假单胞菌噬菌体基因组学研究进展

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.19-272

遗传 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 752-759.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.19-272

假单胞菌噬菌体基因组学研究进展

徐志伟, 魏云林, 季秀玲()

昆明理工大学生命科学与技术学院,昆明 650500

收稿日期:2020-04-26 修回日期:2020-07-10 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-07-29
通讯作者: 季秀玲 E-mail:jixiuling1023@126.com
作者简介:徐志伟,在读硕士研究生,专业方向：低温微生物。E-mail: 511921187@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目资助编号(31860147);国家自然科学基金项目资助编号(31700324)

Progress on phage genomics of Pseudomonas spp.

Zhiwei Xu, Yunlin Wei, Xiuling Ji()

Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China

Received:2020-04-26 Revised:2020-07-10 Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-07-29
Contact: Ji Xiuling E-mail:jixiuling1023@126.com
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos(31860147);Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos(31700324)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

假单胞菌属(Pseudomonas spp.)是地球上重要的生态菌群之一,广泛分布于淡水、土壤等生态环境。假单胞菌噬菌体是以假单胞菌为宿主的病毒,不仅影响宿主的生存状况和进化过程,而且在生物物质循环和能量流动中扮演着重要角色。随着基因组测序技术的飞速发展,许多假单胞菌噬菌体的全基因组测序工作已经完成。截至2020年7月,GenBank收录的假单胞菌噬菌体基因组数有247条,占全部病毒基因组(10,069条)的2.45%。由于假单胞菌噬菌体基因组大小差异较大、遗传含量不同、基因组之间相似性较低,因此对假单胞菌噬菌体基因组的研究相对较少。本文主要对假单胞菌噬菌体基因组的特点、遗传多样性和功能基因方面的研究进行了综述,以期为理解细菌和噬菌体的对抗性共进化作用以及噬菌体的遗传进化提供参考。

关键词: 假单胞菌噬菌体, 基因组, 遗传多样性, 功能基因

Abstract:

Pseudomonas spp. are one of the most important ecological flora on the earth, widely distributed in freshwater, soil and other ecological environments. Pseudomonas phages are viruses hosted by Pseudomonas spp., which not only affect the survival and evolution of the hosts, but also play important roles in biomass circulation and energy flow. With the rapid development of genome sequencing technologies, the whole genome sequences of many Pseudomonas phages have been completed. As of July 2020, 247 Pseudomonas phage genomes were deposited in GenBank, accounting for 2.45% of the total 10,069 viral genomes. The genome sizes of Pseudomonas bacteriophages and the genetic contents are different, and the similarity between genomes is low, so the study on Pseudomonas bacteriophage genomes is relatively less. In this review, we summarize the characteristics, genetic diversity, and functional genes of Pseudomonas bacteriophages genomes in order to provide a reference for understanding the antagonistic coevolution of bacteria and phages and the genetic evolution of phages.

Key words: Pseudomonas phage, genome, genetic diversity, functional gene

徐志伟, 魏云林, 季秀玲. 假单胞菌噬菌体基因组学研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2020, 42(8): 752-759.

Zhiwei Xu, Yunlin Wei, Xiuling Ji. Progress on phage genomics of Pseudomonas spp.[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2020, 42(8): 752-759.

图/表 3

图1

图2

图3

参考文献 34

[1]	Silby MW, Winstanley C, Godfrey SA, Levy SB, Jackson RW . Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2011,35(4):652-680. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00269.x pmid: 21361996
[2]	Czajkowski R, Ozymko Z, de Jager V, Siwinska J, Smolarska A, Ossowicki A, Narajczyk M, Lojkowska E. Genomic, proteomic and morphological characterization of two novel broad host lytic bacteriophages ΦPD10.3 and ΦPD23.1 infecting pectinolytic Pectobacterium spp. and Dickeya spp. PLoS ONE, 2015,10(3):1-23.
[3]	Olszak T, Latka A, Roszniowski B, Valvano MA, Drulis- Kawa Z . Phage life cycles behind bacterial biodiversity. Curr Med Chem, 2017,24(36):3987-4001. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170413100136 pmid: 28412903
[4]	Alseth EO, Pursey E, Luján AM, McLeod I, Rollie C, Westra ER. Bacterial biodiversity drives the evolution of CRISPR-based phage resistance. Nature, 2019,574(7779):549-552. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1662-9 pmid: 31645729
[5]	Li TM, Du B . CRISPR-Cas system and coevolution of bacteria and phages. Hereditas(Beijing), 2011,33(3):213-218.
	李铁民, 杜波 . CRISPR-Cas系统与细菌和噬菌体的共进化. 遗传, 2011,33(3):213-218.
[6]	Ceyssens PJ, Hertveldt K, Ackermann HW, Noben JP, Demeke M, Volckaert G, Lavigne R . The intron-containing genome of the lytic Pseudomonas phage LUZ24 resembles the temperate phage PaP3. Virology, 2008,377(2):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.04.038 pmid: 18519145
[7]	Ceyssens PJ, Mesyanzhinov V, Sykilinda N, Briers Y, Roucourt B, Lavigne R, Robben J, Domashin A, Miroshnikov K, Volckaert G, Hertveldt K . The genome and structural proteome of YuA, a new Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage resembling M6. Journal of bacteriology, 2007,190(4):1429-1435. doi: 10.1128/JB.01441-07 pmid: 18065532
[8]	Hatfull GF, Pedulla ML, Jacobs-Sera D, Cichon PM, Foley A, Ford ME, Gonda RM, Houtz JM, Hryckowian AJ, Kelchner VA, Namburi S, Pajcini KV, Popovich MG, Schleicher DT, Simanek BZ, Smith AL, Zdanowicz GM, Kumar V, Peebles CL, Jacobs WR Jr, Lawrence JG, Hendrix RW . Exploring the mycobacteriophage metaproteome: phage genomics as an educational platform. PLoS Genet, 2006,2(6):e92. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020092 pmid: 16789831
[9]	Amgarten D, Martins LF, Lombardi KC, Antunes LP, de Souza APS, Nicastro GG, Kitajima EW, Quaggio RB, Upton C, Setubal JC, da Silva AM. Three novel Pseudomonas phages isolated from composting provide insights into the evolution and diversity of tailed phages. BMC Genomics, 2017,18(1):346-363. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3729-z pmid: 28472930
[10]	Wang PW, Chu LD, Guttman DS . Complete sequence and evolutionary genomic analysis of the pseudomonas aeruginosa transposable bacteriophage D3112. J Bacteriol, 2004,186(2):400-410. doi: 10.1128/jb.186.2.400-410.2004 pmid: 14702309
[11]	Ha AD, Denver DR . Comparative genomic analysis of 130 bacteriophages Infecting bacteria in the genus Pseudomonas. Front Microbiol, 2018,9:1456. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01456 pmid: 30022972
[12]	Wittmann J, Dreiseikelmann B, Rohde M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Bunk B, Rohde C . First genome sequences of achromobacter phages reveal new members of the N4 family. Virol J, 2014,11(1):2-15. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-11-2
[13]	Sillankorva S, Kluskens LD, Lingohr EJ, Kropinski AM, Neubauer P, Azeredo J . Complete genome sequence of the lytic Pseudomonas fluorescens phage ϕIBB-PF7A. Virol J, 2011,8:142. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-142 pmid: 21439081
[14]	Lu SG, Le S, Tan YL, Zhu JM, Li M, Rao XC, Zou LY, Li S, Wang J, Jin XL, Huang GT, Zhang L, Zhao X, Hu FQ . Genomic and proteomic analyses of the terminally redundant genome of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage PaP1: establishment of genus PaP1-like phages. PLoS One, 2013,8(5):e62933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062933 pmid: 23675441
[15]	Kwan T, Liu J, Dubow M, Gros P, Pelletier J . Comparative genomic analysis of 18 Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophages. J Bacteriol, 2006,188(3):1184-1187. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.3.1184-1187.2006 pmid: 16428425
[16]	Watkins SC, Sible E, Putonti C . Pseudomonas PB1-Like phages: whole genomes from metagenomes offer insight into an abundant group of bacteriophages. Viruses, 2018,10(1):331-344. doi: 10.3390/v10060331
[17]	Li M, Chen XR, Ma YS, Li ZB, Zhao QC . Complete genome sequence of PFP1, a novel T7-like Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteriophage. Arch Virol, 2018,163(1):3423-3426. doi: 10.1007/s00705-018-3979-3
[18]	Lu SG, Le S, Tan YL, Li M, Liu C, Zhang KB, Huang JJ, Chen HM, Rao XC, Zhu JM, Zou LY, Ni QS, Li S, Wang J, Jin XL, Hu QW, Yao XY, Zhao X, Zhang L, Huang GT, Hu FQ . Unlocking the mystery of the hard-to-sequence phage genome: PaP1 methylome and bacterial immunity. BMC Genomics, 2014,15(1):803-815. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-803
[19]	Aparicio T, de Lorenzo V, Martínez-García E . Improved thermotolerance of genome-reduced Pseudomonas putida EM42 enables effective functioning of the PL/cI857 system. Biotechnol J, 2019,14(1):1800483. doi: 10.1002/biot.v14.1
[20]	Zhang FJ, Huang KC, Yang XJ, Sun L, You JJ, Pan XW, Cui XL, Yang HJ . Characterization of a novel lytic podovirus O4 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch Virol, 2018,163(1):2377-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00705-018-3866-y
[21]	Carson S, Bruff E, DeFoor W, Dums J, Groth A, Hatfield T, Iyer A, Joshi K, McAdams S, Miles D, Miller D, Oufkir A, Raynor B, Riley S, Roland S, Rozier H, Talley S, Miller ES. Genome sequences of six paenibacillus larvae Siphoviridae Phages. Genome Announc, 2015,3(3):101-115.
[22]	Tang CF, Deng CJ, Zhang Y, Xiao C, Wang J, Rao XC, Hu FQ, Lu SG . Characterization and genomic analyses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa podovirus TC6: establishment of genus Pa11virus. Front Microbiol, 2018,9:2561. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02561 pmid: 30410478
[23]	Xu B, GAO J, GUO XK, Qin JH . Study on the biological and genomic characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage D204. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ, 2016,36(1):1-5.
	徐彬, 高晶, 郭晓奎, 秦金红 . 铜绿假单胞菌噬菌体D204的生物学特性和基因组学研究. 上海交通大学学报, 2016,36(1):1-5.
[24]	Cui XL . Screening of genes related to pseudomonas aeruginosa response to multiple strains of phage infection and functional annotation of phage C11 genome [Dissertation]. Sc i Tech of Tianjin Univ, 2016.
	崔晓莉 . 铜绿假单胞菌应答多株噬菌体感染相关基因的筛选及噬菌体C11基因组的功能注释[学位论文]. 天津科技大学, 2016.
[25]	Sharma S, Chatterjee S, Datta S, Prasad R, Dubey D, Prasad RK, Vairale MG . Bacteriophages and its applications: an overview. Folia Microbiol (Praha), 2017,62(1):17-55. doi: 10.1007/s12223-016-0471-x
[26]	Cao HL, Lai Y, Bougouffa S, Xu ZL, Yan AX . Comparative genome and transcriptome analysis reveals distinctive surface characteristics and unique physiological potentials of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853. BMC Genomics, 2017,18(1):459-475. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3842-z pmid: 28606056
[27]	De Smet J, Hendrix H, Blasdel BG, Danis-Wlodarczyk K, Lavigne R . Pseudomonas predators: understanding and exploiting phage-host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2017,15(9):517-530. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.61 pmid: 28649138
[28]	Liang CJ, Meng FM, Ai YC . CRISPR/Cas systems in genome engineering of bacteriophages. Hereditas(Beijing), 2018,40(5):378-389.
	梁彩娇, 孟繁梅, 艾云灿 . 基于CRISPR/Cas系统的噬菌体基因组编辑. 遗传, 2018,40(5):378-389.
[29]	Pawluk A, Bondy-Denomy J, Cheung VH, Maxwell KL, Davidson AR . A new group of phage anti-CRISPR genes inhibits the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio, 2014,5(2):e00896. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00896-14 pmid: 24736222
[30]	Habusha M, Tzipilevich E, Fiyaksel O, Ben-Yehuda S . A mutant bacteriophage evolved to infect resistant bacteria gained a broader host range. Mol Microbiol, 2019,111(6):1463-1475. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14231 pmid: 30811056
[31]	Holguín AV, Cárdenas P, Prada-Peñaranda C, Rabelo Leite L, Buitrago C, Clavijo V, Oliveira G, Leekitcharoenphon P, Møller Aarestrup F, Vives MJ . Host resistance, genomics and population dynamics in a salmonella Eenteritidis and phage system. Viruses, 2019,11(2):188. doi: 10.3390/v11020188
[32]	Li M, Cheng FY, Gong LY, Xiang H . Systematic discovery of novel prokaryotic defense systems: progress and prospects. Hereditas(Beijing), 2018,40(4):259-265.
	李明, 程飞跃, 龚路遥, 向华 . 微生物新型防御系统的系统性发现与展望. 遗传, 2018,40(4):259-265.
[33]	Gao SH, Yu HY, Wu SY, Wang S, Geng JN, Luo YF, Hu SN . Advances of sequencing and assembling technologies for complex genomes. Hereditas(Beijing), 2018,40(11):944-963.
	高胜寒, 禹海英, 吴双阳, 王森, 耿佳宁, 骆迎峰, 胡松年 . 复杂基因组测序技术研究进展. 遗传, 2018,40(11):944-963.
[34]	Sternberg SH, Richter H, Charpentier E, Qimron U . Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol Cell, 2016,61(6):797-808. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.030 pmid: 26949040

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

假单胞菌噬菌体基因组学研究进展

Progress on phage genomics of Pseudomonas spp.

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	廉小平, 黄光福, 张玉娇, 张静, 胡凤益, 张石来. 长雄野生稻有利基因的发掘与利用[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(9): 765-780.
[2]	时文睿, 渠鸿竹, 方向东. 痛风的多组学研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(8): 643-657.
[3]	马钧, 樊安平, 王武生, 张金川, 江晓军, 马瑞军, 贾社强, 刘飞, 雷初朝, 黄永震. 全基因组重测序解析秦川牛保种群遗传多样性和遗传结构[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(7): 602-616.
[4]	高智慧, 黄佳新, 罗昊玉, 徐海冬, 娄明, 宁博林, 邢晓旭, 牟芳, 李辉, 王宁. 鸡NRG4基因组及转录本结构分析[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(5): 447-458.
[5]	王舜泽, 江丰, 朱东丽, 杨铁林, 郭燕. Hi-C技术在三维基因组学和疾病致病机理研究中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(4): 279-294.
[6]	徐丹同, 王祎菲, 蔡佳丽, 龚文滔, 潘向春, 田雨晗, 沈箐鹏, 李加琪, 袁晓龙. 利用人类全基因组亚硫酸氢盐测序数据检测CNVs的研究[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(4): 324-340.
[7]	陈秀丽, 黄海燕, 吴强. 靶向敲除β-珠蛋白基因座控制区增强子HS2对K562细胞转录组的影响[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(9): 783-797.
[8]	许梦萱, 周明. 植物RNA聚合酶IV调控DNA甲基化和发育的研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(7): 567-580.
[9]	平婉菁, 刘逸宸, 付巧妹. 沉积物古DNA探秘灭绝古人类演化[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(5): 362-369.
[10]	徐纪明, 朱建树, 李梦真, 胡晗, 毛传澡. 侧翼序列获取技术研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(4): 313-321.
[11]	寇洁, 李严, 王鹏, 刘红, 刘佳文, 王涓, 王也, 张亮, 沈富军. 大熊猫遗传多样性评估的微卫星分型体系优化[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(3): 253-266.
[12]	刘聪, 冯佳妮, 李玮玮, 朱伟伟, 薛云新, 王岱, 赵西林. 细胞dNTP库的稳态维持与基因组稳定性[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(2): 96-106.
[13]	李玲红, 苟彤, 任爱霞, 丁鹏程, 林文, 武祥云, 孙敏, 高志强. 藜麦基因组学与重要农艺性状位点研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2022, 44(11): 1009-1027.
[14]	周聪, 周强伟, 成盛, 李国亮. CTCF在介导三维基因组形成及调控基因表达中的研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(9): 816-821.
[15]	蒋婧, 赵安麒, 谢甜, 陈淑藯, 李劲松. 全基因组蛋白质的标签细胞和小鼠资源库建设[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(7): 704-714.