水稻抗稻瘟病天然免疫机制及抗病育种新策略

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1005.2014.0756

遗传 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 756-765.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2014.0756

水稻抗稻瘟病天然免疫机制及抗病育种新策略

何峰^{1, 2}, 张浩^{1, 2}, 刘金灵¹, 王志龙¹, 王国梁^{1, 2}

1. 湖南农业大学农学院,长沙 410128;
2. 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所,北京100193

收稿日期:2014-04-08 出版日期:2014-08-20 发布日期:2013-07-19
通讯作者: 王国梁,博士,教授,研究方向：植物抗病与功能基因组学。E-mail:wang.620@osu.edu
作者简介:何峰,硕士研究生,专业方向：作物基因工程。E-mail: hf36606@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(编号：2012CB114005)和湖南省高校科技创新团队支持计划项目(2012)资助

Recent advances in understanding the innate immune mechanisms and developing new disease resistance breeding strategies against the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in rice

Feng He^{1, 2}, Hao Zhang^{1, 2}, Jinling Liu¹, Zhilong Wang¹, Guoliang Wang^{1, 2}

1. College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University , Changsha 410128, China;
2. Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2014-04-08 Online:2014-08-20 Published:2013-07-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 稻瘟病是水稻最严重的病害之一,由子囊菌(Magnaporthe oryzae)引起。利用抗病品种是防治稻瘟病最经济、最有效的措施。近年来,稻瘟病已发展为研究植物与病原真菌分子互作机制的模式系统,在水稻与稻瘟菌互作和寄主抗性分子生物学、基因组学和蛋白组学等领域取得了一系列重要的研究成果。文章综述了近年来水稻抗稻瘟病两种天然免疫机制,即病原菌相关分子模式诱导和效应蛋白诱导的抗病机制研究的最新进展,讨论了GWAS、TALLEN、CRISPR和HIGS等基因组研究新方法和新技术在水稻抗病育种中的应用,并对目前稻瘟病抗性机制研究和抗病育种中的问题和挑战进行了探讨和展望。

关键词: 水稻, 稻瘟病, 抗病性, 病原菌相关分子模式诱导抗病性, 效应蛋白诱导抗病性

Abstract: Rice blast, caused by the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae, is one of the most destructive diseases in rice. Utilization of resistant cultivars is the most effective and economic strategy against the disease. Recently, rice blast has become an advanced model system for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of plant-fungal interactions. Significant progress has been made in the molecular biology, genomics and proteomics of the rice-M. oryzae interaction and host resistance in the last few years. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) in rice against M. oryzae, and propose the new strategies for blast resistance molecular breeding. We also discuss the new challenges for future investigations.

Key words: rice, rice blast, disease resistance, PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI), effector-triggered immunity (ETI)

何峰, 张浩, 刘金灵, 王志龙, 王国梁. 水稻抗稻瘟病天然免疫机制及抗病育种新策略[J]. 遗传, 2014, 36(8): 756-765.

Feng He, Hao Zhang, Jinling Liu, Zhilong Wang, Guoliang Wang. Recent advances in understanding the innate immune mechanisms and developing new disease resistance breeding strategies against the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in rice[J]. HEREDITAS(Beijing), 2014, 36(8): 756-765.

参考文献

[1] R, Van Kan JA, Pretorius ZA, Hammond-Kosack KE, Di Pietro A, Spanu PD, Rudd JJ, Dickman M, Kahmann R, Ellis J, Foster GD. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol , 2012, 13(4): 414-430.
[2] P, Gurr SJ. Against the grain: safeguarding rice from rice blast disease. Trends Biotechnol , 2009, 27(3): 141-150.
[3] JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature , 2006, 444(7117): 323-329.
[4] T, He SY. Innate immunity in plants: an arms race between pattern recognition receptors in plants and effectors in microbial pathogens. Science , 2009, 324(5928): 742-744.
[5] BJ, Cotter PA, Miller JF. Ectopic expression of the flagellar regulon alters development of the Bordetella-host interaction. Cell , 1995, 80(4): 611-620.
[6] G, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Niehaus K, Boller T, Felix G. The N terminus of bacterial elongation factor Tu elicits innate immunity in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell , 2004, 16(12): 3496-3507.
[7] M, Newman MA, von Roepenack E. The induction and modulation of plant defense responses by bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Annu Rev Phytopathol , 2000, 38: 241-261.
[8] G, Silipo A, Aslam S, De Castro C, Liparoti V, Flagiello A, Pucci P, Lanzetta R, Parrilli M, Molinaro A. Peptidoglycan and muropeptides from pathogens agrobacterium and xanthomonas elicit plant innate immunity: structure and activity. Chem Biol , 2008, 15(5): 438-448.
[9] T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu W-L, Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T, Ausubel FM, Sheen J. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature , 2002, 415(6875): 977-983.
[10] Y, Tsuda K, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F. Physical association of pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-trig-gered immunity (ETI) immune receptors in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Pathol , 2011, 12(7): 702-708.
[11] BPHJ, Nürnberger T, Joosten MHAJ. Of PAMPs and effectors: the blurred PTI-ETI dichotomy. Plant Cell , 2011, 23(1): 4-15.
[12] G, Duran JD, Volko S, Boller T. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J , 1999, 18(3): 265-276.
[13] R, Isogai A, Takayama S, Che FS. Analysis of flagellin perception mediated by flg22 receptor OsFLS2 in rice. Mol Plant Microbe Interact , 2008, 21(12): 1635- 1642.
[14] Y, Li L, Macho AP, Han Z, Hu Z, Zipfel C, Zhou JM, Chai J. Structural basis for flg22-induced activation of the Arabidopsis FLS2-BAK1 immune complex. Science , 2013, 342(6158): 624-628.
[15] D, Wu S, Gao X, Zhang Y, Shan L, He P. A receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase, BIK1, associates with a flagellin receptor complex to initiate plant innate immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2010, 107(1): 496-501.
[16] Y, Sklenar J, Derbyshire P, Stransfeld L, Asai S, Ntoukakis V, Jones JD, Shirasu K, Menke F, Jones A. Direct regulation of the NADPH oxidase RBOHD by the PRR-Associated kinase BIK1 during plant immunity. Mol Cell , 2014, 54(1): 43-55.
[17] L, Li M, Yu LP, Zhou ZY, Liang XX, Liu ZX, Cai GH, Gao LY, Zhang XJ, Wang YC, Chen S, Zhou JM. The FLS2-Associated kinase BIK1 directly phosphorylates the NADPH oxidase RbohD to control plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe , 2014, 15(3): 329-338.
[18] D, Wang L, Wang M, Xu YY, Luo W, Liu YJ, Xu ZH, Li J, Chong K. Engineering OsBAK1 gene as a molecular tool to improve rice architecture for high yield. Plant B i otechnol J , 2009, 7(8): 791-806.
[19] 磷酸-1-鞘氨醇在植物抗病反应中的作用及水稻和拟南芥 BIK1 在逆境反应中的功能分析[学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2009.
[20] A, Albert P, Shinya T, Desaki Y, Ichimura K, Shirasu K, Narusaka Y, Kawakami N, Kaku H, Shibuya N. CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2007, 104(49): 19613-19618.
[21] Ei, Mitsutomi M, Nagano Y. Direct binding of a plant LysM receptor-like kinase, LysM RLK1/CERK1, to chitin in vitro. J Biol Chem , 2010, 285(5): 2996-3004.
[22] EK, Jones AM, Serazetdinova L, Lipka U, Lipka V. The lysin mot

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

水稻抗稻瘟病天然免疫机制及抗病育种新策略

Recent advances in understanding the innate immune mechanisms and developing new disease resistance breeding strategies against the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in rice

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	卞中, 曹东平, 庄文姝, 张舒玮, 刘巧泉, 张林. 水稻分子设计育种启示：传统与现代相结合[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(9): 718-740.
[2]	刘向东, 吴锦文, 陆紫君, Muhammad Qasim Shahid. 同源四倍体水稻：低育性机理、改良与育种展望[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(9): 781-792.
[3]	郝小花, 胡爽, 赵丹, 田连福, 谢子靖, 吴莎, 胡文俐, 雷晗, 李东屏. OsGA3ox通过合成不同活性GA调控水稻育性及株高[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(9): 845-855.
[4]	郑镇武, 赵宏源, 梁晓娅, 王一珺, 王驰航, 巩高洋, 黄金燕, 张桂权, 王少奎, 刘祖培. 水稻qGL3.4调控籽粒大小与株型[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(9): 835-844.
[5]	陈明江, 刘贵富, 肖叶青, 余泓, 李家洋. 中科发早粳1号分子设计育种[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(9): 829-834.
[6]	刘永强, 李威威, 刘昕禹, 储成才. 水稻分蘖氮响应调控机理研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(5): 367-378.
[7]	李姗, 黄允智, 刘学英, 傅向东. 作物氮肥利用效率遗传改良研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(7): 629-641.
[8]	张昌泉, 冯琳皓, 顾铭洪, 刘巧泉. 江苏省水稻品质性状遗传和重要基因克隆研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(5): 425-441.
[9]	代航, 李延, 刘树春, 林磊, 吴娟燕, 张志杰, 彭崎春, 李楠, 张向前. 类伸展蛋白OsPEX1对水稻花粉育性的影响[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(3): 271-279.
[10]	闫凌月, 张豪健, 郑雨晴, 丛韫起, 刘次桃, 樊帆, 郑铖, 袁贵龙, 潘根, 袁定阳, 段美娟. 转录因子OsMADS25提高水稻对低温的耐受性[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(11): 1078-1087.
[11]	胡雅丽, 戴睿, 刘永鑫, 张婧赢, 胡斌, 储成才, 袁怀波, 白洋. 水稻典型品种日本晴和IR24根系微生物组的解析[J]. 遗传, 2020, 42(5): 506-518.
[12]	张桂权. 基于SSSL文库的水稻设计育种平台[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(8): 754-760.
[13]	刘次桃, 王威, 毛毕刚, 储成才. 水稻耐低温逆境研究：分子生理机制及育种展望[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(3): 171-185.
[14]	杨德卫, 郑向华, 程朝平, 叶宁, 黄凤凰, 叶新福. 基于CSSLs群体定位和图位克隆水稻长芒基因GAD1-2[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(12): 1101-1111.
[15]	辛高伟, 胡熙璕, 王克剑, 王兴春. Cas9蛋白变体VQR高效识别水稻NGAC前间区序列邻近基序[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(12): 1112-1119.