[1] Hebbes TR, Thorne AW, Crane-Robinson C. A direct link between core histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin. EMBO J, 1988, 7(5): 1395-1402.[2] Vidal M, Gaber RF. RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative tran-scriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol, 1991, 11(12): 6317-6327.[3] Hong L, Schroth GP, Matthews HR, Yau P, Bradbury EM. Studies of the DNA binding properties of histone H4 amino terminus: thermal denaturation studies reveal that acetylation markedly reduces the binding constant of the H4 “tail” to DNA. J Biol Chem, 1993, 268(1): 305-314.[4] Lee DY, Hayes JJ, Pruss D, Wolffe AP. A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nu-cleosomal DNA. Cell, 1993, 72(1): 73-84.[5] Zlatanova J, Caiafa P, Van Holde K. Linker histone binding and displacement: versatile mechanism for transcriptional regulation. FASEB J, 2000, 14(12): 1697-1704.[6] Vogelauer M, Rubbi L, Lucas I, Brewer BJ, Grunstein M. Histone acetylation regulates the time of replication origin firing. Mol Cell, 2002, 10(5): 1223-1233.[7] Cervoni N, Szyf M. Demethylase activity is directed by his-tone acetylation. J Biol Chem, 2001, 276(4): 40778-40787.[8] Geiman TM, Robertson KD. Chromatin remodeling, histone modifications, and DNA methylation—how does it all fit together? J Cell Biochem, 2002, 87(2): 117-125.[9] Rybouchkin A, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Role of histone acetylation in reprogramming of somatic nuclei following nuclear transfer. Bio Reprod, 2006, 74(6): 1083-1089.[10] Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IMK, Iwamur S. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod, 2002, 66(1): 112-119.[11] Zhang P, Wang H, Bavister BD, Ji W. Maturation of rhesus monkey oocytes in chemically defined culture media and their functional assessment by IVF and embryo development. Human Reprod, 2001, 16(2): 300-305.[12] Lai LX, Prather RS. Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors. Cloning Stem Cells, 2003, 5(4): 233-241.[13] Kishigami S, Mizutani E, Ohta H, Hikichi T, van Thuan N, Wakayama S, Bui HT, Wakayama T. Significant im-provement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2006, 340(1): 183-189.[14] Sugimura S, Narita K, Yamashiro H, Sugawara A, Shoji T, Terashita Y, Nishimori K, Konno T, Yoshida M, Sato E. Interspecies somatic cell nucleus transfer with porcine oocytes as recipients: A novel bioassay system for assess-ing the competence of canine somatic cells to develop into embryos. Theriogenology, 2009, 72(4): 549-559.[15] Zhao JG, Hao YH, Ross JW, Spate LD, Walters EM, Samuel MS, Rieke A, Murphy CN, Prather RS. Histone deacetylase inhibitors improve in vitro and in vivo developmental competence of somatic cell nuclear transfer porcine embryos. Cell Reprogram, 2010, 12(1): 75-83.[16] Kim YJ, Ahn KS, Kim M, Shim H. Comparison of potency between histone deacetylase inhibitors trichostatin A and valproic acid on enhancing in vitro development of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. In Vitro Cell, Dev Biol Anim, 2011, 47(4): 283-289.[17] Finnin MS, Donigian JR, Cohen A, Richon VM, Rifkind RA, Marks PA, Breslow R, Pavletich NP. Structures of a histone deacetylase homologue bound to the TSA and SAHA inhibitors. Nature, 1999, 401(6749): 188-193.[18] Huangfu DW, Maehr R, Guo WJ, Eijkelenboom A, Snitow M, Chen AE, Melton DA. Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nat Biotechnol, 2008, 26(7): 795-797.[19] Huangfu DW, Osafune K, Maehr R, Guo WJ, Eijkelen-boom A, Chen SB, Muhles |