major challenges in GS studies include further reducing the cost of genome-wide SNP genotyping and improving the predictive accuracy of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). In this review, we summarize various methods for genome-wide SNP genotyping and GEBV prediction, and give a brief introduction of GS in livestock and poultry breeding. This review will provide a reference for further implementation of GS in farm animal breeding.

Key words: genome selection, animal breeding, genotyping, next-generation sequencing

谈成, 边成, 杨达, 李宁, 吴珍芳, 胡晓湘, . 基因组选择技术在农业动物育种中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(11): 1033-1045.

Tan Cheng, Bian Cheng, Yang Da, Li Ning, Wu Zhenfang, Hu Xiaoxiang. Application of genomic selection in farm animal breeding[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2017, 39(11): 1033-1045.

参考文献

[1]	Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 2001, 157(4): 1819-1829.
[2]	Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10(6): 381-391.
[3]	Olson KM, VanRaden PM, Tooker ME, Cooper TA. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci, 2011, 94(5): 2613-2620.
[4]	Pszczola M, Calus MPL. Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations. Animal, 2016, 10(6): 1018-1024.
[5]	VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92(1): 16-24.
[6]	Spelman RJ, Hayes BJ, Berry DP. Use of molecular technologies for the advancement of animal breeding: genomic selection in dairy cattle populations in Australia, Ireland and New Zealand. Anim Prod Sci, 2013, 53(9): 869-875.
[7]	Ostersen T, Christensen OF, Henryon M, Nielsen B, Su GS, Madsen P. Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs. Genet Sel Evol, 2011, 43: 38.
[8]	Tribout T, Larzul C, Phocas F. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line. J Anim Sci, 2012, 90(12): 4164-4176.
[9]	Liu TF, Qu H, Luo CL, Li XW, Shu DM, Lund MS, Su GS. Genomic selection for the improvement of antibody response to newcastle disease and avian influenza virus in chickens. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): e112685.
[10]	Wolc A, Zhao HH, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Stricker C, Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Lamont SJ, Dekkers JCM. Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens. Genet Sel Evol, 2015, 47: 59.
[11]	Palaiokostas C, Ferraresso S, Franch R, Houston RD, Bargelloni L. Genomic prediction of resistance to pasteurellosis in gilthead sea bream (. Sparus aurata) using 2b- RAD sequencing. G3 (Bethesda), 2016, 6(11): 3693-3700.
[12]	Dou JZ, Li X, Fu Q, Jiao WQ, Li YP, Li TQ, Wang YF, Hu XL, Wang S, Bao ZM. Evaluation of the 2b-RAD method for genomic selection in scallop breeding. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 19244.
[13]	Beyene Y, Semagn K, Mugo S, Tarekegne A, Babu R, Meisel B, Sehabiague P, Makumbi D, Magorokosho C, Oikeh S, Gakunga J, Vargas M, Olsen M, Prasanna BM, Banziger M, Crossa J. Genetic gains in grain yield through genomic selection in eight Bi-parental maize populations under drought stress. Crop Sci, 2015, 55(1): 154-163.
[14]	Zhao YS, Gowda M, Liu WX, Würschum T, Maurer HP, Longin FH, Ranc N, Reif J. Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations. Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 124(4): 769-776.
[15]	Meuwissen TH. Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41(1): 35.
[16]	VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci, 2008, 91(11): 4414-4423.
[17]	Da Y. Multi-allelic haplotype model based on genetic partition for genomic prediction and variance component estimation using SNP markers. BMC Genet, 2015, 16: 144.
[18]	Ramos AM, Crooijmans RPMA, Affara NA, Amaral AJ, Archibald AL, Beever JE, Bendixen C, Churcher C, Clark R, Dehais P, Hansen MS, Hedegaard J, Hu ZL, Kerstens HH, Law AS, Megens HJ, Milan D, Nonneman DJ, Rohrer GA, Rothschild MF, Smith TPL, Schnabel RD, Van Tassell CP, Taylor JF, Wiedmann RT, Schook LB, Groenen MAM. Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS One, 2009, 4(8): e6524.
[19]	Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet, 2011, 12(7): 499-510.
[20]	Van Orsouw NJ, Hogers RCJ, Janssen A, Yalcin F, Snoeijers S, Verstege E, Schneiders H, Van Der Poel H, Van Oeveren J, Verstegen H, Van Eijk MJT. Complexity reduction of polymorphic sequences (CRoPS): A novel approach for large-scale polymorphism discovery in complex genomes. PLoS One, 2007, 2(11): e1172.
[21]	Van Tassell CP, Smith TPL, Matukumalli LK, Taylor JF, Schnabel RD, Lawley CT, Haudenschild CD, Moore SS, Warren WC, Sonstegard TS. SNP discovery and allele frequency estimation by deep sequencing of reduced representation libraries. Nat Methods, 2008, 5(3): 247-252.
[22]	Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, Johnson EA. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One, 2008, 3(10): e3376.
[23]	Andolfatto P, Davison D, Erezyilmaz D, Hu TT, Mast J, Sunayama-Morita T, Stern DL. Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping. Genome Res, 2011, 21(4): 610-617.
[24]	Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE. A robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One, 2011, 6(5): e19379.
[25]	Rife TW, Wu SY, Bowden RL, Poland JA. Spiked GBS: a unified, open platform for single marker genotyping and whole-genome profiling. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16: 248.
[26]	Poland JA, Brown PJ, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL. Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach. PLoS One, 2012, 7(2): e32253.
[27]	Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. Double digest RADseq: An inexpensive method for de novo snp discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One, 2012, 7(5): e37135.
[28]	Wang S, Meyer E, McKay JK, Matz MV. 2b-RAD: a simple and flexible method for genome-wide genotyping. Nat Methods, 2012, 9(8): 808-810.
[29]	Chen Q, Ma YF, Yang YM, Chen ZL, Liao RR, Xie XX, Wang Z, He PF, Tu YY, Zhang XZ, Yang CS, Yang HJ, Yu FQ, Zheng YM, Zhang ZW, Wang QS, Pan YC. Genotyping by genome reducing and sequencing for outbred animals. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e67500.
[30]	Jiang ZH, Wang HY, Michal JJ, Zhou X, Liu B, Woods LCS, Fuchs RA. Genome wide sampling sequencing for SNP genotyping: Methods, challenges and future development. Int J Biol Sci, 2016, 12(1): 100-108.
[31]	Hickey JM. Sequencing millions of animals for genomic selection 2.0. J Anim Breed Genet, 2013, 130(5): 331-332.
[32]	DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, Del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, McKenna A, Fennell TJ, Kernytsky AM, Sivachenko AY, Cibulskis K, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D, Daly MJ. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet, 2011, 43(5): 491-498.
[33]	Gorjanc G, Battagin M, Dumasy JF, Antolin R, Gaynor RC, Hickey JM. Prospects for cost-effective genomic selection via accurate within-family imputation. Crop Sci, 2017, 57(1): 216-228.
[34]	Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics, 2011, 12: 186.
[35]	Gianola D, De Los Campos G, Hill WG, Manfredi E, Fernando R. Additive genetic variability and the bayesian alphabet. Genetics, 2009, 183(1): 347-363.
[36]	Colombani C, Legarra A, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Croiseau P, Ducrocq V, Robert-Granié C. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds. J Dairy Sci, 2013, 96(1):575-591.
[37]	Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Bayesian backfitting (with comments and a rejoinder by the authors). Stat Sci, 2000, 15(3): 196-223.
[38]	Legarra A, Robert-Granié C, Croiseau P, Guillaume F, Fritz S. Improved Lasso for genomic selection. Genet Res, 2011, 93(1): 77-87.
[39]	Xu S. An expectation-maximization algorithm for the Lasso estimation of quantitative trait locus effects. Heredity, 2010, 105(5): 483-494.
[40]	De Los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D, Crossa J, Legarra A, Manfredi E, Weigel K, Cotes JM. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics, 2009, 182(1): 375-385.
[41]	Croiseau P, Legarra A, Guillaume F, Fritz S, Baur A, Colombani C, Robert-Granié C, Boichard D, Ducrocq V. Fine tuning genomic evaluations in dairy cattle through SNP pre-selection with the Elastic-Net algorithm. Genet Res, 2011, 93(6): 409-417.
[42]	Yi NJ, Xu SZ. Bayesian LASSO for quantitative trait loci mapping. Genetics, 2008, 179(2): 1045-1055.
[43]	Meuwissen TH, Solberg TR, Shepherd R, Woolliams JA. A fast algorithm for BayesB type of prediction of genome- wide estimates of genetic value. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 2.
[44]	Hayashi T, Iwata H. EM algorithm for Bayesian estimation of genomic breeding values. BMC Genet, 2010, 11: 3.
[45]	Sun W, Ibrahim JG, Zou F. Genomewide multiple-loci mapping in experimental crosses by iterative adaptive penalized regression. Genetics, 2010, 185(1): 349-529.
[46]	Shepherd RK, Meuwissen TH, Woolliams JA. Genomic selection and complex trait prediction using a fast EM algorithm applied to genome-wide markers. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010, 11: 529.
[47]	Mutshinda CM, Sillanp?? MJ. Extended bayesian LASSO for multiple quantitative trait loci mapping and unobserved phenotype prediction. Genetics, 2010, 186(3): 1067-1075.
[48]	Br?ndum RF, Su GS, Lund MS, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Genome position specific priors for genomic prediction. BMC Genomics, 2012, 13: 543.
[49]	Wang CL, Ding XD, Wang JY, Liu JF, Fu WX, Zhang Z, Yin ZJ, Zhang Q. Bayesian methods for estimating GEBVs of threshold traits. Heredity, 2013, 110(3): 213-219.
[50]	Ricard A, Danvy S, Legarra A. Computation of deregressed proofs for genomic selection when own phenotypes exist with an application in French show-jumping horses. J Anim Sci, 2013, 91(3): 1076-1085.
[51]	Da Y, Wang CK, Wang SW, Hu G. Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e87666.
[52]	Azevedo CF, De Resende MDV, Silva FF, Viana JMS, Valente MSF, Resende MFR Jr, Mu?oz P. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models. BMC Genet, 2015, 16: 105.
[53]	VanRaden PM, Null DJ, Sargolzaei M, Wiggans GR, Tooker ME, Cole JB, Sonstegard TS, Connor EE, Winters M, Van Kaam JBCHM, Valentini A, Van Doormaal BJ, Faust MA, Doak GA. Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes. J Dairy Sci, 2013, 96(1): 668-678.
[54]	Liu Z, Goddard ME, Reinhardt F, Reents R. A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects. J Dairy Sci, 2014, 97(9): 5833-5850.
[55]	Legarra A, Christensen OF, Aguilar I, Misztal I. Single Step, a general approach for genomic selection. Livest Sci, 2014, 166: 54-65.
[56]	Gao HD, Christensen OF, Madsen P, Nielsen US, Zhang Y, Lund MS, Su GS. Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population. Genet Sel Evol, 2012, 44: 8.
[57]	Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci, 2010, 93(2): 743-752.
[58]	Christensen OF, Madsen P, Nielsen B, Ostersen T, Su G. Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs. Animal, 2012, 6(10): 1565-1571.
[59]	Ostersen T, Christensen OF, Madsen P, Henryon M. Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs. Genet Sel Evol, 2016, 48: 48.
[60]	Legarra A, Aguilar I, Misztal I. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92(9): 4656-4663.
[61]	Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92(9): 4648-4655.
[62]	Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Lawlor TJ. Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins. J Dairy Sci, 2011, 94(8): 4198-4204.
[63]	Chesnais JP, Cooper TA, Wiggans GR, Sargolzaei M, Pryce JE, Miglior F. Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci, 2016, 99(3): 2413-2427.
[64]	Buch LH, S?rensen MK, Berg P, Pedersen LD, S?rensen AC. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle: Strong positive interaction between use of genotypic information and intensive use of young bulls on genetic gain. J Anim Breed Genet, 2012, 129(2): 138-151.
[65]	>Andersen-Ranberg I.A., Grindfleck E. Implementation of genomic selection in Norsvin genetic program: genetic gain in production and maternal traits in Norsvin Landrace. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Vancouver, Canada, 2014, 508.
[66]	Miar Y, Plastow G, Bruce H, Moore S, Manafiazar G, Kemp R, Charagu P, Huisman A, Van Haandel B, Zhang CY, McKay R, Wang ZQ. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between performance traits with meat quality and carcass characteristics in commercial crossbred pigs. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e110105.
[67]	Simianer H, Pimentel ECG. Robust QTL fine mapping by applying a quantitative transmission disequilibrium test to the Mendelian sampling term. J Anim Breed Genet, 2009, 126(6): 432-442.
[68]	Cleveland MA, Forni S, Deeb N, Maltecca C. Genomic breeding value prediction using three Bayesian methods and application to reduced density marker panels. BMC Proc, 2010, 4(Suppl. 1): S6.
[69]	Long N, Gianola D, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA, Avenda?o S. Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: application to early mortality in broilers. J Anim Breed Genet, 2007, 124(6): 377-389.
[70]	González-Recio O, Gianola D, Rosa GJ, Weigel KA, Kranis A. Genome-assisted prediction of a quantitative trait measured in parents and progeny: application to food conversion rate in chickens. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 3.
[71]	Simeone R, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Vitezica ZG. Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single- step genomic evaluation procedure. J Anim Breed Genet, 2012, 129(1): 3-10.
[72]	Wolc A, Zhao HH, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Stricker C, Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Lamont SJ, Dekkers JCM. Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens. Genet Sel Evol, 2015, 47(1): 59.
[73]	Liu TF, Qu H, Luo CL, Li XW, Shu DM, Lund MS, Su GS. Genomic selection for the improvement of antibody response to Newcastle disease and avian influenza virus in chickens. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): e112685.
[74]	Jiang J, Shen B, O'Connell JR, VanRaden PM, Cole JB, Ma L. Dissection of additive, dominance, imprinting effects for production and reproduction traits in Holstein cattle. BMC Genomics, 2017, 30. ; 18(1): 425.

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

基因组选择技术在农业动物育种中的应用

Application of genomic selection in farm animal breeding

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	何俊,Fernando B. Lopes,吴晓林. 动物基因组选配方法与应用[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(6): 486-493.
[2]	赵志达,张莉. 基因组选择在绵羊育种中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(4): 293-303.
[3]	周萌,景军红,毛瑞涵,郭静,王志鹏. 代谢组学在家养动物遗传育种中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(2): 111-124.
[4]	王凤红,张磊,李晓凯,范一星,乔贤,龚高,严晓春,张令天,王志英,王瑞军,刘志红,王志新,何利兵,张燕军,李金泉,赵艳红,苏蕊. 山羊基因组研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(10): 928-938.
[5]	黄莹,刘琪,池连江,石承民,吴祯,胡敏,石宏,陈华. BIG-Annotator：基因组测序数据高效功能注释及其在遗传诊断中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(11): 1015-1023.
[6]	胡健,周逸人,丁佳琳,王志远,刘凌,王业开,娄慧玲,乔守怡,吴燕华. ABO血型综合实验基因分型技术简化及其群体遗传分析拓展[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(5): 423-429.
[7]	李宏伟,王瑞军,王志英,李学武,王振宇,张燕军,苏蕊,刘志红,李金泉. 家畜基因组选择研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(5): 377-387.
[8]	王晨,李艳明,方向东. 肿瘤液态活检的研究进展及其临床应用[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(3): 220-231.
[9]	刘芳, 宋小珍, 谢华, 陈晓丽. 体细胞变异对神经系统常见肿瘤和发育异常类疾病的致病性[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(3): 196-205.
[10]	张哲, 罗元宇, 李晴晴, 贺金龙, 高宁, 张豪, 丁向东, 张勤, 李加琪. 一种基于高密度遗传标记的亲子鉴定方法及其应用[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(8): 835-841.
[11]	李文轲, 李丰余, 张思瑶, 蔡斌, 郑娜, 聂宇, 周到, 赵倩. 基因组二代测序数据的自动化分析流程[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(6): 618-624.
[12]	王重龙, 丁向东, 刘剑锋, 殷宗俊, 张勤. 基因组育种值估计的贝叶斯方法研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(2): 111-118.
[13]	周家蓬裴智勇陈禹保陈润生. 基于高通量测序的全基因组关联研究策略[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(11): 1099-1111.
[14]	杨波，贾丽丽，赵德超，孟丽云，刘雪锋，张燕军，张文广，李金泉. 奶山羊PIS遗传缺陷基因的检测及应用[J]. 遗传, 2012, 34(7): 895-900.
[15]	袁芳，徐进，季林丹，费丽娟，刘盼盼，张莉娜. Tm-shift基因分型方法在遗传学中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2012, 34(11): 1484-1490.