杂交粳稻花优14及其亲本孕穗期剑叶的基因表达谱芯片分析

doi:10.16288/j.yczz.15-094

遗传 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 932-938.doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.15-094

杂交粳稻花优14及其亲本孕穗期剑叶的基因表达谱芯片分析

储黄伟¹, 牛付安¹, 程灿¹, 周继华¹, 王新其¹, 罗小金², 袁勤¹, 曹黎明¹

1. 上海市农业科学院,作物育种栽培研究所,上海 201403;
2. 复旦大学生命科学学院,上海 200433

收稿日期:2015-03-03 修回日期:2015-07-29 出版日期:2015-09-20 发布日期:2015-09-20
通讯作者: 曹黎明,研究员,研究方向：水稻杂种优势利用。E-mail: clm079@163.com 袁勤,研究员,研究方向：水稻杂种优势利用。E-mail: zw3@saas.sh.cn
作者简介:储黄伟,博士,助理研究员,研究方向：植物分子生物学。E-mail：chuhuangwei@saas.sh.cn
基金资助:
上海市科技兴农重点攻关项目(编号：沪农科攻字(2014)第7-1-2号和沪农科攻字(2013)第1-3号)和上海市科委农业科技攻关项目; (编号：14395810601)资助

Gene expression profiling of flag leaves at the booting stage in the japonica hybrid rice Huayou14 and its parental lines by microarray

Huangwei Chu¹, Fuan Niu¹, Can Cheng¹, Jihua Zhou¹, Xinqi Wang¹, Xiaojin Luo², Qin Yuan¹, Liming Cao¹

1. Institute of Crop Breeding and Cultivation, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China;
2. School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

Received:2015-03-03 Revised:2015-07-29 Online:2015-09-20 Published:2015-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以孕穗期的杂交粳稻花优14及其母本申9A和父本繁14的剑叶为材料,利用Affymetrix水稻基因组芯片检测了3个样品中的基因表达谱,并用生物信息学方法对差异表达基因进行了分析。结果表明：与其亲本相比,杂交粳稻花优14中共有2057个基因的表达水平出现了2倍(变化倍数≥2或≤0.5)以上的变化。通过对这些差异表达基因进行GO(Gene Ontology)功能分类,发现差异表达基因在光合系统Ⅰ、叶绿体膜和叶绿体被膜等与叶绿体相关的细胞组分中显著富集;同时差异表达基因还在叶绿素合成、叶绿素代谢和类胡萝卜素合成等生物学过程中富集。光合作用效率的改变可能和花优14杂种优势的形成相关。与已报道结果不同,本文在代谢途径分析结果中并没有发现花优14中差异表达基因在碳固定和光合作用等途径中显著的富集,但是发现差异表达基因在光合作用-天线蛋白以及淀粉和蔗糖的代谢途径中显著富集。该结果表明,在不同的杂交组合中,参与杂种优势形成的基因或者代谢途径可能是不同的。

关键词: 水稻, 杂交粳稻, 杂种优势, 基因芯片, 光合作用

Abstract: Gene expression profiling using microarray has contributed significantly to heterosis studies. Using the Affymetrix rice genome array, we investigated gene expression profiles in the flag leaves of the japonica hybrid rice Huayou14 and its parental cultivars Shen9A and Fan14 at the booting stage. A total of 2057 genes differentially expressed (fold change ≥2 or ≤0.5) between Huayou14 and its parents were identified. Functional classification of the differentially expressed genes by Gene Ontology (GO) analysis indicated the differentially expressed genes were significantly enriched in photosynthesis-related cellular component categories (e.g. photosystem Ⅰ, chloroplast membrane and chloroplast envelope), and biological process categories (e.g. chlorophyll catabolic, chlorophyll biosynthetic and carotenoid biosynthetic processes). These results suggest that the changes in the photosynthetic ability of the japonica hybrid rice Huayou14 may be related to heterosis. Metabolic pathway analysis indicated that differentially expressed genes were significantly enriched in photosynthesis-antenna proteins and starch and sucrose metabolic pathways, instead of photosynthesis and carbon fixation pathways as reported previously. These results suggest that different genes or metabolic pathways might contribute to the heterosis of different hybrid combinations.

Key words: rice, japonica hybrid rice, heterosis, microarray, photosynthesis

储黄伟, 牛付安, 程灿, 周继华, 王新其, 罗小金, 袁勤, 曹黎明. 杂交粳稻花优14及其亲本孕穗期剑叶的基因表达谱芯片分析[J]. 遗传, 2015, 37(9): 932-938.

Huangwei Chu, Fuan Niu, Can Cheng, Jihua Zhou, Xinqi Wang, Xiaojin Luo, Qin Yuan, Liming Cao. Gene expression profiling of flag leaves at the booting stage in the japonica hybrid rice Huayou14 and its parental lines by microarray[J]. HEREDITAS(Beijing), 2015, 37(9): 932-938.

参考文献

[1] Shull GH. The composition of a field of maize. J Hered , 1908, 4(1): 296-301.
[2] 许晨璐, 孙晓梅, 张守攻. 基因差异表达与杂种优势形成机制探讨. 遗传, 2013, 35(6): 714-726.
[3] Davenport CB. Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science , 1908, 28(718): 454-455.
[4] Bruce AB. The mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science , 1910, 32(827): 627-628.
[5] East EM. Inbreeding in corn. Connecticut Agric Exp Stn Rep , 1908, 1907: 419-428.
[6] Yu SB, Li JX, Xu CG, Tan YF, Gao YJ, Li XH, Zhang QF, Saghai Maroof MA. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 1997, 94(17): 9226-9231.
[7] Hochholdinger F, Hoecker N. Towards the molecular basis of heterosis. Trends Plant Sci , 2007, 12(9): 427-432.
[8] Schnable PS, Springer NM. Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol , 2013, 64: 71-88.
[9] Bao JY, Lee S, Chen C, Zhang XQ, Zhang Y, Liu SQ, Clark T, Wang J, Cao ML, Yang HM, Wang SM, Yu J. Serial analysis of gene expression study of a hybrid rice strain ( LYP9 ) and its parental cultivars. Plant Physiol , 2005, 138(3): 1216-1231.
[10] Song SH, Qu HZ, Chen C, Hu SN, Yu J. Differential gene expression in an elite hybrid rice cultivar ( Oryza sativa L.) and its parental lines based on SAGE data. BMC Plant Biol , 2007, 7: 49.
[11] Ge XM, Chen WH, Song SH, Wang WW, Hu SN, Yu J. Transcriptomic profiling of mature embryo from an elite super-hybrid rice LYP9 and its parental lines. BMC Plant Biol , 2008, 8: 114.
[12] Wei G, Tao Y, Liu GZ, Chen C, Luo RY, Xia HA, Gan Q, Zeng HP, Lu ZK, Han YN, Li XB, Song GS, Zhai HL, Peng YG, Li DY, Xu HL, Wei XL, Cao ML, Deng HF, Xin YY, Fu XQ, Yuan LP, Yu J, Zhu Z, Zhu LH. A transcriptomic analysis of superhybrid rice LYP9 and its parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2009, 106(19): 7695-7701.
[13] Song GS, Zhai HL, Peng YG, Zhang L, Wei G, Chen XY, Xiao YG, Wang LL, Chen YJ, Wu B, Chen B, Zhang Y, Chen H, Feng XJ, Gong WK, Liu Y, Yin ZJ, Wang F, Liu GZ, Xu HL, Wei XL, Zhao XL, Ouwerkerk PBF, Hankemeier T, Reijmers T, van der Heijden R, Lu CM, Wang M, van der Greef J, Zhu Z. Comparative transcriptional profiling and preliminary study on heterosis mechanism of super-hybrid rice. Mol Plant , 2010, 3(6): 1012-1025.
[14] Zhai RR, Feng Y, Wang HM, Zhan XD, Shen XH, Wu WM, Zhang YX, Chen DB, Dai GX, Yang ZL, Cao LY, Cheng SH. Transcriptome analysis of rice root heterosis by RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics , 2013, 14: 19.
[15] Peng YG, Wei G, Zhang L, Liu GZ, Wei XL, Zhu Z. Comparative transcriptional profiling of three super-hybrid rice combinations. Int J Mol Sci , 2014, 15(3): 3799-3815.
[16] Swanson-Wagner RA, Jia Y, De Cook R, Borsuk LA, Nettleton D, Schnable PS. All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F 1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2006, 103(18): 6805-6810.
[17] Uzarowska A, Keller B, Piepho HP, Schwarz G, Ingvardsen C, Wenzel G, Lubberstedt T. Comparative expression profiling in meristems of inbred-hybrid triplets of maize based on morphological investigations of heterosis for plant height. Plant Mol Biol , 2007, 63(1): 21-34.
[18] Hoecker N, Keller B, Muthreich N, Chollet D, Descombes P, Piepho HP, Hochholdinger F. Comparison of maize ( Zea mays L.) F 1 -hybrid and parental inbred line primary root transcriptomes suggests organ-specific patterns of nonadditive gene expression and conserved expression trends. Genetics , 2008, 179(3): 1275-1283.
[19] Vuylsteke M, van Eeuwijk F, van Hummelen P, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. Genetic analysis of variation in gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana . Genetics , 2005, 171(3): 1267-1275.
[20] Tsaftaris SA. Molecular aspects of heterosis in plants. Physiol Plantarum , 1995, 94(2): 362-370.
[21] Yuan LP. Development of hybrid rice to ensure food security. Rice Sci , 2014, 21(1): 1-2.
[22] Cheng SH, Zhuang JY, Fan YY, Du JH, Cao LY. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: a super-domesticate in China. Ann Bot , 2007, 100(5): 959-966.
[23] 程灿, 周继华, 曹黎明, 倪林娟, 袁勤. 优质杂交粳稻新组合花优14的选育. 见: 第l届中国杂交水稻大会论文集, 长沙, 2010: 212-213.
[24] Dupuy D, Bertin N, Hidalgo CA, Venkatesan K, Tu D, Lee D, Rosenberg J, Svrzikapa N, Blanc A, Carnec A, Carvunis AR, Pulak R, Shingles J, Reece-Hoyes J, Hunt-Newbury R, Viveiros R, Mohler WA, Tasan M, Roth FP, Le Peuch C, Hope IA, Johnsen R, Moerman DG, Barabási AL, Baillie D, Vidal M. Genome-scale analysis of in vivo spatiotemporal promoter activity in Caenorhabditis elegans . Nat Biotechnol , 2007, 25(6): 663-668.
[25] Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res , 2004, 32(Suppl. 1): D277-D280.
[26] Arvidsson S, Kwasniewski M, Riaño-Pachón DM, Mueller-Roeber B. QuantPrime—a flexible tool for reliable high-throughput primer design for quantitative PCR. BMC Bioinformatics , 2008, 9: 465.
[27] Armstrong GA, Hearst JE. Carotenoids 2: Genetics and molecular biology of carotenoid pigment biosynthesis. FASEB J , 1996, 10(2): 228-237.
[28] Sakuraba Y, Rahman ML, Cho SH, Kim YS, Koh HJ, Yoo SC, Paek NC. The rice faded green leaf locus encodes protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B and is essential for chlorophyll synthesis under high light conditions. Plant J , 2013, 74(1): 122-133.

编辑推荐

Metrics

www.chinagene.cn
备案号：京ICP备09063187号-4
总访问:,今日访问:,当前在线:

杂交粳稻花优14及其亲本孕穗期剑叶的基因表达谱芯片分析

Gene expression profiling of flag leaves at the booting stage in the japonica hybrid rice Huayou14 and its parental lines by microarray

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张桂权. 基于SSSL文库的水稻设计育种平台[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(8): 754-760.
[2]	陈应坚,廖苑君,林帆,孙胜南,赵小蕾,覃继恒,饶绍奇. 基于转录组数据的网络分析挖掘鼻咽癌与口腔鳞癌的共享功能模块[J]. 遗传, 2019, 41(2): 146-157.
[3]	刘次桃, 王威, 毛毕刚, 储成才. 水稻耐低温逆境研究：分子生理机制及育种展望[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(3): 171-185.
[4]	杨德卫, 郑向华, 程朝平, 叶宁, 黄凤凰, 叶新福. 基于CSSLs群体定位和图位克隆水稻长芒基因GAD1-2[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(12): 1101-1111.
[5]	辛高伟, 胡熙璕, 王克剑, 王兴春. Cas9蛋白变体VQR高效识别水稻NGAC前间区序列邻近基序[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(12): 1112-1119.
[6]	吴比, 胡伟, 邢永忠. 中国水稻遗传育种历程与展望[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40(10): 841-857.
[7]	李佳,刘运华,张余,陈晨,余霞,余舜武. 干旱对水稻生物钟基因和干旱胁迫响应基因每日节律性变化的影响[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(9): 837-846.
[8]	韩晓斌, 徐冉, 段朋根, 于海跃, 罗越华, 李云海. 水稻斑点叶突变体spl101和spl102的筛选及候选基因鉴定[J]. 遗传, 2017, 39(4): 346-353.
[9]	唐丽, 李曜魁, 张丹, 毛毕刚, 吕启明, 胡远艺, 韶也, 彭彦, 赵炳然, 夏石头. 基于基因组编辑技术的水稻靶向突变特征及遗传分析[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(8): 746-755.
[10]	武迪, 黄林周, 高谨, 王永红. 植物重力反应的分子调控机制[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(7): 589-602.
[11]	孔德艳, 陈守俊, 周立国, 高欢, 罗利军, 刘灶长. 水稻开花光周期调控相关基因研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(6): 532-542.
[12]	李莉云,史佳楠,杨烁,孙财强,刘国振. 基于转录特征的水稻WRKY转录因子功能注释[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(2): 126-136.
[13]	张红宇, 崔晓云, 侯飞雪, 王一伊, 吴挺开, 刘禹彤, 杨定乾, 张洪凯, 傅瑶, 张向阳, 李文丽, 吴先军. 水稻基因组加倍对籽粒大小调控基因表达的影响[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(12): 1102-1111.
[14]	宋海冰, 汪斌, 陈壬杰, 郑小雅, 于世波, 兰涛. 水稻“光身”突变体glr3的遗传分析及基因定位[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(11): 1012-1019.
[15]	胡运高, 郭连安, 杨国涛, 钦鹏, 范存留, 彭友林, 严维, 何航, 李仕贵. 直立密穗基因DEP2-1388的遗传分析及在杂交稻中的育种利用[J]. 遗传, 2016, 38(1): 72-81.