全基因组关联研究通路分析方法现状

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.16-419

遗传 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 707-716.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.16-419

全基因组关联研究通路分析方法现状

王钰嫣(),王子兴,胡耀达,王蕾,李宁,张彪,韩伟,姜晶梅()

中国医学科学院基础医学研究所,北京 100005

收稿日期:2017-03-25 修回日期:2017-04-25 出版日期:2017-08-20 发布日期:2017-12-25
作者简介:王钰嫣,博士研究生,专业方向：生物统计学。E-mail: wangyyamy@163.com|姜晶梅,博士,教授,研究方向：统计学方法在医学研究中的应用。E-mail: jingmeijiang@ibms.pumc.edu.cn
基金资助:
北京协和医学院研究生创新基金(10023-1001-1005)

Current status of pathway analysis in genome-wide association study

Wang Yuyan(),Wang Zixing,Hu Yaoda,Wang Lei,Li Ning,Zhang Biao,Han Wei,Jiang Jingmei()

Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005, China

Received:2017-03-25 Revised:2017-04-25 Online:2017-08-20 Published:2017-12-25
Supported by:
the Graduate Innovation Foundation of Peking Union Medical College, China(10023-1001-1005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

全基因组关联研究(genome-wide association study, GWAS)自2005年首次发表以来已不断增进人们对疾病遗传机制的认识,结合系统生物学并改进统计分析方法是对GWAS数据进行深度挖掘的重要途径。通路分析(pathway analysis)将GWAS所检测的遗传变异根据一定的生物学含义组合为集合进行分析,有利于发现对疾病单独效应小却在通路中相互关联的遗传变异,更有利于进行生物学解释。当前通路分析在GWAS数据上已有较为广泛的应用并取得初步成果。与此同时,通路分析的统计方法仍在不断发展。本文旨在介绍现有直接以SNP为对象的GWAS通路分析算法,根据方法中是否采用核函数分为非核算法和核算法两大类,其中非核算法主要包括基因功能富集分析(gene set enrichment analysis, GSEA)和分层贝叶斯优取(hierarchical Bayes prioritization, HBP),核算法包括线性核(linear kernel, LIN)、状态认证核(identity-by-status kernel, IBS)和尺度不变核(powered exponential kernel)。通过介绍这些方法的计算原理和优缺点,以期为新算法的构建提供更好的思路,为GWAS领域研究方法的选择提供参考。

关键词: 全基因组关联研究, 通路分析, 核算法

Abstract:

Since the first publication in 2005, the genome-wide association study (GWAS) strategy has contributed significantly to the understanding of the mechanisms of human genetic diseases. Integrations of statistical methods and systematic biology are important means to explore the GWAS data. Pathway analysis establishes the importance of genetic variants from GWAS and provides insights into their biological significance. It is conducive in correlating the genetic variants, which have only small but interactive changes, to their importance in the biological pathways. At present, pathway analysis has been widely applied to studies of GWAS data, with relatively good results. In the meantime, various analytical methods are being developed and adapted for research on more types of complex data. In this review, we summarize the statistical methods of pathway analysis on GWAS data, and divide them into non-kernel methods and kernel methods. The non-kernel methods include gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and hierarchical Bayes prioritization (HBP) analysis, while kernel methods include linear kernel (LIN), identity-by-status kernel (IBS) and powered exponential kernel. We have summarized the calculation principles and features of these statistical methods to provide insights for further developments of new algorithms in GWAS research.

Key words: genome-wide association study, pathway analysis, kernel methods

王钰嫣,王子兴,胡耀达,王蕾,李宁,张彪,韩伟,姜晶梅. 全基因组关联研究通路分析方法现状[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(8): 707-716.

Wang Yuyan,Wang Zixing,Hu Yaoda,Wang Lei,Li Ning,Zhang Biao,Han Wei,Jiang Jingmei. Current status of pathway analysis in genome-wide association study[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2017, 39(8): 707-716.

参考文献

[1]	Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet, 2005, 6( 2): 95-108.
[2]	Han JW, Zhang XJ. Current status of genome-wide association study. Hereditas (Beijing), 2011, 33(1): 25-35.
[2]	韩建文, 张学军. 全基因组关联研究现状. 遗传, 2011, 33(1): 25-35.
[3]	Yan WL. Genome-wide association study on complex diseases: genetic statistical issues. Hereditas (Beijing), 2008, 30(5): 543-549.
[3]	严卫丽. 复杂疾病全基因组关联研究进展——遗传统计分析. 遗传, 2008, 30(5): 543-549.
[4]	Yan WL. Genome-wide association study on complex diseases: study design and genetic markers. Hereditas (Beijing), 2008, 30(4): 400-406.
[4]	严卫丽. 复杂疾病全基因组关联研究进展——研究设计和遗传标记. 遗传, 2008, 30(4): 400-406.
[5]	Uitterlinden AG. An introduction to genome-wide association studies: GWAS for dummies. Semin Reprod Med, 2016, 34( 4): 196-204.
[6]	Zhou JP, Pei ZY, Chen YB, Chen RS. Strategies of genome-wide association study based on high-throughput sequencing. Hereditas (Beijing), 2014, 36(11): 1099-1111.
[6]	周家蓬, 裴智勇, 陈禹保, 陈润生. 基于高通量测序的全基因组关联研究策略. 遗传, 2014, 36(11): 1099-1111.
[7]	Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies-the next generation. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11( 1): 31-46.
[8]	Zhu ZH, Zhang FT, Hu H, Bakshi A, Robinson MR, Powell JE, Montgomery GW, Goddard ME, Wray NR, Visscher PM, Yang J. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat Genet, 2016, 48( 5):481-487.
[9]	Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, Henning AK, SanGiovanni JP, Mane SM, Mayne ST, Bracken MB, Ferris FL, Ott J, Barnstable C, Hoh J. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science, 2005, 308( 5720): 385-389.
[10]	Power RA, Parkhill J, de Oliveira T. Microbial genome-wide association studies: lessons from human GWAS. Nat Rev Genet, 2017, 18( 1): 41-50.
[11]	Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet, 2010, 42( 7): 565-569.
[12]	Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet, 2011, 88( 1): 76-82.
[13]	Manolio TA. Bringing genome-wide association findings into clinical use. Nat Rev Genet, 2013, 14( 8): 549-558.
[14]	GWAS Catalog. The NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies.[2016-12-10]. The NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies. [2016-12-10]. .
[15]	Wu C, Hu ZB, He ZH, Jia WH, Wang F, Zhou YF, Liu ZH, Zhan QM, Liu Y, Yu DK, Zhai K, Chang J, Qiao Y, Jin GF, Liu Z, Shen YY, Guo CH, Fu JH, Miao XP, Tan W, Shen HB, Ke Y, Zeng YX, Wu TC, Lin DX. Genome-wide association study identifies three new susceptibility loci for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in Chinese populations. Nat Genet, 2011, 43( 7): 679-684.
[16]	Shi YY, Hu ZB, Wu C, Dai JC, Li HZ, Dong J, Wang ML, Miao XP, Zhou YF, Lu F, Zhang HZ, Hu LM, Jiang Y, Li ZQ, Chu MJ, Ma HX, Chen JP, Jin GF, Tan WC, Wu TC, Zhang ZD, Lin DX, Shen HB. A genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for non-cardia gastric cancer at 3q13.31 and 5p13.1. Nat Genet, 2011, 43( 12): 1215-1218.
[17]	Wu C, Miao XP, Huang LM, Che X, Jiang GL, Yu DK, Yang XH, Cao GW, Hu ZB, Zhou YJ, Zuo CH, Wang CY, Zhang XH, Zhou YF, Yu XJ, Dai WJ, Li ZS, Shen HB, Liu LM, Chen YL, Zhang S, Wang XQ, Zhai K, Chang J, Liu Y, Sun MH, Cao W, Gao J, Ma Y, Zheng XW, Cheung ST, Jia YF, Xu J, Tan W, Zhao P, Wu TC, Wang CF, Lin DX. Genome-wide association study identifies five loci associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer in Chinese populations. Nat Genet, 2011, 44( 1): 62-66.
[18]	Bei JX, Li Y, Jia WH, Feng BJ, Zhou GQ, Chen LZ, Feng QS, Low HQ, Zhang HX, He FC, Tai ES, Kang T, Liu ET, Liu JJ, Zeng YX. A genome-wide association study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma identifies three new susceptibility loci. Nat Genet, 2010, 42( 7): 599-603.
[19]	Zhang FR, Liu H, Chen SM, Low HQ, Sun LD, Cui Y, Chu TS, Li Y, Fu XA, Yu YX, Yu GQ, Shi BQ, Tian HQ, Liu DC, Yu XL, Li JH, Lu N, Bao FF, Yuan CY, Liu J, Liu HX, Zhang L, Sun YH, Chen MF, Yang Q, Yang HT, Yang RD, Zhang LH, Wang Q, Liu H, Zuo FG, Zhang HZ, Khor CC, Hibberd ML, Yang S, Liu JJ, Zhang XJ. Identification of two new loci at IL23R and RAB32 that influence susceptibility to leprosy. Nat Genet, 2011, 43( 12): 1247-1251.
[20]	Sun LD, Cheng H, Wang ZX, Zhang AP, Wang PG, Xu JH, Zhu QX, Zhou HS, Ellinghaus E, Zhang FR, Pu XM, Yang XQ, Zhang JZ, Xu AE, Wu RN, Xu LM, Peng L, Helms CA, Ren YQ, Zhang C, Zhang SM, Nair RP, Wang HY, Lin GS, Stuart PE, Fan X, Chen G, Tejasvi T, Li P, Zhu J, Li ZM, Ge HM, Weichenthal M, Ye WZ, Zhang C, Shen SK, Yang BQ, Sun YY, Li SS, Lin Y, Jiang JH, Li CT, Chen RX, Cheng J, Jiang X, Zhang P, Song WM, Tang J, Zhang HQ, Sun L, Cui J, Zhang LJ, Tang B, Huang F, Qin Q, Pei XP, Zhou AM, Shao LM, Liu JL, Zhang FY, Du WD, Franke A, Bowcock AM, Elder JT, Liu JJ, Yang S, Zhang XJ. Association analyses identify six new psoriasis susceptibility loci in the Chinese population. Nat Genet, 2010, 42( 11): 1005-1009.
[21]	Quan C, Ren YQ, Xiang LH, Sun LD, Xu AE, Gao XH, Chen HD, Pu XM, Wu RN, Liang CZ, Li JB, Gao TW, Zhang JZ, Wang XL, Wang J, Yang RY, Liang L, Yu JB, Zuo XB, Zhang SQ, Zhang SM, Chen G, Zheng XD, Li P, Zhu J, Li YW, Wei XD, Hong WS, Ye Y, Zhang Y, Wu WS, Cheng H, Dong PL, Hu DY, Li Y, Li M, Zhang X, Tang HY, Tang XF, Xu SX, He SM, Lv YM, Shen M, Jiang HQ, Wang Y, Li K, Kang XJ, Liu YQ, Sun L, Liu ZF, Xie SQ, Zhu CY, Xu Q, Gao JP, Hu WL, Ni C, Pan TM, Li Y, Yao S, He CF, Liu YS, Yu ZY, Yin XY, Zhang FY, Yang S, Zhou Y, Zhang XJ. Genome-wide association study for vitiligo identifies susceptibility loci at 6q27 and the MHC. Nat Genet, 2010, 42( 7): 614-618.
[22]	Yang YZ, Wang YP, Ma L, Du Y, Ge RL. Genome-wide association study of high-altitude pulmonary edema in Han Chinese. Hereditas (Beijing), 2013, 35(11): 1291-1299.
[22]	杨应忠, 王亚平, 马兰, 杜洋, 格日力. 中国汉族高原肺水肿易感基因的全基因组关联研究. 遗传, 2013, 35(11): 1291-1299.
[23]	Xu RW, Yan WL. Advances in genome-wide association studies on essential hypertension. Hereditas (Beijing), 2012, 34(7): 793-809.
[23]	许睿玮, 严卫丽. 原发性高血压全基因组关联研究进展. 遗传, 2012, 34(7): 793-809.
[24]	Zheng W, Ji LD, Xing WH, Tu WW, Xu J. Advances in genome-wide association study of tuberculosis. Hereditas (Beijing), 2013, 35(7): 823-829.
[24]	郑伟, 季林丹, 邢文华, 涂巍巍, 徐进. 肺结核全基因组关联研究进展. 遗传, 2013, 35(7): 823-829.
[25]	Qiao HP, Zhang CY, Yu ZL, Li QM, Jiao Y, Cao JP. Genetic variants identified by GWAS was associated with colorectal cancer in the Han Chinese population. J Cancer Res Ther, 2015, 11( 2): 468-470.
[26]	Krueger JG, Fretzin S, Suárez-Fari?as M, Haslett PA, Phipps KM, Cameron GS, McColm J, Katcherian A, Cueto I, White T, Banerjee S, Hoffman RW. IL-17A is essential for cell activation and inflammatory gene circuits in subjects with psoriasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2012, 130(1): 145-154.e9.
[27]	Li L, Liao XP, Lin DX. The challenge and opportunity in the post genome-wide association study era. Chin J Prev Med, 2012, 46(3): 198-201.
[27]	刘丽, 缪小平, 林东昕. 后全基因组关联研究时代的机遇与挑战. 中华预防医学杂志, 2012, 46(3): 198-201.
[28]	Sanjak JS, Long AD, Thornton KR. A model of compound heterozygous, loss-of-function alleles is broadly consistent with observations from complex-disease GWAS datasets. PLoS Genet, 2017, 13( 1): e1006573.
[29]	Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, Cho JH, Guttmacher AE, Kong A, Kruglyak L, Mardis E, Rotimi CN, Slatkin M, Valle D, Whittemore AS, Boehnke M, Clark AG, Eichler EE, Gibson G, Haines JL, Mackay TFC, McCarroll SA, Visscher PM. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature, 2009, 461( 7265): 747-753.
[30]	Gibson G. Hints of hidden heritability in GWAS. Nat Genet, 2010, 42( 7): 558-560.
[31]	Hodge SE, Greenberg DA. How can we explain very low odds ratios in GWAS? I. polygenic models. Hum Hered, 2017, 81( 4): 173-180.
[32]	Quan C, Zhang XJ. Research strategies for the next step of genome-wide association study. Hereditas (Beijing), 2011, 33(2): 100-108.
[32]	权晟, 张学军. 全基因组关联研究的深度分析策略. 遗传, 2011, 33(2): 100-108.
[33]	Wang K, Li MY, Hakonarson H. Analysing biological pathways in genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11( 12): 843-854.
[34]	Saccone SF, Saccone NL, Swan GE, Madden PAF, Goate AM, Rice JP, Bierut LJ. Systematic biological prioritization after a genome-wide association study: an application to nicotine dependence. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24( 16): 1805-1811.
[35]	Li X. Bioinformatics. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2010: 219-220.
[35]	李霞. 生物信息学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2010: 219-220.
[36]	Luo XH, Liu ZF, Dong CZ. Advances on gene-based association analysis. Hereditas (Beijing), 2013, 35(9): 1065-1071.
[36]	罗旭红, 刘志芳, 董长征. 基因水平的关联分析方法. 遗传, 2013, 35(9): 1065-1071.
[37]	Liu G, Peng HR, Ni ZF, Qin DD, Song FW, Song GS, Sun QX. Integrating genetic and gene expression data: methods and applications of eQTL mapping. Hereditas (Beijing), 2008, 30(9): 1228-1236.
[37]	刘刚, 彭惠茹, 倪中福, 秦丹丹, 宋方威, 宋广树, 孙其信. 遗传与基因表达数据的整合——eQTL的方法及应用. 遗传, 2008, 30(9): 1228-1236.
[38]	Hormozdiari F, van de Bunt M, Segrè AV, Li X, Joo JWJ, Bilow M, Sul JH, Sankararaman S, Pasaniuc B, Eskin E. Colocalization of GWAS and eQTL signals detects target genes. Am J Hum Genet, 2016, 99( 6): 1245-1260.
[39]	Tinker NA, Mather DE. MQTL: software for simplifyied composite interval mapping of QTL in multiple environments. J Agric Genom, 1995, 1: 1-5.
[40]	Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstr?le M, Laurila E, Houstis N, Daly MJ, Patterson N, Mesirov JP, Golub TR, Tamayo P, Spiegelman B, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Groop LC. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet, 2003, 34( 3): 267-273.
[41]	Kao PYP, Leung KH, Chan LWC, Yip SP, Yap MKH. Pathway analysis of complex diseases for GWAS, extending to consider rare variants, multi-omics and interactions. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2017, 1861( 2): 335-353.
[42]	Kheirallah AK, Miller S, Hall IP, Sayers I. Translating lung function genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings: new insights for lung biology. Adv Genet, 2016, 93: 57-145.
[43]	Terada A, Yamada R, Tsuda K, Sese J. LAMPLINK: detection of statistically significant SNP combinations from GWAS data. Bioinformatics, 2016, 32( 22): 3513-3515.
[44]	Schierding W, Antony J, Cutfield WS, Horsfield JA, O'Sullivan JM. Intergenic GWAS SNPs are key components of the spatial and regulatory network for human growth. Hum Mol Genet, 2016, 25( 15): 3372-3382.
[45]	Wang K, Li MY, Bucan M. Pathway-based approaches for analysis of genomewide association studies. Am J Hum Genet, 2007, 81( 6): 1278-1283.
[46]	Debrabant B, Soerensen M. Gene set analysis for GWAS: assessing the use of modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol, 2014, 13( 5): 553-566.
[47]	Lewinger JP, Conti DV, Baurley JW, Triche TJ, Thomas DC. Hierarchical Bayes prioritization of marker associations from a genome-wide association scan for further investigation. Genet Epidemiol, 2007, 31( 8): 871-882.
[48]	Kaposi-Novak P, Libbrecht L, Woo HG, Lee YH, Sears NC, Conner EA, Factor VM, Roskams T, Thorgeirsson SS. Central role of c-Myc during malignant conversion in human hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res, 2009, 69( 7): 2775-2782.
[49]	Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2004, 96( 6): 434-442.
[50]	Xu ZY, Pan W. Binomial mixture model based association testing to account for genetic heterogeneity for GWAS. Genet Epidemiol, 2016, 40( 3): 202-209.
[51]	Wu MC, Maity A, Lee S, Simmons EM, Harmon QE, Lin XY, Engel SM, Molldrem JJ, Armistead PM. Kernel machine SNP-set testing under multiple candidate kernels. Genet Epidemiol, 2013, 37( 3): 267-275.
[52]	Liu DW, Ghosh D, Lin XH. Estimation and testing for the effect of a genetic pathway on a disease outcome using logistic kernel machine regression via logistic mixed models. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9: 292.
[53]	Larson NB, Schaid DJ. A kernel regression approach to gene-gene interaction detection for case-control studies. Genet Epidemiol, 2013, 37( 7): 695-703.
[54]	Wu MC, Kraft P, Epstein MP, Taylor DM, Chanock SJ, Hunter DJ, Lin XH. Powerful SNP-set analysis for case-control genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet, 2010, 86( 6): 929-942.
[55]	Schaid DJ. Genomic similarity and kernel methods II: methods for genomic information. Hum Hered, 2010, 70( 2): 132-140.
[56]	Cheverud JM. A simple correction for multiple comparisons in interval mapping genome scans. Heredity, 2001, 87( 1): 52-58.
[57]	Freytag S, Manitz J, Schlather M, Kneib T, Amos CI, Risch A, Chang-Claude J, Heinrich J, Bickeb?ller H. A network-based kernel machine test for the identification of risk pathways in genome-wide association studies. Hum Hered, 2013, 76( 2): 64-75.
[58]	Chen M, Cho J, Zhao HY. Incorporating biological pathways via a Markov random field model in genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet, 2011, 7( 4): e1001353.
[59]	Lee Y, Li HQ, Li JR, Rebman E, Achour I, Regan KE, Gamazon ER, Chen JL, Yang XH, Cox NJ, Lussier YA. Network models of genome-wide association studies uncover the topological centrality of protein interactions in complex diseases. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2013, 20( 4): 619-629.
[60]	International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Network-based multiple sclerosis pathway analysis with GWAS data from 15,000 cases and 30,000 controls. Am J Hum Genet, 2013, 92( 6): 854-865.
[61]	Kulminski AM, Loika Y, Culminskaya I, Arbeev KG, Ukraintseva SV, Stallard E, Yashin AI. Explicating heterogeneity of complex traits has strong potential for improving GWAS efficiency. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 35390.
[62]	Wu GD, Zhi DG. Pathway-based approaches for sequencing-based genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol, 2013, 37( 5): 478-494.
[63]	Zhong H, Yang X, Kaplan LM, Molony C, Schadt EE. Integrating pathway analysis and genetics of gene expression for genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet, 2010, 86( 4): 581-591.
[64]	Marigorta UM, Gibson G. A simulation study of gene-by- environment interactions in GWAS implies ample hidden effects. Front Genet, 2014, 5: 225.
[65]	Bakshi A, Zhu ZH, Vinkhuyzen AAE, Hill WD, McRae AF, Visscher PM, Yang J. Fast set-based association analysis using summary data from GWAS identifies novel gene loci for human complex traits. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 32894.
[66]	Bokanizad B, Tagett R, Ansari S, Helmi BH, Draghici S. SPATIAL: A system-level PAThway impact anaLysis approach. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016, 44( 11): 5034-5044.
[67]	Scheinfeldt LB, Schmidlen TJ, Gerry NP, Christman MF. Challenges in translating GWAS results to clinical care. Int J Mol Sci, 2016, 17( 8): 1267.

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

全基因组关联研究通路分析方法现状

Current status of pathway analysis in genome-wide association study

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	梁文权,侯豫,赵存友. 精神分裂症相关单核苷酸多态性调控microRNA功能研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(8): 677-685.
[2]	杨超, 杨瑞馥, 崔玉军. 细菌全基因组关联研究的方法与应用[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(1): 57-65.
[3]	陈开旭, 王为兰, 张富春, 郑秀芬. 人类身高的遗传学研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2015, 37(8): 741-755.
[4]	王立, 徐颜美, 程竹君, 熊招平, 邓立彬. 胆固醇代谢紊乱的遗传学研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(9): 857-863.
[5]	周家蓬裴智勇陈禹保陈润生. 基于高通量测序的全基因组关联研究策略[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(11): 1099-1111.
[6]	宋庆峰, 张红星, 马亦龙, 周钢桥. 复杂疾病的遗传易感基因区域的精细定位[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(1): 2-10.
[7]	罗旭红刘志芳董长征. 基因水平的关联分析方法[J]. 遗传, 2013, 35(9): 1065-1071.
[8]	郑伟季林丹邢文华涂巍巍徐进. 肺结核全基因组关联研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2013, 35(7): 823-829.
[9]	许睿玮，严卫丽. 原发性高血压全基因组关联研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2012, 34(7): 793-809.
[10]	李俊燕，谭英姿，冯国鄞，贺林，周里钢，陆灏. 糖尿病肾病遗传学研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2012, 34(12): 1537-1544.
[11]	权晟，张学军. 全基因组关联研究的深度分析策略[J]. 遗传, 2011, 33(2): 100-108.
[12]	韩建文，张学军. 全基因组关联研究现状[J]. 遗传, 2011, 33(1): 25-35.
[13]	曹宗富，马传香，王雷，蔡斌. 随机SNP在全基因组关联研究人群分层分析中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2010, 32(9): 921-928.
[14]	杨英，鲁向锋. 冠心病全基因组关联研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2010, 32(2): 97-104.
[15]	严卫丽. 复杂疾病全基因组关联研究进展——遗传统计分析[J]. 遗传, 2008, 30(5): 543-549.